Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire

  • Burr, Hermann (Division 3 Work and Health, Federal Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA)) ;
  • Berthelsen, Hanne (Center for Work Life and Evaluation Studies (CTA) and the Faculty of Odontology, Malmo University) ;
  • Moncada, Salvador (Union Institute of Work, Environment and Health (ISTAS)) ;
  • Nubling, Matthias (Freiburg Research Centre for Occupational Sciences (FFAW), Freiburg) ;
  • Dupret, Emilie (Preventis) ;
  • Demiral, Yucel (Department of Public Health, Dokuz Eylul University) ;
  • Oudyk, John (Occupational Health Clinics for Ontario Workers (OHCOW)) ;
  • Kristensen, Tage S. (Task-Consult) ;
  • Llorens, Clara (Union Institute of Work, Environment and Health (ISTAS)) ;
  • Navarro, Albert (Research Group on Psychosocial Risks, Organization of Work and Health (POWAH), Autonomous University of Barcelona) ;
  • Lincke, Hans-Joachim (Freiburg Research Centre for Occupational Sciences (FFAW), Freiburg) ;
  • Bocerean, Christine (Preventis) ;
  • Sahan, Ceyda (Department of Public Health, Dokuz Eylul University) ;
  • Smith, Peter (Institute for Work and Health (IWH)) ;
  • Pohrt, Anne (Institut fur Medizinische Psychologie, Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin)
  • Received : 2018.07.25
  • Accepted : 2019.10.23
  • Published : 2019.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Introduction: A new third version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ III) has been developed in response to trends in working life, theoretical concepts, and international experience. A key component of the COPSOQ III is a defined set of mandatory core items to be included in national short, middle, and long versions of the questionnaire. The aim of the present article is to present and test the reliability of the new international middle version of the COPSOQ III. Methods: The questionnaire was tested among 23,361 employees during 2016-2017 in Canada, Spain, France, Germany, Sweden, and Turkey. A total of 26 dimensions (measured through scales or single items) of the middle version and two from the long version were tested. Psychometric properties of the dimensions were assessed regarding reliability (Cronbach α), ceiling and floor effects (fractions with extreme answers), and distinctiveness (correlations with other dimensions). Results: Most international middle dimensions had satisfactory reliability in most countries, though some ceiling and floor effects were present. Dimensions with missing values were rare. Most dimensions had low to medium intercorrelations. Conclusions: The COPSOQ III offers reliable and distinct measures of a wide range of psychosocial dimensions of modern working life in different countries; although a few measures could be improved. Future testing should focus on validation of the COPSOQ items and dimensions using both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Such investigations would enhance the basis for recommendations using the COPSOQ III.

Keywords

References

  1. Nubling M, Burr H, Moncada S, Kristensen TS. COPSOQ International Network: Co-operation for research and assessment of psychosocial factors at work. Public Health Forum 2014;22. 18.e1-.e3.
  2. Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Hogh A, Borg V. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire - a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005;31:11.
  3. Pejtersen JH, Kristensen TS, Borg V, Bjorner JB. The second version of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Scand J Public Health 2010;38:8-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809349858
  4. Kristensen TS. A questionnaire is more than a questionnaire. Scand J Public Health 2010;38:149-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809354437
  5. Dollard M, Skinner N, Tuckey MR, Bailey T. National surveillance of psychosocial risk factors in the workplace: an international overview. Work & Stress 2007;21:1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370701254082
  6. Formazin M, Burr H, Aagestad C, Tynes T, Thorsen SV, Perkio-Makela M, et al. Dimensional comparability of psychosocial working conditions as covered in European monitoring questionnaires. BMC Public Health 2014;14:1251. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1251
  7. Rugulies R, Aust B, Siegrist J, von dem Knesebeck O, Bultmann U, Bjorner JB, et al. Distribution of effort-reward imbalance in Denmark and its prospective association with a decline in self-rated health. J Occup Environ Med 2009;51:870-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181a9086c
  8. Burr H, Albertsen K, Rugulies R, Hannerz H. Do dimensions from the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire predict vitality and mental health over and above the job strain and effort-reward imbalance models? Scand J Public Health 2010;38:59-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809353436
  9. Fransson EI, Nyberg ST, Heikkila K, Alfredsson L, Bacquer de D, Batty GD, et al. Comparison of alternative versions of the job demand-control scales in 17 European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium. BMC Public Health 2012;12:62. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-62
  10. Siegrist J, Dragano N, Nyberg ST, Lunau T, Alfredsson L, Erbel R, et al. Validating abbreviated measures of effort-reward imbalance at work in European cohort studies: the IPD-Work consortium. Int Arch Occup Eenviron Health 2014;87:249-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-013-0855-z
  11. Burr H, d'Errico A. Priority, methodological and conceptual issues regarding epidemiological research of occupational psychosocial risk factors for poor mental health and coronary heart disease. Sociol Lav 2018;63:159-81.
  12. Lund T, Labriola M, Christensen KB, Bultmann U, Villadsen E, Burr H. Psychosocial work environment exposures as risk factors for long-term sickness absence among Danish employees: results from DWECS/DREAM. J Occup Environ Med 2005;47:1141-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000174301.80318.f2
  13. Kiss P, De Meester M, Kristensen TS, Braeckman L. Relationships of organizational social capital with the presence of "gossip and slander," "quarrels and conflicts," sick leave, and poor work ability in nursing homes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2014;87:929-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0937-6
  14. Madsen IE, Larsen AD, Thorsen SV, Pejtersen JH, Rugulies R, Sivertsen B. Joint association of sleep problems and psychosocial working conditions with registered long-term sickness absence. A Danish cohort study. Scand J Work Environ Health 2016;42:299-308. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3571
  15. Nuebling M, Seidler A, Garthus-Niegel S, Latza U, Wagner M, Hegewald J, et al. The Gutenberg Health Study: measuring psychosocial factors at work and predicting health and work-related outcomes with the ERI and the COPSOQ questionnaire. BMC Public Health 2013;13:538. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-538
  16. Leka SJA, Jain A. Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
  17. ILO. Workplace stress: a collective challenge. Geneva: International Labour Organization; 2016.
  18. Nubling M, Stossel U, Hasselhorn HM, Michaelis M, F. H. Measuring psychological stress and strain at work - evaluation of the COPSOQ Questionnaire in Germany. Psychosoc Med 2006;3:Doc05.
  19. Dupret E, Bocerean C, Teherani M, Feltrin M, Pejtersen JH. Psychosocial risk assessment: French validation of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ). Scand J Public Health 2012;40:482-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812453888
  20. Berthelsen H, Westerlund H, Kristensen TS. COPSOQ II - an update and linguistic validation of the Swedish version of a survey for the monitoring of the psychosocial work environment at workplaces. Stockholm, Sweden: Stressforskningsinstitutet, Stockholms Universitet; 2014 [In Swedish].
  21. Moncada S, Utzet M, Molinero E, Llorens C, Moreno N, Galtes A, et al. The copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) in Spain-a tool for psychosocial risk assessment at the workplace. Am J Ind Med 2014;57:97-107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22238
  22. Rosario S, Azevedo LF, Fonseca JA, Nienhaus A, Nubling M, da Costa JT. The Portuguese long version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II (COPSOQ II) - a validation study. J Occup Med Toxicol 2017;12:24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-017-0170-9
  23. Pournik O, Ghalichi L, TehraniYazdi A, Tabatabaee SM, Ghaffari M, Vingard E. Measuring psychosocial exposures: validation of the Persian of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ). Med J Islam Repub Iran 2015;29:221.
  24. Shang L, Liu P, Fan L, Huakang G, Li J. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. J Environ Occup Med 2008;25:572-6. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-3617.2008.06.016
  25. Alvarado R, Perez-Franco J, Saavedra N, Fuentealba C, Alarcon A, Marchetti N, et al. Validacion de un cuestionario para evaluar riesgos psicosociales en el ambiente laboral en Chile. Rev Med Chile 2012;140:1154-63. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872012000900008
  26. Widerszal-Bazyl M. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ) - psychometric properties of selected scales in the Polish version. Medycyna Pracy 2017;68. In Polish.
  27. Setti I, d'Errico A, di Cuonzo D, Fiabane E, Argentero P. Validation and psychometric properties of the Italian Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II - short version. Boll Psicol Appl 2017;65:48-57.
  28. Nubling M, M.V, Haug A, Nubling T, Adiwidjaja A. European wide survey on teachers work related stress -assessment, comparison and evaluation of the impact of psychosocial hazards on teachers at their workplace. Freiburg, Germany: FFAS Freiburg Research Centre Occupational and Social Medicine; 2011.
  29. Moncada S, Llorens C, Navarro A, Kristensen TS. ISTAS21 COPSOQ: castilian language version of the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Arch Preven Riesgos Laboral 2005;8:18-29 [In Spanish].
  30. Iordache R, Petreanu V. The Romanian version of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire - short report. Procedia - Soc Behav Sci 2014;149:424-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.201
  31. Gerke J, Cornelio C, Zelaschi Alberto M, Amable M, Contreras A, et al. Cultural adaptation and validation of the COPSOQ ISTAS21 questionnaire in Argentina. EPICOH. Barcelona: OEM; 2016A101.
  32. Rodrigues CA, Meister de Almeida R, Villar Pellegrin L. Adaptation of an instrument to assess psychosocial risks at work. Sao Paulo: VII Congresso Brasileiro de Avaliacao Psicologica; 2015 [In Portuguese].
  33. Zarate Castillo BG. Validation of the questionnaire COPSOQ Istas21 on health workers of the HGZMF-21 IMSS in Leon. Guanajuato: Convencion Internacional de Salud Publica Cuba Salud; 2012. La Habana 2012.
  34. Nistor K, Adam S, Cserhati Z, Szabo A, T.Z., A.S.. Psychometric characteristics of the Hungarian version of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire II (COPSOQ II). Mentalhigiene Es Pszichoszomatika 2015;16:179-207 [In Hungarian]. https://doi.org/10.1556/0406.16.2015.2.3
  35. Kiss P, De Meester M, Kruse A, Chavee B, Braeckman L. Comparison between the first and second versions of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire: psychosocial risk factors for a high need for recovery after work. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2013;86:17-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-012-0741-0
  36. Nolle I. List of Publications with COPSOQ published in peer-reviewed indexed journals. Freiburg, Germany: COPSOQ International Network. 2018.. https://www.copsoq-network.org/assets/Uploads/Literaturliste-Mai18-Netzwerk-peer-reviewed-only-V1.pdf.
  37. Li J, Shang L, Galatsch M, Siegrist J, Miuller BH, Hasselhorn HM. Psychosocial work environment and intention to leave the nursing profession: a crossnational prospective study of eight countries. Int J Health Serv 2013;43:519-36. https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.43.3.i
  38. Berthelsen H, Pejtersen JH, Soderfeldt B. Measurement of social support, community and trust in dentistry. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2011;39:289-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00593.x
  39. Moncada S, Pejtersen JH, Navarro A, Llorens C, Burr H, Hasle P, et al. Psychosocial work environment and its association with socioeconomic status. A comparison of Spain and Denmark. Scand J Public Health 2010;38:137-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809353825
  40. Kristensen TS, Bjorner JB, Christensen KB, Borg V. The distinction between work pace and working hours in the measurement of quantitative demands at work. Work & Stress 2004;18:305-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370412331314005
  41. Estryn-Behar M, Van der Heijden BI, Oginska H, Camerino D, Le Nezet O, Conway PM, et al. The impact of social work environment, teamwork characteristics, burnout, and personal factors upon intent to leave among European nurses. Med Care 2007;45:939-50. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e31806728d8
  42. Schnall PL, Dobson M, Landsbergis P. Globalization, work, and cardiovascular disease. Int J Health Serv 2016;46:656-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020731416664687
  43. Malard L, Chastang JF, Niedhammer I. Changes in psychosocial work factors in the French working population between 2006 and 2010. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2015;88:235-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0953-6
  44. Utzet M, Moncada S, Molinero E, Llorens C, Moreno N, Navarro A. The changing patterns of psychosocial exposures at work in the south of Europe: Spain as a labor market laboratory. Am J Ind Med 2014;57:1032-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22334
  45. LaMontagne AD, Krnjacki L, Kavanagh AM, Bentley R. Psychosocial working conditions in a representative sample of working Australians 2001-2008: an analysis of changes in inequalities over time. Occup Environ Med 2013;70:639-47. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2012-101171
  46. Smith P, Morassaei S, Mustard C. Examining changes in reported work conditions in quebec, Ontario and saskatchewan between 1994 and 2003-05. Can J Public Health 2011;102:127-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03404161
  47. OECD. Employment outlook. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2017.
  48. European Commission. Directorate-general for employment SAaI. Labour market and wage developments in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017.
  49. Benach J, Vives A, Amable M, Vanroelen C, Tarafa G, Muntaner C. Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annu Rev Public Health 2014;35:229-53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182500
  50. Buchholz S, Hofacker D, Mills M, Blossfeld HP, Kurz K, Hofmeister H. Life courses in the globalization process: the development of social inequalities in modern societies. Eur Sociol Rev 2009;25:53-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn033
  51. Sixth Eurofound. European working conditions survey - overview report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2016.
  52. Berger T, Frey C. Structural transformation in the OECD: digitalisation, deindustrialisation and the future of work. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2016.
  53. Chretien KC, Kind T. Social media and clinical care: ethical, professional, and social implications. Circulation 2013;127:1413-21. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.128017
  54. Privitera C, Campbell MA. Cyberbullying: the new face of workplace bullying? Cyberpsychol Behav 2009;12:395-400. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2009.0025
  55. Jonsson S, Muhonen T, Forssell RC, Backstrom M. Assessing exposure to bullying through digital devices in working life: two versions of a cyberbullying questionnaire (CBQ). Psychology 2017;8:477-94. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2017.83030
  56. Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Job demandseresources theory. In: Chen PY, Cooper CL, editors. Work and wellbeing: a complete reference guide. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
  57. Schaufeli WB, Taris TW. A critical review of the job demands-resources model: implications for improving work and health. Bridging occupational, organizational and public health: a transdisciplinary approach. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media; 2014. p. 43-68.
  58. Oksanen T, Kawachi I, Jokela M, Kouvonen A, Suzuki E, Takao S, et al. Workplace social capital and risk of chronic and severe hypertension: a cohort study. J Hypertens 2012;30:1129-36. https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32835377ed
  59. Oksanen T, Kivimaki M, Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Takao S, Suzuki E, et al. Workplace social capital and all-cause mortality: a prospective cohort study of 28,043 public-sector employees in Finland. Am J Public Health 2011;101:1742-8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300166
  60. Berthelsen H, Hakanen J, Kristensen TS, Lonnblad A, Westerlund H. A qualitative study on the content validity of the social capital scales in the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire (COPSOQ II). Scand J Work Organ Psychol 2016;1:1-13. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.12
  61. Semmer NK, Tschan F, Jacobshagen N, Beehr TA, Elfering A, Kalin W, et al. Stress as offense to self: a promising approach comes of age. Occup Health Sci 2019:1-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41542-018-0012-x
  62. Holman D. Job types and job quality in Europe. Hum Relat 2013;66:475-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712456407
  63. Smulders P. Work in 27 european countries: testing the north-south hypothesis. Tijdschr Arb 2004;20:275-87.
  64. Dragano N, Siegrist J, Wahrendorf M. Welfare regimes, labour policies and unhealthy psychosocial working conditions: a comparative study with 9917 older employees from 12 European countries. J Epidemiol Community Health 2011;65:793-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.098541
  65. Thorsen SV, Bjorner JB. Reliability of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Scand J Public Health 2010;38:25-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494809349859
  66. Llorens C, Perez-Franco J, Oudyk J, Berthelsen H, Dupret E, Nubling M, et al. Agreed guidelines for the use of COPSOQ III. 2nd ed. Freiburg, Germany: COPSOQ International Network. 2018. https://www.copsoq-network.org/assets/Uploads/COPSOQ-network-guidelines-for-the-use-of-COPSOQ-III-290618sig.pdf.
  67. Nubling M, Lincke HJ, Schroder H, Knerr P, Gerlach I, Lass I. Desired and experienced quality of work. In: Hofmann F, Reschauer G, Stossel U, editors. Arbeitsmedizin im Gesundheitsdienst. Tagungsband 29 des Freiburger Symposiums Arbeitsmedizin im Gesundheitsdienst. Germany: Freiburg; 2015 [In German].
  68. Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educ Psychol Meas 2006;66:701-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
  69. Siegrist J, Wege N, Puhlhofer F, Wahrendorf M. A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort-reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2009;82:1005-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0384-3
  70. World Bank. Employment in services, female (% of female employment) (modeled ILO estimate). World Bank Group; 2019.
  71. Burr H, Moncada S, Berthelsen H, Nubling M, Dupret E, Perez J, et al. The COPSOQ III questionnaire. Freiburg, Germany: The COPSOQ International Network. 2018. https://www.copsoq-network.org/assets/Uploads/annex1-Dimensions-and-items-in-the-COPSOQ-III-questionnaire-060718.pdf.
  72. Gliem JA, Gliem RR. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. In: Midwest research-to-practice conference in adult, continuing, and community education 2003.
  73. Boronat M, Gonzalez-Lleo A, Rodriguez-Perez C, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Lopez-Plasencia Y, Rasmussen AK, et al. Adaptation and cross-cultural validation of the Spanish version of the thyroid-related quality-of-life patient-reported outcome questionnaire. Endocrinol Diabetes Y Nutr 2018;65:500-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endinu.2018.06.010
  74. Hakstian AR, Whalen TE. A k-sample significance test for independent alpha coefficients. Psychometrika 1976;41:219-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291840
  75. Willis GB, Miller K. Cross-cultural cognitive interviewing: seeking comparability and enhancing understanding. Field Methods 2011;23:331-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X11416092
  76. Bjorner JB, Kristensen TS, Orth-Gomer K, Tibblin G, Sullivan M, Westerholm P. Self-rated health: a useful concept in research, prevention and clinical medicine. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Planning Coordination of Research F. R. N.; 1996.
  77. Ramkissoon A, Smith P, Oudyk J. Dissecting the effect of workplace exposures on workers' rating of psychological health and safety. Am J Ind Med 2019;62:412-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22964
  78. Sahan C, Baydur H, Demiral Y. A novel version of Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire-3: Turkish validation study. Arch Environ Occup Health 2018:1-13.
  79. Bultmann U, Kant I, van Amelsvoort LG, van den Brandt PA, Kasl SV. Differences in fatigue and psychological distress across occupations: results from the maastricht cohort study of fatigue at work. J Occup Environ Med 2001;43:976-83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00043764-200111000-00008
  80. Fredlund P, Hallqvist J, Diderichsen F. Psychosocial job exposure matrix. An update of a classification system for work-related psychosocial exposures. In: Marklund S, editor. Arbete och Halsa. Stockholm: National Institute for working life; 2000 [In Swedish].
  81. Schwartz J, Pieper C, Karasek R. A procedure for linking psychosocial job characteristics data to health surveys. Am J Public Health 1988;78:904-9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.78.8.904
  82. Nubling M, Vomstein M, Haug A, Lincke HJ. Are reference data from the COPSOQ database suitable for a JEM on psychosocial factors at work? Zbl Arbeitsmed 2017;67:151-4 [In German]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40664-017-0182-4
  83. Berthelsen H, Conway PM, Clausen T. Is organizational justice climate at the workplace associated with individual-level quality of care and organizational affective commitment? A multi-level, cross-sectional study on dentistry in Sweden. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2018;91:237-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-017-1275-2
  84. Berthelsen H, Westerlund H, Hakanen JJ, Kristensen TS. It is not just about occupation, but also about where you work. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2017;45:372-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12300
  85. Janetzke H, Ertel M. Psychosocial risk management in a european comparison. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt fur Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin; 2017.
  86. Tsuboya T, Tsutsumi A, Kawachi I. Change in psychological distress following change in workplace social capital: results from the panel surveys of the JHOPE study. Occup Environ Med 2015;72:188-94. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2014-102427
  87. Driller E, Ommen O, Kowalski C, Ernstmann N, Pfaff H. The relationship between social capital in hospitals and emotional exhaustion in clinicians: a study in four German hospitals. Int J Soc Psychiatr 2011;57:604-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764010376609
  88. Kouvonen A, Oksanen T, Vahtera J, Stafford M, Wilkinson R, Schneider J, et al. Low workplace social capital as a predictor of depression: the Finnish Public Sector Study. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1143-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwn067
  89. Gittell JH. High performance healthcare: using the power of relationships to achieve quality, efficiency and resilience. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009.
  90. Gittell JH. The southwest airlines way: using the power of relationships to achieve high performance. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
  91. Perzynski AT, Caron A, Margolius D, Sudano Jr JJ. Primary care practice workplace social capital: a potential secret sauce for improved staff wellbeing and patient experience. J Patient Exp 2019;6:72-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373518777742
  92. Rugulies R, Hasle P, Pejtersen JH, Aust B, Bjorner JB. Workplace social capital and risk of long-term sickness absence. Are associations modified by occupational grade? Eur J Public Health 2016;26:328-33. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckv244
  93. Burchell M, Robin J. The great workplace: how to build it, how to keep it, and why it matters. New York: Wiley; 2010.
  94. de Jong T. Linking social capital to knowledge productivity: an explorative study on the relationship between social capital and learning in knowledgeproductive networks. Enschede, Netherlands: Springer Uitgeverij; 2010.
  95. Maurer I, Bartsch V, Ebers M. The value of intra-organizational social capital: how it fosters knowledge transfer, innovation performance, and growth. Organ Stud 2011;32:157-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840610394301
  96. Boedker C, Meagher K, Vidgen R, Cogin J, Mouritsen J. Doing more with less: productivity or starvation? The intellectual asset health check. Public Money Manag 2017;37:31-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1249229
  97. Leana CR, Pil FK. Social capital and organizational performance: evidence from urban public schools. Organ Sci 2006;17:353-66. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0191
  98. Muller-Thur K, Angerer P, Korner U, Dragano N. Working with digital technologies, psychosocial stress and potential health consequences. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 2018;53:387-91 [In German].
  99. Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1996;1:27-41. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27
  100. Garthus-Niegel S, Nubling M, Letzel S, Hegewald J, Wagner M, Wild PS, et al. Development of a mobbing short scale in the gutenberg health study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2016;89:137-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-015-1058-6

Cited by

  1. Job insecurity, economic hardship, and sleep problems in a national sample of salaried workers in Spain vol.6, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleh.2020.02.014
  2. Die Messung psychischer Belastungen mit dem COPSOQ vol.28, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1515/pubhef-2020-0016
  3. Occupation-Based Measures-An Overview and Discussion vol.72, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-020-00673-4
  4. Does staff‐assessed care quality predict early failure of dental fillings? A prospective study vol.48, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12543
  5. Not All Emotional Demands Are the Same: Emotional Demands from Clients’ or Co-Workers’ Relations Have Different Associations with Well-Being in Service Workers vol.17, pp.21, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217738
  6. Benchmarks for Evidence-Based Risk Assessment with the Swedish Version of the 4-Item Psychosocial Safety Climate Scale vol.17, pp.22, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228675
  7. Comparing perceived psychosocial working conditions of nurses and physicians in two university hospitals in Germany with other German professionals - feasibility of scale conversion between two versio vol.15, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-020-00277-w
  8. Cyberbullying Among Traditional and Complementary Medicine Practitioners in the Workplace: Protocol for a Cross-sectional Descriptive Study vol.10, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2196/29582
  9. Working conditions as risk factors for early exit from work—in a cohort of 2351 employees in Germany vol.94, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01566-x
  10. High Psychosocial Work Demands, Decreased Well-Being, and Perceived Well-Being Needs Within Veterinary Academia During the COVID-19 Pandemic vol.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.746716
  11. Precarious Employment and Stress: The Biomedical Embodiment of Social Factors. PRESSED Project Study Protocol vol.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.649447
  12. The Importance of Contextualized Psychosocial Risk Indicators in Workplace Stress Assessment: Evidence from the Healthcare Sector vol.18, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063263
  13. Assessing the Psychosocial Work Environment in Relation to Mental Health: A Comprehensive Approach vol.65, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxaa130
  14. Assistive devices for manual materials handling in warehouses: a systematic literature review vol.59, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1853845
  15. Analyse sexueller Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz in der Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastungen : Erfahrungen mit dem COPSOQ vol.71, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40664-021-00428-8
  16. The Demand-Control Model as a Predictor of Depressive Symptoms-Interaction and Differential Subscale Effects: Prospective Analyses of 2212 German Employees vol.18, pp.16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168328
  17. Using health and safety monitoring routines to enhance sustainable employability vol.70, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-213615
  18. An Institutional Approach to Harassment vol.3, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2021.08.004
  19. Wie sind Schlüsselressourcen und -anforderungen mit dem Arbeitsengagement Pflegender während der COVID-19-Pandemie assoziiert? Eine Querschnittstudie vol.167, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2021.09.008
  20. Stressors, self-reported overall health, potential protective factors and the workplace well-being of nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland: a longitudinal mixed-methods study protocol vol.11, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057021
  21. Does workplace social capital predict care quality through job satisfaction and stress at the clinic? A prospective study vol.21, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11320-8
  22. COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work vol.16, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1
  23. When and Why Demands Reveal Their Challenging Potential during Change vol.18, pp.24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413076
  24. Promoting recovery in daily life: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial vol.9, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00591-w