Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mystery Shopping and Well-Being of Service Workers in South Korea

  • Shin, Heeju (The Catholic University of Korea, Department of Sociology)
  • Received : 2019.07.25
  • Accepted : 2019.10.04
  • Published : 2019.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Mystery shopping is a method in which a company monitors quality of service and employee conduct and compliance with regulations using an evaluator posing as a customer. It is a typical tool of customer-centered bureaucratic control insofar as it provides overall and standardized evaluation of intangible elements of customer service as well as physical elements of service environments. The purpose of this study is to examine how mystery shopping is related to the health status of service workers in South Korea. Methods: Data from semistructured interviews with 15 workers were collected from January to April 2019 to obtain information on service worker experiences with mystery shopping. Data were analyzed using the constant comparison method. Results: Mystery shopping limits worker autonomy and stiffens the workplace environment by standardizing and monitoring labor processes for service workers. In addition, mystery shopping heightens work stress through increased labor intensity. Five mechanisms by which mystery shopping affects service worker health are identified and comprise (1) multifaceted and multilayered surveillance, (2) evaluator subjectivity and irrational requirements, (3) standardized rules combined with high pressure to achieve sales, (4) self-esteem degradation because of evaluator results, and (5) musculoskeletal disorders because of strict adherence to labor processes based on evaluator results. Conclusion: Mystery shopping as an evaluation method should be reconsidered not only in terms of health problems but also in terms of organizational efficiency and issues of human rights.

Keywords

References

  1. Wilson AM. The use of mystery shopping in the measurement of service delivery. Serv Ind J 2006;18:148-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069800000037
  2. Cobb R. Isn't it just common sense. Marketing 1997 Jul;31:16-7.
  3. Finn A, Kayande U. Unmasking a phantom: a psychometric assessment of mystery shopping. J Retail 1999;75:195-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)00004-4
  4. Van Der Wiele T, Hesselink M, Iwaarden JV. Mystery shopping: a tool to develop insight into customer service provision. Total Qual Manage Bus 2005;16:529-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500078433
  5. Ahn BO, Lee HK. A study on the development of mystery shopping checklist for quality measurement of quality of service - focusing the convenience store. Acad Cust Satisf Manage 2017;19:39-65 [in Korean].
  6. Kim YG, Lee HR, Kim YJ. A scale development study for mystery shopping of restaurant - focused on Korean restaurant. J Foodserv Manage 2014;17:307-28 [in Korean].
  7. Korczynski M. The contradictions of service work: call centre as customeroriented bureaucracy. In: Sturdy A, Grugulis I, Willmott H, editors. Customer service: empowerment and entrapment. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan; 2001. p. 79-101.
  8. Kim JJ, Song MJ. A study on emotional labor and improvement of labor environment in South Korea. Seoul: the Korea Tripartite Commission; 2014 [in Korean].
  9. Kain J, Jex S, Karasek's. Job demands-control model: a summary of current issues and recommendations for future research. In: Perrewe PL, Ganster DC, editors. New development in theoretical and conceptual approaches to job stress. Bingley(UK): Emerald Group Publishing; 1979. p. 237-68. 2010.
  10. Baillien E, De Cuyper N, De Witte H. Job autonomy and workload as antecedents of workplace bullying: a two-wave test of Karasek's Job Demand Control Model for targets and perpetrators. J Occup Organ Psych 2011;84:191-208. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910X508371
  11. Kim H, Stoner M. Burnout and turnover intention among social workers: effects of role stress, job autonomy and social support. Admin Soc Work 2008;32:5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03643100801922357
  12. Hochschild AR. The managed heart. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1983. 90 p.
  13. Mirriam SB, Tisdell EJ. Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation. 4th ed. New Jersey(US): John Wiley & Sons; 2015. 368 p.
  14. Aiello JR, Kolb KJ. Electronic performance monitoring and social context: impact on productivity and stress. J Appl Psychol 1995;80:339-53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.3.339
  15. Davidson R, Henderson R. Electronic performance monitoring: a laboratory investigation of the influence of monitoring and difficulty on task performance, mood state, and self-reported stress levels. J Appl Soc Psychol 2000;30:906-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02502.x
  16. Carayon P. Effects of electronic performance monitoring on job design and worker stress: results of two studies. Int J Hum Comput Interact 1994 Apr 1;6:177-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319409526089
  17. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Development of the job diagnostic survey. J Appl Psychol 1975;60:159-70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076546
  18. Chung MS. The buffering effect of autonomy between emotional labor and job stress in childcare teachers. Korean J Counsel Psychother 2014 Feb;26:pp147-66 [in Korean].
  19. Diefendorff JM, Gosserand RH. Understanding the emotional labor process: a control theory perspective. J Organ Behav 2003;24:945-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.230
  20. Mai QD, Hill TD, Vila-Henninger L, Grandner MA. Employment insecurity and sleep disturbance: evidence from 31 European countries. J Sleep Res 2019;28:e12763. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.12763
  21. Van Amelsvoort LG, Kant IJ, Bultmann U, Swaen GM. Need for recovery after work and the subsequent risk of cardiovascular disease in a working population. Occup Environ Med 2003;60(Suppl. 1):83-7.
  22. Kivimaki M, Leino-Arjas P, Kaila-Kangas L, Luuukkonen R, Vahtera J, Elovainio M. Is incomplete recover from work a risk marker of cardiovascular death? prospective evidence from industrial employees. Psychosom Med 2006;68:402-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000221285.50314.d3
  23. Ayas NT, White DP, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Speizer FE, Malhotra A, Hu FB. Prospective study of sleep duration and coronary heart disease in women. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:205-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.2.205
  24. Eaker ED, Pinsky J, Castelli WP. Myocardial infarction and coronary death among women: psychosocial predictors from a 20-year follow-up of women in the Framingham study. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:854-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116381
  25. Abercrombie N. The privilege of the producer. In: Keat R, Abercrombie N, editors. Enterprise culture. London(UK): Routledge; 1991. p. 171-85.
  26. Shin KA. The structural cause and individualized effect of the emotional labor: the cases of women workers in call-centers. Korean J Labor Stud 2009;15:223-56. https://doi.org/10.17005/kals.2009.15.2.223
  27. Holman D. Phoning in sick? an overview of employee stress in call centres. Leadersh Org Dev J 2003;24:123-30. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730310469543
  28. Lee HS. An empirical approach to the impact of emotional labor strategy on emotional dissonance - focused on sales pressure -. J Tour Manage Res 2013;56:305-18 [in Korean].
  29. Lee HJ, Choo TG. Fashion product Salesperson's perception of department store in department store middle management system. Fashion & text. Res J 2013;15:22-34 [In Korean]. https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2013.15.1.022
  30. Cook LS, Bowen DE, Chase RB, Dasu S, Stewart DM, Tansik DA. Human issues in service design. J Oper Manage 2002;20:159-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00094-8
  31. Yagil D, Luria G, Gal I. Stressors and resources in customer service roles: exploring the relationship between core self-evaluations and burnout. Int J Serv Ind Manage 2008;19:575-95. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230810903479
  32. Judge TA, Erez A, Bono JE. The power of being positive: the relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Hum Perform 1998;11:167-87. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1102&3_4
  33. Judge TA, Locke EA, Durham CC, Kluger AN. Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: the role of core evaluations. J Appl Psychol 1998;83:17-34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.17
  34. Carayon P, Smith MJ, Haims MC. Work organization, job stress, and workrelated musculoskeletal disorders. Hum Factor. 1999;41:644-63. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779656743
  35. Malchaire J, Roquelaure Y, Cock N, Piette A, Vergracht S, Chiron H. Musculoskeletal complaints, functional capacity, personality and psychosocial factors. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2001;74:549-57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004200100264
  36. Kim KS, Park JK, Kim DS. Status and characteristics of occurrence of workrelated musculoskeletal disorders. J Ergon Soc Korea 2010;29:405-22 [in Korean]. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2010.29.4.405
  37. Hwang JJ, Jung MC, Kim HJ, Jung Choi KH, Bahk JW, Lee IS. Evaluation of risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders in cashier work activities. J Korean Soc Saf 2011;26:75-82 [in Korean]. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2011.26.3.075
  38. Van Dijk PA, Kirk-Brown A. Emotional labour and negative job outcomes: an evaluation of the mediating role of emotional dissonance. J Manag Organ 2006;12:101-15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1833367200004053
  39. Karatepe OM, Aleshinloye KD. Emotional dissonance and emotional exhaustion among hotel employees in Nigeria. Int J Hosp Manag 2009;28:349-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2008.12.002