대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학 (Journal of radiological science and technology)

  • 제42권2호
  • /
  • Pages.105-111
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2288-3509(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1168(eISSN)
대한방사선과학회 (Korean Society of Radiological Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

전산화단층촬영검사 시 검사실 내에 위치할 수 있는 의료인의 간접 피폭선량에 대한 연구

A Study on the Indirect Radiation Exposure of the Medical Personnel Who is Responsible for Patient Safety in CT Examination

  • 최민혁 (서울아산병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 장지성 (서울아산병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 이기백 (서울아산병원 영상의학과)
  • Choi, Min-Hyeok (Department of Radiology, Seoul Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Jang, Ji-Sung (Department of Radiology, Seoul Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Ki-Baek (Department of Radiology, Seoul Asan Medical Center)
  • 투고 : 2019.03.24
  • 심사 : 2019.04.23
  • 발행 : 2019.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A medical personnel could be placed beside a patient together in CT room to do Ambu-bag for a seriously ill patients or emergency patient. At this time, the medical personnel can be exposed indirect radiation unnecessarily. In this case, it is necessary to recognize indirect radiation dose levels and methods to reduce them using actual clinical CT protocols such as Chest, Abdomen, and Brain CT. We researched surface radiation dose with or without radiation protectors such as apron and goggles according to different distances far from gantry using two different CT scanners (Fixed MDCT and mobile CT). As a result, for Chest, Abdomen, and Brain CT with Fixed MDCT, indirect radiation dose on thorax portion were 0.047, 0.089, 0.034 mSv without apron. Also, those with apron were 0.007, 0.012, 0.006 mSv. In case of mobile CT, it was 0.014 mSv without apron and 0.005 mSv with apron. By using protectors and increasing the distance, we could reduce it to 97%. Systematic management is necessary based on the measured data in order to minimize radiation damage due to indirect exposure dose.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chelsea JA, Kidwel CS, Nentwich LM, Luby M, Butman JA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison. Lancet. 2007;369(9558):293-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60151-2
  2. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, et al, Radiation Dose Associated with Common Computed Tomography Examinations and the Associated Lifetime Attributable Risk of Cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2015;169(22):2078-86. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.427
  3. Do KH, Sung DW. Strategies of computed tomography radiation dose reduction: justification and optimization. J Korean Med Assoc. 2015;58(6):534-41. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2015.58.6.534
  4. Becker CD. The trauma concept: the role of MDCT in the diagnosis and management of visceral injuries. European Radiology. 2005;15(Suppl. 4):105-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10406-005-0122-9
  5. Oh YH, Kim KD. Moderate Head Injury: Predictors of a Repeat CT Scan. The Journal of Korean Society of Emergency Medicine. 2010;10:444-53.
  6. Seo SY, Han MS, Kim CG, Jeon MC, Kim YK, Kim GJ. A study on the usefulness of a fusion model designed cloak shield to reduce the radiation exposure of the assistant during CT of severely injured patient. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society. 2017;8(9):211-6. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.9.211
  7. Ko IH, Kwon DC, Kim KG, Kim KH, Kim MK, et al. Textbook of Computed Tomography. Seoul: Chung-Koo; 2009.
  8. Mettler F, Briggs J, Carchman R, Altobelli K, Hart B, Kelsey C. Use of radiology in U.S. general short-term hospital: 1980-1990. Radiology. 1993;189(2):377-80. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.189.2.8210363
  9. McCunn M, Mirvis S, Reynolds NH, Cottingham C. Physician utilization of a portable computed tomography scanner in the intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine. 2000;28(12):3808-13. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200012000-00008
  10. Mansoor D, Azita Z, Hamid R, Fateme D, Sara R. Intensive Care Nurses Knowledge of Radiation safety and their behaviors towards portable radiological examinations. Nurs Midwifery Stud. 2014;3(4):e23354.
  11. Guttesman BE, Gutman A, Lindsell CJ, Larrabee H. Radiation exposure in emergency physicians working in an urban ED: a prospective cohort study. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2010;28(9):1037-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2009.06.008
  12. Van Every B, Petty R. Measurements of computed tomography radiation scatter. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 1992;15(1):15-24.
  13. Ahn BS. A study on the exposure and free space scattered dose in radiography. Journal of Korean Society of Radiological Technology. 1998;26-30.
  14. Jeong HM, Won DY, Kim DK, Jeong JE. Measurement of Space Dose Distribution during Expossure Micro Computed Tomography for Scattering Rays. Journal of Korean Society of Radiological Technology. 2013;7(1):45-50.
  15. Park HH. Consideration about Radiological Technology Student's Frequent Workers Exposure Dose Rate. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2018;41(6):573-80. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2018.41.6.573
  16. Kim KJ, Jung HR, Hong DH. Factors Influencing Protective Behavior against Radiation Exposure of Radiological Technologist in Computed Tomography Examination Room. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2018;41(6):581-6. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2018.41.6.581
  17. Nam GS, Lee DH, Koo BS, Kwon SA, Dae MC, Min HK. Dose reduction of medical personnel using breathing circuit during brain CT examination with artificial manual breathing unit bagging. Journal of Korean Society of Computed Tomographic Technology. 2015;17(2):123-32.