DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prioritizing Land Purchase in Hwapocheon Wetland Protection Area - Based on Habitat Suitability Index for Flagship Species -

화포천 습지보호지역 토지 매수 우선순위 산정 - 깃대종 서식지 적합성 지수를 고려하여 -

  • Received : 2019.02.19
  • Accepted : 2019.04.09
  • Published : 2019.04.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to prioritize land purchase in Hwapocheon wetland protection area by reflecting the conservation value of wetlands considering HSI(Habitat Suitability Index) for flagship species. As a result of this study, the flagship species, Oriental White Stork and Been Goose, which can represent the Hwapocheon wetland protection area, were selected through selection criteria and expert feedback. Based on the habitat requirements of the selected flagship species, SI(Suitability Index) for the flagship species was reviewed and the conservation value of wetlands was assessed. The conservation value of the wetlands was divided into five grades from very high to very low. The areas with high conservation value were mainly distributed around wetlands and waters in upstream and downstream of Hwapocheon wetland protection area. The land purchase priorities were divided into five grades by overlapping the thematic maps of the conservation value of wetlands, the economics, and the urgency of restoration. The arable lands which can disrupt wetland ecosystems are analyzed as priority areas where priority purchasing is required. Relatively well-preserved wetlands and areas have low land purchase priorities. This study is meaningful in that biodiversity is considered in land purchase priorities.

Keywords

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. The land ownership map in Hwapochen wetland protection area

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. The process for prioritizing land purchase

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. The map showing the assessment of conservation vlaue of wetlands

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 5. The map showing land price by parcel

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 4. The map showing officially assessed land price per parcel

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 7. The map showing the land purchase priorities

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_f0007.png 이미지

Figure 6. The map showing the urgency of restoration

Table 1. The land ownership in Hwapocheon wetland protection area

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Evaluation according to the selection criteria for flagship species

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Habitat requirements for flagship species

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. SI by habitat variables of flagship species

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Scoring standard for officially assessed land price per parcel

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Scoring standard for land price by parcel

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Scoring standard for the urgency of restoration

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Area and ratio by the land purchase priorities

HKBOB5_2019_v22n2_59_t0008.png 이미지

References

  1. Choi JY. 2003. Study on the riparian buffer establishment and its priority estimation: focused on Four River restoration area. report to Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean)
  2. Choi JY and Lee JH. 2001. Research on estab lishing and managing the urban riparian green area. report to Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean)
  3. ChungNam Institute(CNI). 2015. Habitat Evaluation Procedures Manual. Paju: Hanul Publishing Group. (in Korean)
  4. Gibson, L. A..B. A. Wilson.D. M. Cahill and J. Hill. 2004. Modelling habitat suitability of the swamp antechinus (Antechinus minimus maritimus) in the coastal heathlands of southern Victoria, Australia, Biological Conservation. 117(2): 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00288-X
  5. Hong JP.Lee JW.Choi OH.Son JD.Cho DG and Ahn TM. 2014. A Study on Land Acquisition Priority for Establishing Riparian Buffer Zones in Korea. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 17(4): 29-41. (in Korean with English summary)
  6. Kim SK. 2009. Habitat Suitability Assessment for the Reintroduction of Oriental White Stork(Ciconia boyciana): A GIS-based Multi-Criteria Evaluation Approach. Ph.D dissertation, Graduate School of Korea National University of Education. (in Korean with English summary)
  7. Korea National Park Service(KNPS). 2007. Selection and Conservation Plan of the Flagship Species by National Park. (in Korean)
  8. Lee EJ. 2014. A Study on the Selection, Preservation, and Utilization of the Flagship Species in Taejon City. Research report of Daejeon Development Institute. (in Korean)
  9. MOE(Ministry of Environment). 2009. Guidelines for Ecological and Scenery Conservation Area. (in Korean)
  10. MOE(Ministry of Environment). 2016. A Study on the Management Effectiveness Evaluation for Protected Areas in Korea. (in Korean)
  11. MOE(Ministry of Environment). 2018. 3rd Master Plans for Wetland Conservation. (in Korean)
  12. Oh CH and Lee GY. 2010. Selection of Ecological Flagship Species in Seoul. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Environment and Ecology Conference 20(2): 85-88. (in Korean)
  13. Park TH. 2010. A Study on Environmentally Friendly Waterside Management Method for Improvement of the Water Quality at Imha Dam of Nakdong River, MA dissertation, University of Seoul. (in Korean with English summary)
  14. Rho PH.Yoon JH.Choi JG.Lee SW and Seo HJ. 2010. Habitat evaluation strategy for legally protected wildbirds in Korea. Research report of Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean with English summary)
  15. Shim YJ. 2004. A study on the site selection of wetland replacement using Korean redfrog (Runa amurensis coreana Okada) habitat suitability index: focusing on Pangyo residential development site. MA dissertation, Seoul National University. (in Korean with English summary)
  16. Shim YJ.Cha JY.Park YS.Lee DJ.Seo Y H.Hong JP and Cho DG. 2014a. A Study on the Land Purchase Priority Measurement of the Riparian Areas in Yeongsan and Seomjin River Basin: Focusing on the Riparian Areas of the Juam Lake. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 17(1): 173-184. (in Korean with English summary)
  17. Shim YJ.Cho DG.Park S.Lee DJ.Seo Y H.Kim SH.Kim DH.Ko SB.Cha JY and Sung HC. 2014b. Development of Habitat Suitability Index for Habitat Restoration of Narrow-mouth Frog(Kaloula borealis). J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 17(2): 109-123. (in Korean with English summary)
  18. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1980. Habitat as a basis for environmental assessment. Ecological Services Manual, 101.
  19. Woodley, S..B. Bertzky.N. Crawhall.N. Dudley.J.M. Londonno.K. MacKinnon. K. Redford and T. Sandwith. 2012. Meeting Aichi Target 11 : What does success look like for protected area system? Parks 18: 23-36.
  20. Ministry of Environment Press Releases (2017.5.2.) (in Korean)
  21. Ministry of Environment Press Releases (2017.11.23.) (in Korean)

Cited by

  1. 습지보호지역 버드나무림의 식물군락 특성 vol.23, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.17663/jwr.2021.23.3.201