DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

게임콘텐츠산업정책의 우선순위에 대한 연구

The Relative Importance and Priority of Game Contents Industry Policy

  • 전경란 (동의대학교 디지털콘텐츠학전공)
  • 투고 : 2019.03.10
  • 심사 : 2019.04.10
  • 발행 : 2019.04.20

초록

본 연구는 게임콘텐츠 관련 전문가들이 지능정보시대에 콘텐츠산업의 변화를 어떻게 인식하고 있고, 콘텐츠산업 정책 중에서 어떤 평가요인에 우선순위를 두고 있는가에 대해 살펴보았다. 이를 위해 계층분석과정을 이용하여 콘텐츠산업 정책 평가요인들의 상대적 중요도와 우선순위를 분석하였다. 분석결과, '콘텐츠 기술역량 강화', '콘텐츠 전문인력 양성', '콘텐츠관련 제도개선', '콘텐츠 이용 및 소비자 안전강화'의 순으로 평가되었으며, 하위항목 분석에서는 '콘텐츠 R&D 체계구축 강화'가 가장 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 전문가집단별 분석에서는 산업계와 정책기관이 '콘텐츠기술역량 강화'를, 학계에서는 '콘텐츠 전문인력 양성'을 중요하게 평가하였다.

This research studied how game contents related experts recognize the transition of contents industries in intellectual information era. This study also studied experts' priorities of evaluation elements in contents industry policies. For this, Analytic Hierarchy Process was utilized to analyze the relative importance and priorities of evaluation elements in contents industry policies. According to the analysis, the order of priorities was 'strengthening content technology', 'training content experts', 'improving the contents-related system' and 'strengthening content usage and consumer safety'. Also, in complex importance analysis, 'strengthening R&D system for content' was gauge as the most important element. In the analysis about each related group's thinking, industries and policy institutes considered 'strengthening content technology' important and academia evaluated 'training content experts' as the most important one.

키워드

[Table 1] Content industry policy evaluation factor hierarchy

KGOHCL_2019_v19n2_55_t0001.png 이미지

[Table 2] Weights and priorities of evaluation factors of contents industry policy

KGOHCL_2019_v19n2_55_t0002.png 이미지

[Table 3] Complex weights and priorities of all evaluation factors of contents industry policy

KGOHCL_2019_v19n2_55_t0003.png 이미지

[Table 4] Weights and priorities of policy evaluation factors by subject (Stage 1)

KGOHCL_2019_v19n2_55_t0004.png 이미지

[Table 5] Complex weights and priorities of policy evaluation factors by subject (Stage 2)

KGOHCL_2019_v19n2_55_t0005.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Won-Tae Lee, Major Problems and Countermeasures of ICT Legislation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Korea Legislation Research Institute2016
  2. Kwang-Hee Chung, Educational innovation trend of intelligence information society, Korea Educational Development Institute, 2017
  3. Korea Creative Content Agency, 4th Industrial Revolution and Strategy to Improve Competitiveness of Content Industry, KOCCA, 2017
  4. Sangki Jin, Youngwon Park, "The Study on the Korean Future Readiness Policy for the 4th Industrial Revolution", Journal of Korean Associastion for Regional Information Society Vol. 20, No. 3, pp.31-58, 2017
  5. Seung-hoon Chor, "Control of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and Cultural Industrial Policy", Cultural Solidarity Seminar Proceeding, 2017
  6. D. Boyd, K. Crawford, "Critical questions for big data". Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp.662-679, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
  7. Yoon Kyung Chung, Mi Sun Kim, "A Study on the Development Policy of Contents Industry in the Convergence Era: Focusing on the Evaluation of Status and Importance", Korean Journal of Communication & Information, No. 27, pp.227-249, 2012
  8. Sang-Min Shim, "The Study on the Paradigm Change of Policy Making in the field of Korean Content Industry", Review of Culture & Economy Vol. 17, No. 2, pp.103-135, 2014
  9. Content Industry Promotion Committee, 2016 Contents Industry Promotion Plan, Content Industry Promotion Committee, 2015
  10. Marie Kim, Nae Soo Kim, Cheol Sig Pyo, "4th Industrial Revolution Driven by AI Service Platform", The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences Vol. 43, No. 10, pp.1763-1769, 2018 https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2018.43.10.1763
  11. Kyuchan Kim, "The Characteristics and Achievements of Korean Government's Content Industry Policy: A Longitudinal Study on the Cultural Budget Between 1974 and 2011", Journal of communication research Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 276-308, 2013 https://doi.org/10.22174/jcr.2013.50.1.276
  12. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980
  13. T. L. Saaty & L. G. Vargas, Model, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Boston: Kluwer Academic. 2001
  14. Seong-Ho Choi, Jong-Woo Park, Dong-Hyuk Jo, "Research on Relative Importance of Business Model Factors by Using AHP Method: Focused on Knowledge Service Firm", Journal of the Korea contents association, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp.19-30, 2016 https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.07.019
  15. Kim, Jae-Ha, Kim, Jung-Suk, "A Study for Supporting Plan to Revitalizing of Online-Game", Journal of Korea Game Society Vol.14. No.4, pp.53-66, 2014 https://doi.org/10.7583/JKGS.2014.14.4.53
  16. Hyun Joong Yoon, Jeong Min Choi, "Technological Change and Human Resource Development : Focusing on the 4th Industrial Revolution and its Change", Korean Journal of Resources Development, Vol. 21, No .4, pp.263-298, 2018 https://doi.org/10.24991/KJHRD.2018.12.21.4.263
  17. Jin-sook Kim, "The direction of human resources preparation to prepare for the fourth industrial revolution", Public Policy, No. 135, 18-21, 2017.