Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Graded levels of phytase on performance, bone mineralization and carcass traits of broiler fed reduced dicalcium phosphate

  • Received : 2018.03.19
  • Accepted : 2018.07.16
  • Published : 2019.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to assess increasing doses of phytase added to broiler diets formulated with different levels of available phosphorus (avP), calcium (Ca), and sodium (Na), and the respective effects on performance parameters, quantitative carcass characteristics, ash and phosphorus deposition in tibia and weight of organs. Methods: Three different matrices were assumed for phytase with the following nutritional values: matrix A (MT A): 0.165% Ca, 0.150% avP, and 0.035% Na; matrix B (MT B): 0.215% Ca, 0.195% avP, and 0.045% Na; matrix C (MT C): 0.245% Ca, 0.225% avP, and 0.053% Na. There were six different diets: No phytase (formulated to meet the nutritional requirements); phytase 500 FTU/kg+MT A; phytase 1,000 FTU/kg+MT A; phytase 1,500 FTU/kg+MT A; phytase 1,000 FTU/kg+MT B and phytase 1,500 FTU/kg+MT C. Results: There was no significant phytase influence on performance, quantitative carcass characteristics, ash and phosphorus deposition in tibia and weight of the organ throughout the study period, however, it was possible to observe a tendency of improvement in body weight corrected feed conversion for broilers fed the phytase 1,500+MT C diet, where potentially these birds were more efficient on utilize phytic phosphorus and other nutrients bounded to phytate molecule, translating into improvement in performance, and there was also a non significant numerical improvement in body weight corrected feed conversion of broilers fed this diet. Conclusion: Broilers fed with diets formulated with different levels of avP, Ca, and Na and increasing doses of phytase have shown no change on performance, quantitative carcass characteristics, ash and phosphorus deposition in tibia and weight of organs.

Keywords

References

  1. Waldroup PW. Bioassays remain necessary to estimate phosphorus, calcium bioavailability. Feedstuffs 1996;68:13-23.
  2. Underwood EJ. The mineral nutrition of liverstock. 2nd ed. London, UK: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureau; 1981.
  3. Lehninger AL, Nelson DL, Cox MM. Principios de bioquimica. 3rded. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Sarvier; 2002.
  4. Abelson PH. A potential phosphate crisis. Science 1999;283( 5410):2015. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5410.2015
  5. Powel S, Johnston S, Gaston L, Southern LL. The effect of dietary phosphorus level and phytase supplementation on growth performance, bone-breaking strength, and litter phosphorus concentration in broilers. Poult Sci 2008;87:949-57. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00291
  6. Adeola O, Cowieson AJ. BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve non-ruminant animal production. J Anim Sci 2011;89:3189-218. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3715
  7. Lei X, Ku PK, Miller ER, Ullrey DE, Yokoyama MT. Supplemental microbial phytase improves bioavailability of dietary zinc to weanling pigs. J Nutr 1993;123:1117-23.
  8. Selle PH, Cowieson AJ, Ravindran V. Consequences of calcium interactions with phytate and phytase for poultry and pigs. Livest Sci 2009;124:126-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.01.006
  9. Ravindran V, Cabahug S, Ravindran G, Selle PH, Bryden WL. Response of broiler chickens to microbial phytase supplementation as influenced by dietary phytic acid and non-phytate phosphorous levels. II. Effects on apparent metabolisable energy, nutrient digestibility and nutrient retention. Br Poult Sci 2000;41:193-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660050022263
  10. Karadas F, Pirgozliev V, Pappas AC, Acamovic T, Bedford MR. Effects of different dietary phytase activities on the concentration of antioxidants in the liver of growing broilers. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 2010;94:519-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2009.00938.x
  11. Bedford MR. Alternate uses of phytase-Superdosing. Asian Poultry Magazine; 2012. pp. 8-11.
  12. Walk CL, Bedford MR, McElroy AP. Influence of limestone and phytase on broiler performance, gastrointestinal pH, and apparent ileal nutrient digestibility. Poult Sci 2012;91:1371-8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01928
  13. Gehring CK, Bedford MR, Dozier WA. Extra-phosphoric effects of phytase with and without xilanase in corn-soybean meal-based diets fed to broilers. Poult Sci 2013;92:979-91. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02769
  14. Bradbury EJ, Wilkinson SJ, Cronin GM, Walk CL, Cowieson AJ. Effects of phytase, calcium source, calcium concentration and particle size on broiler performance, nutrient digestibility and skeletal integrity. Anim Prod Sci 2016;58:271-83. https://doi.org/10.1071/an16175
  15. Rostagno HS, Albino LF, Donzele JL, et al. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suinos. Composicao de alimentos e exigencias nutricionais. 3rd ed. Vicosa, MG, Brazil: UFV; 2011. 141 p.
  16. Sakomura NK, Rostagno HS. Research methods in monogastric nutrition. Jaboticabal, Sao Paulo, Brazil: Funep; 2007.
  17. Patricio IS, Mendes AA, Ramos AA, Pereira DF. Overview on the performance of brazilian broilers (1990 to 2009). Braz J Poult Sci 2012;14:233-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2012000400001
  18. Silva DJ, Queiroz AC. Food analysis. 3rd ed. Vicosa, MG, Brazil:UFV, 2002.
  19. Santos LM, Rodrigues PB, Alvarenga RR, et al. Calcium and available phosphorus levels in diets supplemented with phytase for broilers in the growing and finishing phases. R Bras Zootec 2011;40:2486-95. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001100029
  20. Olukosi AO, Kong C, Fru-Nji F, et al. Assessment of a bacterial 6-phytase in the diets of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2013;92:2101-8. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-03005
  21. Fukuyama EH, Sajomura NK, Dourado LR, et al. Effect of phytase suplementation on performance and nutrient digestibility in diets of broilers. R Bras Zootec 2008;37:629-35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008000400007
  22. Santos FR, Hruby M, Pierson EE, Remus JC, Sakomura NK. Effect of phytase supplementation in diets on nutrient digestibility and performance in broiler chicks. J Appl Poult Res 2008;17:191-201. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2007-00028
  23. Liu N, Ru Y, Wang J, Xu T. Effect of dietary sodium phytate and microbial phytase on the lipase activity and lipid metabolism of broiler chickens. Br J Nutr 2010;103:862-8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509992558
  24. Campasino A, York T, Wyatt C, Bedford MR, Dozier WA. Effect of increasing supplemental phytase concentration in diets fed to Hubbard x Cobb 500 male broilers from 1 to 42 days of age. J Appl Poult Res 2014;23:705-14. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2014-00999
  25. Gomide EM, Rodrigues PB, Bertechini AG, et al. Diets with reduced crude protein, calcium and phosphorus levels with phytase and amino acids for broiler chickens. R Bras Zootec 2011;40:2405-14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001100018
  26. Onyango EM, Bedford MR, Odeola O. Efficacy of an evolved Escherichia coli phytase in diets of broiler chicks. Poult Sci 2005;84:248-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.2.248
  27. Laurentiz AC, Junqueira OM, Filardi RS, et al. Effects of the enzyme phytase addition on diets for broiler chicken with reduction the levels of phosphorus in the different phases of creation. R Bras Zootec 2007;8:207-16.
  28. Nunes JK, Goncalves FM, Dallmann HM, et al. Development of the digestive tract of broilers fed diets containing sweet potato meal. Arch Zootec 2011;60:1105-14. https://doi.org/10.4321/S0004-05922011000400026
  29. Gomide EM, Rodrigues PB, Freitas RT, Fialho ET. Nutritional plans with use of amino acids and phytase for broiler chickens maintaining the ideal protein profile in the diets. R Bras Zootec 2007;36:1769-74. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982007000800009

Cited by

  1. Nutritional cost reduction and increase profitability in commercial broiler production using phytase superdosing vol.50, 2019, https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5020200031
  2. Effect of sodium sources and exogenous phytase supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and digesta pH of 21-day-old broilers vol.100, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101467