A study on the feasibility evaluation technique of urban utility tunnel by using quantitative indexes evaluation and benefit·cost analysis

정량적 지표평가와 비용·편익 분석을 활용한 도심지 공동구의 타당성 평가기법 연구

Abstract

If a new utility tunnel is planned for high density existing urban areas in Korea, a rational decision-making process such as the determination of optimum design capacity by using the feasibility evaluation system based on quantitative evaluation indexes and the economic evaluation is needed. Thus, the previous study presented the important weight of individual higher-level indexes (3 items) and sub-indexes (16 items) through a hierarchy analysis (AHP) for quantitative evaluation index items, considering the characteristics of each urban type. In addition, an economic evaluation method was proposed considering 10 benefit items and 8 cost items by adding 3 new items, including the effects of traffic accidents, noise reduction and socio-economic losses, to the existing items for the benefit cost analysis suitable for urban utility tunnels. This study presented a quantitative feasibility evaluation method using the important weight of 16 sub-index items such as the road management sector, public facilities sector and urban environment sector. Afterwards, the results of quantitative feasibility and economic evaluation were compared and analyzed in 123 main road sections of the Seoul. In addition, a comprehensive evaluation method was proposed by the combination of the two evaluation results. The design capacity optimization program, which will be developed by programming the logic of the quantitative feasibility and economic evaluation system presented in this study, will be utilized in the planning and design phases of urban community zones and will ultimately contribute to the vitalization of urban utility tunnels.

밀집도가 높은 국내 기존 도심지를 대상으로 공동구를 새로이 계획할 경우에는 정량적 평가지표에 의한 타당성 평가시스템과 경제성 평가를 이용한 최적 설계용량 결정 등의 합리적인 의사결정 과정이 필요하다. 그러므로 이전 연구에서는 도심지 유형별 특성을 고려한 의사결정 계층구조를 구성하고 정량적 평가지표 항목에 대한 계층의사분석(AHP)을 통해서 개별 상위지표(3개) 부문과 하위지표(16개) 항목의 중요도 가중치를 제시하였다. 또한 도심지 공동구에 적합한 비용 편익 분석을 위해서 교통사고 감소효과, 차량소음 저감효과, 사회 경제적 손실 등의 3개 항목을 새로이 추가하여 10개의 편익 항목, 8개의 비용 항목을 고려한 경제성 평가방법이 제시되었다. 본 연구는 도로관리, 공공시설, 도시환경 부문의 하위 16개 평가지표의 중요도 가중치를 활용한 정량적 타당성 평가방법을 제시하고 서울시 주간선도로 123개 구간을 대상으로 타당성 평가를 실시하였다. 또한 타당성 평가결과와 경제성 평가결과를 비교하여 문제점을 분석하고 두 평가결과의 조합에 의한 종합평가 방법을 제시하였다. 본 연구에서 제시된 정량적 타당성 평가와 경제성 평가시스템의 로직을 프로그래밍하여 개발할 예정인 설계용량 최적화 프로그램은 도심지 공동구의 계획 및 설계 단계에서 활용되며 궁극적으로 도심지 공동구 활성화에 기여하게 될 것이다.

Fig. 1. Graph of quantitative indexes evaluation and B/C analysis for the urban utility tunnel

Fig. 2. Graph of combined feasibility evaluation score for the urban utility tunnel

Fig. 3. Graph of combined feasibility evaluation of the urban utility tunnel on high-rank 20 sectors

Fig. 4. A planning program of urban utility tunnel considering feasibility and economic evaluation

Table 1. Result of a study on the quantitative feasibility evaluation index by AHP analysis (Chung and Na, 2018)

Table 2. Evaluation items of benefit ‧ cost ratio analysis for the urban utility tunnel (Cho et al., 2018)

Table 3. Result of a study on the quantitative feasibility evaluation index by AHP analysis

Table 3. Result of a study on the quantitative feasibility evaluation index by AHP analysis (continue)

Table 4. Consideration main road-lines and sectors for quantitative indexes and economic evaluation in Seoul

Table 5. Consideration main road-lines and sectors for quantitative indexes and economic evaluation in Seoul

Table 6. Quantitative indexes and economic evaluation on high rank 20 sectors

Table 6. Quantitative indexes and economic evaluation on high rank 20 sectors (continue)

Table 7. Combined feasibility evaluation of the urban utility tunnel on high rank 20 sectors

Table 7. Combined feasibility evaluation of the urban utility tunnel on high rank 20 sectors (continue)