식품과학과 산업 (Food Science and Industry)

한국식품과학회 (Korean Society of Food Science and Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

반복섭취 실험설계를 활용한 신제품의 시장성 평가

Application of repeated exposure design for new product development

  • 정서진 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Chung, Seo-Jin (Department of Nutritional Science and Food Management, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2019.02.13
  • 심사 : 2019.03.03
  • 발행 : 2019.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본고에서는 제품개발을 위한 소비자 조사에서 반복섭취 설계를 적용하는 접근법에 대해 살펴보았다. 제품에 대한 소비자 기호도는 비교적 역동적으로 변화할 수 있어 1회적 기호도 평가는 신제품에 대한 장기적 기호도 예측에 한계가 있다. 특히 시장이 형성되지 않은 제품군의 신제품에 대한 소비자의 기호도를 측정하기 위해서는 반복섭취 설계가 유용할 수 있다. 식품에 대한 반복섭취 설계는 익숙한 식품보다는 새로운 식품에서의 기호도 형성을 연구하는 것이 효과적이다. 다만 반복섭취 설계에 특성상 비교적 오랜 시간이 소요되기 때문에 실험진행자와 대상자 모두에게 어려운 설계이기도 하다. 향후 장기적인 기호도 변화에 대한 보다 빠르고 정확한 예측이 가능한 실험기법의 개발이 필요한 실정이다.

The present article covers a brief introduction on how repeated exposure design can be utilized for developing new food products. A generic consumer taste test which measures consumer acceptance in one trial may have limitation in predicting long-term acceptability of a product. The article describes the changes in food preference and choice during the course of life from infants to elderly. Then, several possible theories that proposes to delineate the underlying mechanisms for acquiring the liking for food is introduced. The article also discusses general experimental design, case studies which adopted repeated exposure design, the limitations and rapid test methods to predict long-term acceptance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Addessi, E, Galloway AT, Visalberghi E, Birch LL. Specific social influences on the acceptance of novel foods in 2-5-year-old children. Public Health Nutr. 7: 295-302 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1079/PHN2003527
  2. Aldridge V, Dovey TM, Halford JCG. The role of familiarity in dietary development. Dev. Rev. 29: 32-44 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2008.11.001
  3. Baeyens F, Eelen P, Van den Bergh O, Crombez G. Flavor-flavor and color-flavor conditioning in humans. Learn. Motiv. 21: 434-455 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1016/0023-9690(90)90025-J
  4. Berlyne DE. Aesthetics and Psychobiology. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts (1971)
  5. Brunstrom JM, Mitchell GL. Flavor-nutrient learning in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Physiol. Behav. 90: 133-141 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.09.016
  6. Birch LL, Marlin DW. I don't like it; I never tried it: Effects of exposure on two-year-old children's food preferences. Appetite 3: 353-360 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(82)80053-6
  7. Bobowski N, Rendahl A, Vickers Z. A longitudinal comparison of two salt reduction strategies: Acceptability of a low sodium food depends on the consumer. Food Qual. Prefer. 40B: 270-278 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.07.019
  8. Carpenter GS, Nakamoto, K. Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. J. Marketing Res. 26: 285-298 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378902600303
  9. Chung S-J Vickers Z. Influence of sweetness on the sensory-specific satiety and long-term acceptability of tea. Food Qual. Prefer. 18: 256-264 (2007a) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.12.002
  10. Chung S-J Vickers Z. Long term acceptability and choice of teas differing in sweetness. Food Qual. Prefer. 18: 963-974 (2007b) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.03.011
  11. Costa MP, Balthazar CF, Franco RM, Marsico ET, Cruz AG, Conte CA Jr. Changes on expected taste perception of probiotic and conventional yogurts made from goat milk after rapidly repeated exposure. J. Dairy Sci. 97: 2610-2618 (2014) https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7617
  12. Cowart BJ. Development of taste perception in humans: Sensitivity and preference throughout the life span. Psychological Bulletin 90: 43-73 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.90.1.43
  13. Crandall CS. The liking of foods as a result of exposure: Eating doughnuts in Alaska. J. Soc. Psychol. 125: 187-194 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1985.9922871
  14. Dalenberg, J. R., Nanetti, L., Renken, R. J., de Wijk, R. A., & ter Horst, G. J. (2014). Dealing with consumer differences in liking during repeated exposure to food; typical dynamics in rating behavior. PLoS One, 9, e93350 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093350
  15. Dermiki M. Prescott J, Sargent LJ, Willway J, Gosney MA, Methven L. Novel flavours paired with glutamate condition increased intake in older adults in the absence of changes of liking. Appetite 90: 108-113 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.002
  16. Galak J, Redden JP. The Properties and Antecedents of Hedonic Decline. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 69:1-25 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011542
  17. Ghawi SK, Rowland I, Methven L. Enhancing consumer liking of low salt tomato soup over repeated exposure by herb and spice seasonings. Appetite 81: 20-29 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.05.029
  18. Go J, Kim M, Chung S. Acquired (dis)liking of natural cheese in different repeated exposure environment. Food Res. Int. 99:403-412 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.031
  19. Guinard JX, Brun P. Sensory-specific satiety: comparison of taste and texture effects. Appetite 31:141-157 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1998.0159
  20. Heymann H & Lawless HT. Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices (2nd ed.). New York: Springer (Chapter 9). (2010)
  21. Hoek AC, Elzerman JE, Hageman R, Kok FJ, Luning PA, Graaf Cd. Are meat substitutes liked better over time? A repeated in-home use test with meat substitutes or meat in meals. Food Qual. Prefer. 28:253-263 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.07.002
  22. Homa D, Cultice JC. Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion on the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10: 83-94 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.83
  23. Ishii R, O'Mahony M. Use of multiple standards to define sensory characteristics for descriptive analysis: Aspects of concept formation. J. Food Sci. 56: 838-842. (1991) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1991.tb05395.x
  24. Koster EP. Diversity in the determinants of food choice: A psychological perspective, Food quality and preference, 20, 70-82 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.002
  25. Koster EP, Mojet J. Boredom and the reasons why some new products fail. In H. J. H. MacFie (Ed.), Consumer-led food product development. Abbington, Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing. (2007)
  26. Kremer S, Shimojo R, Holthuysen N, Koster EP, Mojet J. Consumer acceptance of salt-reduced "soy sauce" foods over rapidly repeated exposure. Food Qual. Prefer. 27:179- (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.06.002
  27. Larson JS, Redden JP, Elder RS. Satiation from sensory simulation: Evaluating foods decreases enjoyment of similar foods. J. Consumer Psychol. 24 (2): 188-194 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.09.001
  28. Levy CM, Koster EP. The relevance of initial hedonic judgements in the prediction of subtle food choices. Food Qual. Prefer. 10: 185-200 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00016-6
  29. Mai R, Hoffmann S, Hoppert K, Schwarz P, Rohm H. The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak: The moderating effect of implicit associations on healthy eating behaviors. Food Qual. Prefer. 39: 62-72 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.014
  30. Mennella JA, Nicklaus S, Jagolino AL, Yourshaw LM. Variety is the spice of life: Strategies for promoting fruit and vegetable acceptance during infancy. Physiol. Behav. 94: 29-28 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.11.014
  31. Methven L, Langreney E, Prescott J. Changes in liking for a no added salt soup as a function of exposure. Food Qual. Prefer. 26: 135-140 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.04.012
  32. Morlein D, Schiermann C, Meier-Dinkel L, Trautmann J, Wigger R, Buttinger G, Wicke, M. Effects of context and repeated exposure on food liking: The case of boar taint. Food Res. Int. 67: 390-399 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.11.037
  33. Nicklaus S, Boggio V, Chabanet C, Issanchou S. A prospective study of food preferences in childhood. Food Qual. Prefer. 15: 805-818 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.02.010
  34. Nu CT, MacLeod P, Barthelemy J. Effects of age and gender on adolescents' food habits and preferences. Food Qual. Prefer. 7: 251-262 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(96)00023-7
  35. Pliner P. The effects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite 3: 283-290 (1982) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(82)80026-3
  36. Porcherot C, Issanchou S. Dynamics of liking for flavoured crackers: Test of predictive value of a boredom test. Food Qual. Prefer. 9: 21-29 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(97)00023-2
  37. Reverdy C, Schlich P, Koster EP, Ginon E, Lange C. Effect of sensory education on food preferences in children. Food Qual. Prefer. 21: 794-804 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.03.008
  38. Rolls BJ. Sensory‐specific satiety. Nutr. Rev. 44: 93-101 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.1986.tb07593.x
  39. Rozin P. Chap 2. The integration of biological, social, cultural, and psychological influences on food choice. In The Psychology of Food Choice, Shepherd R, Raats R. ed. Biddles LTd. (2006)
  40. Schwartz C, Vandenberghe-Descamps M, Sulmont-Rosse C, Tournier C, Feron G. Behavioral and physiological determinants of food choice and consumption at sensitive periods of the life span, a focus on infants and elderly. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 46:91-106 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.09.008
  41. Soerensen JG, Waehrens SS, Byrne DV. Predicting and understanding long‐term consumer liking of standard versus novel chocolate: A repeated exposure study. J Sensory Stud. 30: 370-380 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.12164
  42. Song R, Chung S, Cho SA, Shin HW, Harmayani E. Learning to know what you like: A case study of repeated exposure to ethnic flavors. Food Qual. Prefer. 71:452-462 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.08.021
  43. Stolzenbach S, Bredie WLP, Christensen RHB, Byrne DV. Impact of product information and repeated exposure on consumer liking, sensory perception and concept associations of local apple juice. Food Res. Int. 52: 144-152 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.030
  44. Tu VP, Valentin D, Husson F, Dacremont C. Cultural differences in food description and preference: contrasting Vietnamese and French panelists on soy yogurts. Food Qual Prefer. 21:602-610 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.03.009
  45. Vickers Z, Holton E. A comparison of taste test ratings, repeated consumption, and post consumption ratings of different strengths of iced tea. J Sensory Stud. 13: 199-212 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1998.tb00083.x
  46. Wardle J, Herrera M-L, Cooke L, Gibson EL. Modifying children's food preferences: the effects of exposure and reward on acceptance of an unfamiliar vegetable. Eur. J. Clinical Nutr. 57: 341-348 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601541
  47. Weijzen PLG, Zandstra EH, Alfieri C, de Graaf C. Effects of complexity and intensity on sensory specific satiety and food acceptance after repeated consumption. Food Qual. Prefer. 19: 349-359 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.003
  48. Willems AA, van Hout DHA, Zijlstra N, Zandstra EH. Effects of salt labelling and repeated in-home consumption on long-term liking of reduced-salt soups. Public Health Nutri. 17: 1130-1137 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980013001055
  49. Zajonc RB. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Pers Soc. Psychol. 9: 1-32 (1968) https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
  50. Zeinstra GG, Koelen MA, Kok FJ, de Graaf C. Children's hard-wired aversion to pure vegetable tastes. A 'failed' flavour-nutrient learning study. Appetite 52: 528-530 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.11.006