DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Phytoplankton Ecosystems at Oil Spill Coasts Including the Hebei Spirit Oil Spill Site Near Taeanhaean National Park, Korea 1. Interannual Variability of Phytoplankton Community in Summer

태안해안국립공원 인근의 허베이스피리트 사고를 포함한 유류유출 해역의 식물플랑크톤 생태계 1. 하계 식물플랑크톤 군집의 연변동

  • Yih, Wonho (Department of Marine Biotechnology, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyung Seop (Department of Marine Biotechnology, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Jo, Soo-Gun (Department of Marine Biotechnology, Kunsan National University)
  • 이원호 (군산대학교 해양과학대학 해양생물공학과) ;
  • 김형섭 (군산대학교 해양과학대학 해양생물공학과) ;
  • 조수근 (군산대학교 해양과학대학 해양생물공학과)
  • Received : 2018.11.15
  • Accepted : 2019.02.12
  • Published : 2019.03.30

Abstract

Right after the 2007 Hebei Spirit Oil Spill phytoplankton ecosystems were investigated for 11 years based on the seasonal monitoring of the composition and abundance of phytoplankton species. Comparable time-series data from the 1989 Exxon Valdez or the 2010 Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill sites were not available. It was suggested that the ecological healthiness of phytoplankton ecosystems at EVOS sites had recovered after 10 years following the oil spill based on chlorophyll concentrations even though these concentrations only represented phytoplankton communities in most cases. Chlorophyll concentrations can only reflect limited aspects of highly complex phytoplankton ecosystems. During the last 11 years following the 2017 HSOS, extreme variabilities were met in the seasonally averaged ratios of diatoms to phototrophic flagellates including dinoflagellates based on the microscopic cell countings. Summer phytoplankton communities exhibited some cyclic interannual changes in dominant groups every 2-4 years. During the early years (2008-2010) cryptophytes or raphidophytes (Chattonella spp.) dominated alternately each year, which was repeated again in 2014, 2015 and 2017. Two thecate dinoflagellates, Tripos fusus and Tripos furca, together accounted for 52.5% and 50.0% of all organisms in the summers of 2011 and 2012, respectively, which was repeated again in 2018. Summer occurrence and dominance by the phototrophic flagellates including HABs (Harmful Algal Blooms) species as well as their interannual variabilities in the oil spill sites could be utilized as markers for the stable and long-term management of healthy ecosystems. For this type of scientific ecosystem management monitoring of chlorophyll concentrations may sometimes be insufficient to gain a proper and comprehensive understanding of phytoplankton communities located in areas where oil spills have occurred and harmed the ecosystem.

Keywords

HOGBB1_2019_v41n1_1_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Location of the 15 sampling stations in the coastal waters of the Taeanhaean National Park

HOGBB1_2019_v41n1_1_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Interannual variations in the accumulated annual frequency points (3 points for the first dominant species, 2 point for the second, and 1 point for the third in a season) for the three groups such as diatoms, dinoflagellates and others at the coastal waters of the Taeanhaean National Park for the first 10 years following the 2007 HSOS (Hebei Spirit Oil Spill)

HOGBB1_2019_v41n1_1_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Abundance based percent dominance of top 3−6 dominant phytoplankton species in each seasonal cruise covering 15 stations at the coastal waters of the Taeanhaean National Park in 2015

HOGBB1_2019_v41n1_1_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Relative composition of diatom groups (blue bar) and phototrophic flagellate groups (green bar) in terms of summer-averaged cell abundances from microscopic cell counts at the coastal waters of the Taeanhaean National Park for the first 11 years following the 2007 HSOS (Hebei Spirit Oil Spill). Pink arrows indicate the years with cryptophyte and raphidophytes as the top dominants while green arrows indicate the years with two thecate dinoflagellates species, Tripos fusus and Tripos furca as top dominant flagellates

HOGBB1_2019_v41n1_1_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Relative composition of diatom groups (blue bar) and dinoflagellate groups (brown bar) in terms of summer-averaged cell abundances from microscopic cell counts at the coastal waters of the Taeanhaean National Park for the first 11 years following the 2007 HSOS (Hebei Spirit Oil Spill). Pink triangle in the left side (for the year 2008−2010) represent the portion occupied by the sum of cryptophyte and raphidophytes. Yellow arrow emphasizes the “second” predominance by the two thecate dinoflagellates species, Tripos fusus and Tripos furca. following the same “first peak” in 2012

Table 1. Sample-averaged total phytoplankton abundance in 30 samples from each cruise covering 15 stations at the coastal waters of the Taeanhaean National Park for the first 10 years following the 2007 HSOS (Hebei Spirit Oil Spill)

HOGBB1_2019_v41n1_1_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Top three dominant phytoplankton species based on sample-averaged total abundance in each cruise covering 15 stations at the coastal waters of the Taeanhaean National Park for the first 11 years following the 2007 HSOS (Hebei Spirit Oil Spill)

HOGBB1_2019_v41n1_1_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. National Institute of Fisheries Science (2018) NIFS Serial Oceanographic observation - Outline - Locations of the NIFS Serial Oceanographic observation. http://www.nifs.go.kr/kodc/soo_summary.kodc Accessed 8 Oct 2018
  2. Oil Pollution Research Center of National Park Research Institute (2018) Presentations for the 10th year final report of the "Long-term monitoring on the ecosystem change following the HSOS(Hebei Spirit Oil Spill). Oil Pollution Research Center of National Park Research Institute, Wonju, 237 p
  3. Shim JH (1994) Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna and flora of Korea, Vol. 34 Marine phytoplankton. Ministry of Education, Seoul, 487 p
  4. Yih W (2018) Marine phytoplankton. In: Oil Pollution Research Center, National Park Research Institute of Korea National Park Service (eds) Presentations for the 10th year final report of the "Long-term monitoring on the ecosystem change following the HSOS(Hebei Spirit Oil Spill). Oil Pollution Research Center of National Park Research Institute, Wonju, pp 31-42
  5. Yih W, Park JW, Kim HS (2018) Phytohydrographic plankton researches at the surrounding seas in the first half of 20 century. In: Program and Abstract of the Fall meeting of the Korea Society of Oceanography, BPEX, Busan, 24-25 Oct 2018, pp 364-365
  6. Batten S, Campbell R, Doroff A, Holderied K, Hopcroft R, Weingartner T (2015) Environmental drivers: regional variability in oceanographic patterns across the Gulf of Alaska. In: Neher TH, Ballachey B, Hoffman K, Holderied K, Hopcroft R, Lindeberg M, McCammon M, Weingartner T (eds) Quantifying temporal and spatial ecosystem variability across the northern Gulf of Alaska to understand mechanisms of change. Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council, Anchorage, pp 2-1-2-53
  7. CalCOFI (2018a) Phytoplankton species composition, California Current (CalCOFI Cruises). The California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations. https://oceaninformatics.ucsd.edu/datazoo/catalogs/ccelter/datasets/254 Accessed 9 Oct 2018
  8. CalCOFI (2018b) About CalCOFI. California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations. http://calcofi.org/aboutcalcofi.html Accessed 9 Oct 2018
  9. Chihara M, Murano M (1997) An illustrated guide to marine plankton in Japan. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, 1574 p (in Japanese)
  10. Collinsworth DW, Stieglitz W, Barton MA, Pennoyer S (1989) State/Federal natural resource damage assessment and restoration plan for the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill. Trustee Council, Anchorage, 258 p
  11. Davies CH, Coughlan A, Hallegraeff G, Ajani P, Armbrecht L, Atkins N, Bonham P, Brett S, Brinkman R, Burford M, Clementson L, Coad P, Coman F, Davies D, Dela-Cruz J, Devlin M, Edgar S, Eriksen R, Furnas M, Hassler C, Hill D, Holmes M, Ingleton T, Jameson I, Sophie CL, Lonborg C, McLaughlin J, McEnnulty F, McKinnon AD, Miller M, Murray S, Nayar S, Patten R, Pausina SA, Pritchard T, Proctor R, Purcell-Meyerink D, Raes E, Rissik D, Ruszczyk J, Slotwinski A, Swadling KM, Tattersall K, Thompson P, Thomson P, Tonks M, Trull TW, Uribe-Palomino J, Waite AM, Yauwenas R, Zammit A, Richardson AJ (2016) Data descriptor: a database of marine phytoplankton abundance, biomass and species composition in Australian waters. Sci Data 3:160111. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.43
  12. Department of Agriculture and Fishery (1930) Oceanographic investigation (January-June 1930), Semi-annual Report No. 46. The Imperial Fisheries Experimental Station, Tokyo, 267 p (in Japanese)
  13. Dodge JD (1982) Marine dinoflagellates of the British Isles. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 303 p
  14. Fattal P, Maanan M, Tillier I, Rollo N, Robin M, Pottier P (2010) Coastal vulnerability to oil spill pollution: the case of Noirmoutier Island (France). J Coastal Res 26(5):879-887 https://doi.org/10.2112/08-1159.1
  15. Fisher CR, Montagna PA, Sutton TT (2016) How did the deepwater horizon oil spill impact deep-sea ecosystems? Oceanography 29(3):182-195 https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2016.82
  16. Garmendia M, Borja A, Franco J, Revilla M (2012) Phytoplankton composition indicators for the assessment of eutrophication in marine waters: present state and challenges within the European directives. Mar Pollut Bull 15:7-16
  17. Harwell MA, Gentile JH, Cummins KW, Highsmith RC, Hilborn R, Mcroy CP, Weingartner T (2010) Human and ecological risk assessment : a conceptual model of natural and anthropogenic drivers and their influence on the Prince William Sound, Alaska, eosystem. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 16(4):672-726 https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2010.501011
  18. Kim D, Yang G, Min S, Koh C (2014) Social and ecological impacts of the Hebei Spirit oil spill on the west coast of Korea: implications for compensation and recovery. Ocean Coast Manage 102:533-544 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.05.023
  19. Korea Coast Guard (2008) Korea Coast Guard 2008 White Paper. Amigodesign, Incheon, 523 p
  20. McCammon M, Hoffman K, Holderied K, Aderhold DR, Neher TH (2018) Long-term monitoring of marine conditions and injured resources and services. Trustee Council, Anchorage, 112 p
  21. McRoy CP, Ward A, Simpson EP, Tamburello K, Cameron J, McCullough S, Cassidy P (1996) Sound ecosystem analysis: phytoplankton and nutrients. Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska, Restoration Project 95320G, 27 p
  22. McRoy CP, Simpson EP, Tamburello K, Ward A, Cameron J (1999) Sound ecosystem analysis: phytoplankton and nutrients. Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska, Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Restoration Project Final Report 98320G, 48 p
  23. Neher TH, Ballachey B, Hoffman K, Holderied K, Hopcroft R, Lindeberg M, McCammon M, Weingartner T (2015) Quantifying temporal and spatial ecosystem variability across the northern Gulf of Alaska to understand mechanisms of change. Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council, Anchorage, 247 p
  24. Newton JA, Horner RA (2003) Use of phytoplankton species indicators to track the origin of phytoplankton blooms in Willapa Bay, Washington. Estuaries 26:1071-1078 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803364
  25. Parsons ML, Morrison W, Rabalais NN, Turner RE, Tyre KN (2015) Phytoplankton and the Macondo oil spill: a comparison of the 2010 phytoplankton assemblage to baseline conditions on the Louisiana shelf. Environ Pollut 207:152-160 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.09.019
  26. Republic of the Marshall Islands Maritime Administrator (2011) Deepwater horizon marine casualty investigation report. Office of the Maritime Administrator, Virginia, 216 p
  27. Tomas CR (1997) Identifying marine phytoplankton. Academic Press, San Diego, 858 p
  28. Venrick EL (1998) Spring in the California Current: the distribution of phytoplankton species, April 1993 and April 1995. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 167:73-88 https://doi.org/10.3354/meps167073
  29. Venrick EL (2009) Floral patterns in the California Current: the coastal offshore boundary zone. J Mar Res 67:89-111 https://doi.org/10.1357/002224009788597917
  30. Venrick EL (2012) Phytoplankton in the California Current system off southern California: changes in a changing environment. Prog Oceanogr 104:44-58 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2012.05.005
  31. Venrick EL (2015) Phytoplankton species in the California Current System off Southern California: the spatial dimensions. Cal Coop Ocean Fish 56:168-184
  32. Ward A (1997) A temporal study of the phytoplankton spring bloom in Prince William Sound, Alaska. M.S. Thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, 85 p