DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경영형태별 산지 초지의 생산성 및 사료가치 비교 연구

Comparative Study on the Productivity and Quality of Hilly Pasture by Management type

  • 김종근 (서울대학교 국제농업기술대학원) ;
  • 유창 (서울대학교 국제농업기술대학원) ;
  • 조국강 (서울대학교 국제농업기술대학원) ;
  • 박형수 (국립축산과학원) ;
  • 정종성 (국립축산과학원)
  • 투고 : 2019.03.14
  • 심사 : 2019.03.18
  • 발행 : 2019.03.31

초록

본 시험은 목장 경영형태에 따른 산지초지 조성시 생산성과 사료가치의 변화를 관찰하기 위하여 수행되었다. 시험에 이용된 초지는 강원도 평창군에 위치한 서울대학교 평창캠퍼스의 시험목장내에 2014년 9월 3일에 조사료 생산형(Forage production type, FP; 오차드그라스 18 + 톨페스큐 12 + 티머시 5 + 화이트클로버 5 kg/ha) 초지와 공공 목장형 (Public farm type, PF; 오차드그라스 12 + 톨페스큐 18 + 티머시 5 + 화이트클로버 5 kg/ha) 초지를 각각 0.5ha씩 조성을 하여 매년 4회 수확 또는 방목을 실시하였으며 파종된 목초의 생육특성, 수량 및 사료가치를 조사하였다. 초장은 화본과목초는 1차 수확시 가장 길었으며 두과목초는 2차 수확시에 가장 길었다. 건물함량은 매년 1차 수확시 가장 높았으며 2차 수확시 유의적으로 낮았다 (p<0.05). 그러나 2년차에서는 2차, 3차 및 4차 수확에 따른 차이는 없었다 (p>0.05). 식생변화에 있어서는 조성이후 시간이 경과함에 따라 두과목초의 비율이 점차 증가되는 경향을 보였으며 2차 및 3차 수확시 잡초와 나지의 비율이 높았지만 4차 수확시는 줄어들었다. 생초 수량은 1년차 전 수확시기에서 목장 형태별 유의성이 있었으나 2년차에서는 유의적인 차이가 없었다. 건물 수량도 생초수량과 같은 경향을 보였으며 전체적으로는 조사료 생산형 초지의 수량이 유의적으로 높게 나타났다 (p<0.05). 공공목장형 초지의 가축 섭취량은 1년차에서는 1,452 kg/ha 이었으나 2년차에는 1,743 kg/ha로 더 높았으며 방목이용율은 3차 방목시 가장 높게 나타났다. 경영형태별 초지의 사료가치는 큰 차이가 없었으나 수확시기 간에는 차이가 나타났다. 조단백질 함량은 1차 수확시 가장 낮았으며 TND 함량은 1차 수확시 가장 높았고 RFV 값은 4차 수확시 가장 높았다. 이상의 결과를 종합하여 볼 때 한국형 산지초지 조성을 위해서는 현장 상황에 맞는 초지의 조성이 중요하며 생산성에 있어서는 조사료 생산형 모델이 더 우수한 것으로 나타났으며 도출된 결과들은 향후 공공목장형 초지 이용을 위한 기초 자료로 제공되었으면 한다.

This experiment was carried out to study the change of productivity and feed value in different types of hilly pasture. The pasture utilized in the experiment was placed on the experimental farm of Pyeongchang Campus of Seoul National University. Forage production type(FP; Orchardgrass 18 + Tall Fescue 12 + Timothy 5 + White clover 5 kg/ha) and Public farm type(PF: Orchardgrass 12 + Tall Fescue 18 + Timothy 5 + White clover 5 kg/ha) pasture were established in September 3, 2014 and utilized (cutting or grazing) four times every year. Growth characteristics, yield and forage quality were investigated for two years. Plant height of grasses was the highest in the $1^{st}$ cutting and legumes was in the $2^{nd}$ cutting. Dry matter (DM) content was highest at every the $1^{st}$ cut grasses significantly lower at the $2^{nd}$ harvest (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the $2^{nd}$, $3^{rd}$ and $4^{th}$ harvest in 2016. In the botanical composition change, the portion of legume was gradually increased after pasture establishment and the ratio of weed and bare land was higher at $2^{nd}$ and $3^{rd}$ cutting, but it was decreased at $4^{th}$ harvest. There was no significant difference in 2016 of fresh yield between two farm types (p>0.05). The yield of dry matter showed similar trend of fresh yield and forage production type was higher than that of public farm type (p<0.05). The forage intake by livestock was 1,452 kg/ha in 2015 and 1,743 kg/ha in 2016. Pasture utilization ratio of public farm type pasture was highest in the $3^{rd}$ grazing time. Forage quality of pasture in relation to management type had not significant difference, but there was difference in harvest times. Crude protein (CP) was the lowest in the $1^{st}$ harvest and total digestible nutrient (TDN) was highest in the $1^{st}$ harvest and lowest in the $4^{th}$ harvest. Based on the above results, it is found that the establishment of pasture suitable for farm's situation is important for set up of Korean model of hilly pasture. Although the forage production type is superior on forage productivity, it is recommended that the results will be provided as basic data for management of public farm type in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. A.O.A.C. 1995. Official method of analysis(15th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA. Washington D.C.
  2. Goering, H.K., and Van Soest, P.J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agic. Handbook 379, U. S. Government Print Office, Washington, D.C.
  3. Harkess, R.D., Battista, J. and Dickson, I.A. 1972. A portable corral technique for measuring the effect of grazing intensity on yield, quality, and intake of herbage. Journal of British Grassland Society. 27:145-153 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1972.tb00702.x
  4. Holland, C., Kezar, W., Kautz, W.P., Lazowski, E.J., Mahanna, W.C. and Reinhart, R. 1990. The Pioneer Forage Manual-A Nutritional Guide. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Des Moines, Iowa, USA.
  5. Holmes, W. 1982. GRASS; its production an utilization by the grazing animal. University College fo Walse. British grassland Society. pp. 137-138.
  6. Hur, D., Seok, H.D., Song, W.J., Min, K.T., Lee, Y.G. and Moon, J.M. 2014. The establishment of the technical development strategy to promote silvopastoral system. Rural Development Administration.
  7. ILEM. 2019. Annual meeting reports. Institute of livestock environmental management. Daejeon, Korea.
  8. Jeong, J.S., Kim, J.G., Kim, H.S., Ji, H.J., Choi, K.J., Choi, B.R., Oh, S.M., and Kim, W.H. 2018a. The effect of seeding dates on productivity and botanical composition in oversown hilly pasture of mixed grass, Pyeongchang of south Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 38:217-223. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2018.38.4.217
  9. Jeong, J.S., Kim, J.G., Kim, H.S., Park, H.S., Choi, K.C., Ji, H.J., Choi, K.J., and Oh, S.M. 2018b. The effect of seeding rate on productivity and botanical composition in oversown hilly pasture. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 38:30-38. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2018.38.1.30
  10. Ji, H.C., Lee, S.H., Kim, G.Y., Choi, G.J., Park, N.G. and Lee, K.W. 2013. Growth characteristics and productivity of new orchardgrass (Dactylis glumerata L.) cultivar. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 33:6-9. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2013.33.1.6
  11. Jo, I.H. 1994. The effect of cutting frequencies on botanical composition in permanent grassland. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 14:1-6.
  12. Jung, J.S., Kim, J.G., Kim, H.S., Park, H.S., Choi, K.C., Lee, S.H., Ji, H.J., Choi, G.J. and Kim, W.H. 2017. The effects of grass seed mixtures using domestic cultivars on botanical composition and dry matter productivity in low productive hilly pasture, central region of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 37:132-139. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2017.37.2.132
  13. Kim, J.G., Kim, H.J., Choi, S.K., Kim, M.J. and Kim, C.M. 2017. Development of techniques for the establishment and utilization on hilly pasture in Korea. Rural Development Administration.
  14. Kim, J.G., Li, Y.W., Kim, M.J., Kim, H.J., Jung, S.I., Jung, J.S. and Park, H.S. 2016. Effect of species and seed mixture on productivity, botanical composition and forage quality in middle mountainous pasture. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 36:135-141. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2016.36.2.135
  15. Kim, M.J., Cho, Y.M., Choi, S.H., Kim, Y.G., Yoon, S.H., Kim, J.G. and Yook, W.B. 2006. Effect of seed mixture on the forage yield and botanical composition in the Hanwoo grazing pasture. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 26:113-120. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2006.26.2.113
  16. Kim, S.H. and Kim, T.K. 2018. Economic valuation of Multi-functionality on an eco-pastoral system in alpine grassland. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 38:298-309. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2018.38.4.298
  17. Lee, H.W. 1992. Grassland establishment. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 12:94-102.
  18. Lee, H.W., Shin, J.S. and Shin, U.I. 1983. Study on the grazing behavior and animal production of Korean Native Cow in different grazing system at grasses dominant pasture. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 4:133-139.
  19. MAFRA. 2015. Workshop for activation of Hilly-eco livestock Industry. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.
  20. Moon, S.H., Kim, S.W., Choi, G.J., Jang, S.Y., Park, J.H., Jeon, B.T., Kim, M.H., Kim, S.J. and Oh, M.R. 2015. Current status of forage use on the goat farming in mountainous pasture. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 35:112-118. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2015.35.2.112
  21. Moore, J.E. 1970. Procedure for the two-stage in vitro digestion of forage. University of Florida, Department of Animal Science.
  22. SAS Institute, Inc. 1999. SAS user's guider : Statistics. SAS Inst., Inc.
  23. Shin, J.S., Park, G.J. and Lee, P.S. 1989. Trials of the utilization method in mixtures swards. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 9:96-102.
  24. Tilley, J.M. and Terry, R.A. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of British Grassland Society. 18:104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1963.tb00335.x
  25. Weinberger, P., Park, G.J. and Kwon, D.J. 1983. Korean woodlands (Im-ya) as resources for grassland development. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit.
  26. Yang, S.H., Yang, B.C., Chung, K.Y., Jang, S.S., Lee, E.M., CHo, S.R, Lee, S.D., Park, H.S. and Kwon, E.G. 2016. Effects of supplementation of trace nutrients on Hanwoo heifers (Bos taurus coreanae) under hilly pasture grazing system. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science. 36:387-392. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2016.36.4.387