Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management (한국건설관리학회논문집)

Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management (한국건설관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Improvement of CM Fee Estimation Criteria for Efficient CM Service

건설사업관리업무 효율화를 위한 대가 산출기준 개선방향

  • Received : 2018.11.14
  • Accepted : 2018.12.18
  • Published : 2019.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As the Construction Technology Promotion Act was revised in 2015, the term of Supervision was removed and Construction Management was included instead. The consideration of Construction Management shall be based on the cost plus fee method specified in the Criteria for the Cost of Construction Technology Services of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Nevertheless, it is based on the construction cost ratio in accordance with the Economy and Finance Ministry's Detailed Guidelines for Preparing the 2018 Budget Plan and Fund Management Plan (Manual for Business Type and Item). As a result, it has been expected that Construction Management consideration will be calculated according to a single government standard and that the Criteria will be applied reasonably. In addition, although the change in the Labor Standard Act has a significant effect on the working environment of the construction site, the nature of the construction site is not considered in this Act. Based on these problems, the study suggested that the government should apply a single standard after consultation with the relevant agencies when calculating the consideration for Construction management, that the scope of the Criteria for the Cost of Construction Technology Services should be clear, that the amount of input by the Construction Manager should be considered for the capability of engineers and the number of working days, and that construction characteristics should be considered when determining the number of working days and hours.

2015년에 건설기술진흥법이 전면 시행되면서 책임감리라는 표현이 없어지고 대신에 건설사업관리가 포함되었다. 건설사업관리 대가를 산정할 때는 국토교통부의 건설기술용역 대가기준에 명시된 실비정액가산방식에 근거해야 한다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 현업에서는 기획재정부의 예산편성지침에 따라 공사비요율에 근거하고 있다. 이로 인해 현장에서는 단일화된 정부기준에 따라 건설사업관리 대가가 산출되고, 건설기술용역 대가기준이 합리적으로 적용되기를 기대하고 있다. 또한 근로기준법령의 변경은 건설현장의 근무환경에 큰 영향을 미침에도 불구하고, 이 법령에 건설현장의 특성이 고려되지 않고 있다. 이에 건설기술진흥법령상의 대가산정 관련 규정이 검토되었고, 실비정액가산방식과 공사비요율방식에 의한 건설사업관리 대가가 검토되었으며, 근로기준법령의 적용으로 인해 발생할 수 있는 문제점이 도출되었다. 이러한 문제점을 토대로 본 연구에서는 건설사업관리 업무가 효율적으로 이루어지기 위해서는 정부에서 건설사업관리 대가를 산출시 관계기관 협의 후 정부차원의 단일 기준을 적용해야 한다는 점, 국토교통부의 건설기술용역대가기준의 적용범위가 명확하게 되어야 한다는 점, 건설사업관리 기술자 투입수량과 함께 기술자의 능력을 고려하여 대가를 산출해야 한다는 점, 근로일수와 근로시간이 결정시 건설특성이 고려되어야 한다는 점을 제시하였다.

Keywords

GGRHC4_2019_v20n2_105_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. CM Fee Ratio on Construction Cost of Total Facilities

GGRHC4_2019_v20n2_105_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. CM Fee Ratio of Construction Cost of Residential Apartment

Table 1. The Ratio of Published Construction Management Service Fee to Fee Ratio based on the Criteria of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

GGRHC4_2019_v20n2_105_t0001.png 이미지

References

  1. Baek, M.C., Park, J.M., Park, G.B., and Kim, O.K. (2014). "A Study on the Method for the Estimate of Construction Management in the Program Management." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 15(5), pp. 3-12. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2014.15.5.003
  2. Baek, M.C., Park, J.M., Park, G.B., and Kim, O.K. (2015). "A study on the method for the Integrated Cost Estimate based on Project (ICEP) of program management with typical model." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 16(1), pp. 119-128. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2015.16.1.119
  3. Choi, E.J., and Choi, S.J. (2018). "Construction Policy Tasks of 52 Hours Worked Per Week." Issue Focus, (Sep. 25. 2018).
  4. Database of Decision against Breach of Labor Standards Act (2012do6537) [Internet]. Seoul (Korea): Supreme Court; 2013 [cited 2018 Aug 25]. Available from:http://glaw.scourt.go.kr.
  5. Database of Publication of Public Procurement Service (2017). [cited 2017 Aug 25]. Available from: http://www.g2b.go.kr.
  6. Kee, J.H., Kim, C.D., and Kim, Y.S. (2000). "Development Of a Project Sensitive Matric Model For CM Fee Calculation." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 1(4), pp. 91-97.
  7. Kim, S.B., Lee, J.D., and Kim, J.W. (2008). "A Benchmarking Study on CM Fee Estimation." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 9(1), pp. 96-106.
  8. Lee, U.K., Yoo, W.S., Kim, D.I,, Kim, T.H., Cha, M.S., and Cho, H.H. (2012). "Improvement of estimating method for construction management service fee by case study." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 13(4), pp. 16-24. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2012.13.4.016
  9. Ministry of Economy and Finance (2017). Detailed Guidelines for Preparing the 2018 Budget Plan and Fund Management Plan (Manual for Business Type and Item).
  10. Ministry of Employment and Labor (2018). Labor Standards Act, Article 50-52.
  11. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Notification No. 414 (2017, Jun 20), Criteria for the Cost of Construction Technology Services.
  12. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2018). Construction Technology Promotion Act, Article 37.
  13. Yoo, B.G., Jung, C.Y., and Kim, J.J. (2006). "Diagnostic Analysis and Influential Factors of CM Fee Estimation." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 7(6), pp. 132-140.