디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권2호
  • /
  • Pages.31-36
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

규제자유특구와 지역특화발전특구에 대한 비교 연구

A Comparative Study on the Regulation-Free Special Zone and the Regional Special Development Zone

  • 최호성 (한국산학연협회 산학연사업팀) ;
  • 김정대 (중소벤처기업부 지역혁신정책과)
  • Choi, Ho-Sung (Division of Korea Association of University, Research Institute and Industry) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Dae (Division of Regional Business Innovation Policy, Ministry of SMEs)
  • 투고 : 2019.01.08
  • 심사 : 2019.02.20
  • 발행 : 2019.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 세계경제는 4차 산업혁명이라는 시대의 흐름에 따라 서로 다른 기술 산업 간 융 복합이 활성화되고 새로운 기술이 빠르게 창출되고 있다. 우리나라도 4차 산업혁명에 대응하고 글로벌 경쟁력을 확보하기 위하여 신기술 신서비스 기반의 혁신기술을 육성하고 있으나, 각종 규제로 인하여 신기술 신서비스에 대한 진입이 어려운 실정이다. 이에 정부는 신기술 신서비스를 활용한 혁신사업이 규제의 제약 없이 실험 실증하고 사업화 할 수 있도록 규제샌드박스(Sandbox)가 적용되는 규제자유특구도입을 추진하고 있다.. 본 연구는 지역특화발전특구와 새로이 도입되는 규제자유특구를 비교 연구함으로써, 전국에 획일적으로 적용되는 규제만을 완화하는 지역특화발전특구의 한계를 고찰하고, 규제자유특구가 신기술 기반의 실증 테스트 베드로 육성할 방향과 지역의 혁신성장 거점으로 성장할 방안을 제시하고자 한다.

New technologies are being created and resulted as new types of fusion complex as the barrier between technology and industries are being broken and convergence is becoming more activated in the global economy of the era of fourth industrial revolution. Korea government is trying to foster innovative technologies for new technologies and new services to prepare for the fourth industrial revolution and gain global competitiveness, but many regulations make it difficult to verify and commercialize them. In response, the Korea government is pushing for the introduction of a regulation-free special zone system in which sandboxes are applied so that new technology and new service-based innovation projects can be freely commercialized through experiment and demonstration. This study aims to examine the limitations of the special zones for regional specialization development applied to the zones that are applied uniformly throughout the country and suggest ways for the deregulation special zone to be fostered as an empirical test bed based on new technologies and as a base for regional innovation.

키워드

Table 1. Designation and revocation of special district for regional development by year

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_31_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Comparison of the Regional Special Development Zone with the Regulation- Free Zone

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_31_t0002.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. J. H. Seo. (2018). The task of settling the regulated sandbox system. Weekly Financial Brief, 27(15), 3-11.
  2. J. B. Kim. (2017). The Necessity and Measures for the Change of Regulation System to Post-regulation Based on Principles. Weekly Financial Brief, 26(15), 11-13.
  3. H. W. Lee. (2017). Regulatory freezones, why the debate and how to understand it. Protocol Research, 52, 239-248.
  4. S. S. Jung. (2017). Technological development and financial regulation : The concept and possibility of Korean law in the right bar 'regulatory sandbox'. BFL, 85, 6-15.
  5. H. O. Choi. (2017). [Regulatory Sandbox] Policy Trends and Implication. Trends and Issues, (33), 1-20.
  6. J. S. Choi. (2018). 4 Measures to rationalize regulations in the era of the Industrial Revolution. FUTURE HORIZON, (35), 18-21.
  7. Y. H. Choi. (2018). Policy Issues for Regulatory Innovation in ICT Sector during the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Focusing on Regulatory Sandboxes. Korea Institute of Policy Planning Seminar, 2018(2), 3-10.
  8. D. S. Kim & J. Y. Jeon. (2016). the legal implications and justification of the regulation free zone. Information Law, 20, 201-227.
  9. J. C. Nam. (2016). Measures to Promote Regional Economy through Regulatory Free Zone National Territory Policy Brief. (591), 1-6.
  10. K. J. Kim. (2018). administrative action law implications according to regulatory redesign. Legal Issues, 38(2), 169-218.
  11. H. Y. Lee. (2009). Regional Special Zone Policy and Regional Development. Homeland, 6-16.
  12. Y. W. Hwang & K. C. Kang. (2006). A Study on the Institutional Complement for the Revitalization of Regional Special Development Zone. Tourism Leisure Research, 18(4), 229-241.
  13. J. H. Jung. (2017). The relationship between regulation and innovation and misunderstanding: centering on the discussion of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Journal of the Korean Institute of Policy Studies, 2017, 45-64.
  14. M. J. Kim. (2016). Name the issue: the industrial ecology that makes regulation relaxed. Urban Affairs, 51(566), 12-13.
  15. B. D. Kim. (2016). Global adoption trends and implications of regulatory safety space. Interstate Financial Brief, 25(29), 10-11.
  16. B. J. Kim. (2017). What will happen to the regulatory prezone in the new administration?. Monthly public policy, 142, 53-55.
  17. S. T. Kim, S. H. Jeon & B. I. Lim. (2018). An Analysis on Macro-economic Effect of Tax Exemption in R&D Special Cluster, Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(6), 409-416. https://doi.org/10.4156/jcit.vol8.issue6.50
  18. D. S. Son, J. S. Lee & Y. B. Kim. (2017). The Effects of Government Support and Regulation on SMEs Technology Innovation, Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(4), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.4.117