The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

In vitro wear behavior between enamel cusp and three aesthetic restorative materials: Zirconia, porcelain, and composite resin

  • Jang, Yong-Seok (Department of Dental Biomaterials, Institute of Oral Bioscience and Institute of Biodegradable Material, BK21 Plus Project, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Nguyen, Thuy-Duong Thi (Odonto-stomatology Faculty, Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University) ;
  • Ko, Young-Han (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Biodegradable Material, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Dae-Woo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Biodegradable Material, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Baik, Byeong Ju (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Biodegradable Material, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Min-Ho (Department of Dental Biomaterials, Institute of Oral Bioscience and Institute of Biodegradable Material, BK21 Plus Project, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Bae, Tae-Sung (Department of Dental Biomaterials, Institute of Oral Bioscience and Institute of Biodegradable Material, BK21 Plus Project, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2018.03.15
  • Accepted : 2019.01.21
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to identify the effects of three aesthetic restorative materials on the wear between tooth and restoration by a pin-on-disk manner. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Six aesthetic restorative materials were used to prepare disk specimens for wear test, which were Lava Zirconia as zirconia group, Vintage MP and Cerabien ZR as veneering porcelain group, Gradia Direct microhybrid composite containing prepolymerized fillers, Filtek Z250 microhybrid composite containing zirconia glass and colloidal silica particles, and Filtek Z350 nanocomposite as composite resin group. Vertical loss of the worn cusp, change of the surface roughness of the restoration materials, and the surface topography were investigated after wear test under 9.8-N contact load. RESULTS. The porcelain groups (Vintage MP and Cerabien ZR) caused the largest vertical loss of teeth when compared with those of the composite resin and zirconia groups, and Filtek Z250 microhybrid composite results in the second-largest vertical loss of teeth. The surface of Filtek Z350 nanocomposite was deeply worn out, but visible wear on the surface of the zirconia and Gradia Direct microhybrid composite was not observed. When the zirconia surface was roughened by sand-blasting, vertical loss of teeth considerably increased when compared with that in the case of fine polished zirconia. CONCLUSION. It was identified that microhybrid composite resin containing a prepolymerized filler and zirconia with reduced surface roughness by polishing were the most desirable restorative materials among the tested materials to prevent the two-body wear between aesthetic restorative material and tooth.

Keywords

References

  1. Lambrechts P, Debels E, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent Mater 2006;22:693-701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.004
  2. Mukatash Nimri EG. Wear mechanisms and wear investigations of dental materials; a review of the literature. Arch Oral Dent Res 2015;2:3.
  3. Smith BG, Bartlett DW, Robb ND. The prevalence, etiology and management of tooth wear in the United Kingdom. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:367-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70043-X
  4. Elmaria A, Goldstein G, Vijayaraghavan T, Legeros RZ, Hittelman EL. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:345-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.09.002
  5. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989; 68:1752-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120601
  6. Lee A, He LH, Lyons K, Swain MV. Tooth wear and wear investigations in dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:217-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02257.x
  7. Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection of allceramic materials. Part II. Zirconia-based dental ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:449-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002
  8. Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:105-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60102-3
  9. Kim MJ, Oh SH, Kim JH, Ju SW, Seo DG, Jun SH, Ahn JS, Ryu JJ. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains. J Dent 2012;40:979-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.004
  10. Preis V, Hahnel S, Kolbeck C, Behrend D, Warkentin M, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of dental materials: A comparison of substructure ceramics, veneering ceramics, and non-precious alloys. Adv Eng Mater 2011;13:B432-B9. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201180015
  11. Kimmich M, Stappert CF. Intraoral treatment of veneering porcelain chipping of fixed dental restorations: a review and clinical application. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144:31-44. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0011
  12. Preis V, Behr M, Kolbeck C, Hahnel S, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains. Dent Mater 2011;27:796-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.04.001
  13. Jandt KD, Sigusch BW. Future perspectives of resin-based dental materials. Dent Mater 2009;25:1001-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.009
  14. Christensen GJ. Remaining challenges with Class II resinbased composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138: 1487-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0085
  15. Hahnel S, Schultz S, Trempler C, Ach B, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Two-body wear of dental restorative materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2011;4:237-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.06.001
  16. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134: 1382-90. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0054
  17. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater 2008;24:433-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.016
  18. Hmaidouch R, Weigl P. Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: a systematic literature review. Int J Oral Sci 2013;5:183-90. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2013.73
  19. Osiewicz MA, Werner A, Pytko-Polonczyk J, Roeters FJ, Kleverlaan CJ. Contact- and contact-free wear between various resin composites. Dent Mater 2015;31:134-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.007
  20. Koottathape N, Takahashi H, Iwasaki N, Kanehira M, Finger WJ. Quantitative wear and wear damage analysis of composite resins in vitro. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;29:508-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.10.003
  21. Cao L, Zhao X, Gong X, Zhao S. An in vitro investigation of wear resistance and hardness of composite resins. Int J Clin Exp Med 2013;6:423-30.
  22. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1141-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.006
  23. DeLong R. Intra-oral restorative materials wear: rethinking the current approaches: how to measure wear. Dent Mater 2006;22:702-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.003
  24. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater 1996;12: 218-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80026-1
  25. Kadokawa A, Suzuki S, Tanaka T. Wear evaluation of porcelain opposing gold, composite resin, and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:258-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.08.016
  26. Harrison A. Wear of combinations of acrylic resin and porcelain, on an abrasion testing machine. J Oral Rehabil 1978;5: 111-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1978.tb01202.x
  27. Zheng J, Zhou ZR, Zhang J, Li H, Yu HY. On the friction and wear behaviour of human tooth enamel and dentin. Wear 2003;255:967-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00079-6
  28. Ekfeldt A, Oilo G. Occlusal contact wear of prosthodontic materials. An in vivo study. Acta Odontol Scand 1988;46:159-69. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358809004762
  29. Mahalick JA, Knap FJ, Weiter EJ. Occlusal wear in prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1971;82:154-9. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1971.0018
  30. Blackham JT, Vandewalle KS, Lien W. Properties of hybrid resin composite systems containing prepolymerized filler particles. Oper Dent 2009;34:697-702. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-118-L
  31. Yesil ZD, Alapati S, Johnston W, Seghi RR. Evaluation of the wear resistance of new nanocomposite resin restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:435-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60105-5
  32. Palaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Nanofilled and microhybrid composite restorations: Five-year clinical wear performances. Dent Mater 2011;27:692-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.012
  33. Ghazal M, Kern M. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:342-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60068-8
  34. Lutz F, Phillips RW, Roulet JF, Setcos JC. In vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites. J Dent Res 1984;63: 914-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630062201
  35. Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, Lloyd CH. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent 1996;24:141-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00043-7
  36. Braem M, Lambrechts P, Van Doren V, Vanherle G. In vivo evaluation of four posterior composites: quantitative wear measurements and clinical behavior. Dent Mater 1986;2:106-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80004-5
  37. Preis V, Schmalzbauer M, Bougeard D, Schneider-Feyrer S, Rosentritt M. Surface properties of monolithic zirconia after dental adjustment treatments and in vitro wear simulation. J Dent 2015;43:133-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.08.011
  38. Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res 1991;70:221-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700031301

Cited by

  1. A State-of-the-Art Review on the Wear of the Occlusal Surfaces of Natural Teeth and Prosthetic Crowns vol.13, pp.16, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163525
  2. Evaluation of Masticatory Muscle Function Using Digital versus Traditional Techniques for Mockup Fabrication: A Controlled Prospective Study vol.10, pp.17, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10176013
  3. The color stability and wear resistance of provisional implant restorations: A prospective clinical study vol.6, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.311
  4. Lingual retainer materials: Comparative evaluation of wear resistance of flowable nanocomposites and universal composite: An in vitro study vol.18, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.324028