Hong Kong's Anti-Ordinance Amendment Movement and the Trend of Change in the One Country-Two System

香港反修例运动与"一国两制"演变趋势

  • Received : 2019.08.30
  • Accepted : 2019.09.25
  • Published : 2019.09.30

Abstract

The Hong Kong's Anti-Ordinance Amendment Movement is the most serious radical social movement since the 1997 return, which has served as the promotion of the 2014 Occupy Central Movement and broken through the violence baseline. The movement came from a criminal case committed in Taiwan,which gave a good reason and motivation for the HK government to amend the Fugitive Offenders Ordinance. The HK government has responded to the protests by strictly limiting the legal scope and transfer procedure, even giving up the legislative motion. But the protests still say no and develop into the constantly violent activities. Many of the protests have committed the crimes in HK laws,part of whom have been arrested,prosecuted and under judicially judged. It is necessary for the offenders to be punished to protect the authority of rule of law in HK. Two different paths for HK have fought against each other since the 1997 return: one is the "democratic-welfare" path taken by the Pan-Democratic Camp, the other is the "Legal-development" path taken by the Pan-Establishment Camp. The second path shares some nuclear characteristics of the so-called The China Model mainly shaped from the 40-years Reforms and Openness. However, the HK people can't understand the China Model very well and show great fear and distrust on the judicial system of Mainland China. The foreign powers such as US and UK have illegally interfered the HK issues which are deemed to be the domestic affairs of China. The so-called Sino-UK Joint Declaration can't serve as the legal basis for the interference. Taiwan, as a part of China, also plays a negative role in this movement for its electoral and political interest. Up to now, the movement has gone down and the HK government has the legal capacity to solve the problems under the supports from the central government and the HK people. The HK people love its rule of law and order under the constitutional framework of One Country Two System. After the movement,One Country Two Systems will be go on, and the integrated development under the policies of the central government will be the main stream. However, the relevant problems exposed by this movement muse be checked and solved legally and strictly,especially concerning the social inequality and youth development.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

本文受中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助,项目名称"全面依法治国的宪法内涵与制度展开研究"(项目编号 : YWF-19-BJ-W-44)。

References

  1. 马英九,萧旭岑.(2018).八年执政回忆录.远见天下文化出版有限公司.台北.
  2. 邓小平. (1993).邓小平文选(第三卷).人民出版社.北京.
  3. 汉密尔顿,杰伊,麦迪逊. (1980). 联邦党人文集. 程逢如等译. 商务印书馆. 北京.
  4. 余非. (2015). "占中"透视. 三联书店. 香港.
  5. 罗桑瓦龙. (2005). 公民的加冕礼:法国普选史. 吕一民译. 上海人民出版社. 上海.
  6. 郑永年. (2010). 中国模式:经验与困局. 浙江人民出版社. 杭州.
  7. 丁学良. (2011). 辩论中国模式. 社会科学文献出版社. 北京.
  8. 陈冠中. (2013). 我们这一代香港人. 中信出版社. 北京.
  9. 陈端洪. (2016). 理解香港政治. 中外法学, 5.
  10. 田飞龙. (2019). 反修例运动与两制融合难题. 中国评论, 8.
  11. 田飞龙. (2018). 依法治港和有序融合. 学术界, 7.
  12. 田飞龙. (2017). 香港基本法与国家建构-回归二十年的实践回顾与理论反思. 学海, 4.
  13. 叶荫聪. (2017). 争斗式民主与公共文化:关于香港政治的观察. 二十一世纪, 2.
  14. 吕大乐. (2017). 尴尬的香港,仍在准备中. 二十一世纪, 8.
  15. 郑戈. (2017). "一国两制"与国家整合. 二十一世纪, 8.
  16. 王禹.(2016). "一国两制"下中央对特别行政区的全面管治权. 港澳研究, 2.
  17. 林来梵, 黎沛文. (2015). 防卫型民主理念下香港政党行为的规范. 法学, 4.
  18. 李环. (2018). 近年来英国对香港政策评析. 国际研究参考, 11.
  19. 伍俐斌. (2017). 从条约必须信守原则分析 《中英联合声明》 的履行. 南京大学法律评论, 1.
  20. 李义虎. (2014). 作为新命题的"一国两制"台湾模式. 国际政治研究, 4.