Analyses & Alternatives (분석과 대안)

Korea Consensus Institute(KCI) (사단법인 코리아컨센서스연구원)
권호 표지

Ditching the Party: Disaggregating Split Ticket Voting in Taiwan's 2016 Legislative Election

  • Rich, Timothy S. (Western Kentucky University)
  • Received : 2019.01.02
  • Accepted : 2019.02.19
  • Published : 2019.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

What motivates split-ticket voting in mixed electoral systems, where voters choose one party in district races and another party on the party list ballot? While much of the literature assumes strategic intent, three aspects commonly are overlooked: the competitiveness of district races, the presence of a district candidate from one's preferred party, and whether voters know the electoral threshold for party list seats. Furthermore, few studies disaggregate types of split-ticket voting (e.g. not voting for one's preferred party in a district vs. party list). Taiwan provides an intriguing case study for analysis, not only as a relatively new adopter of a mixed system, but also the presence of additional conditions that would encourage at least the consideration of a split ticket. Using survey data from the Taiwan's Election and Democratization Studies (TEDS) after the Taiwan's 2016 Legislative Yuan election, this analysis finds that knowing the threshold, the winner's margin, and the placement of a district candidate from one's preferred party all influence split-ticket voting among those with a partisan preference. However, closer inspection identifies a distinction between defecting from the district versus the party list. Evidence shows that district competitiveness and candidate placement influences defection from the district candidate, while the electoral threshold influences defection from the party list. The results add to our understanding of strategic and non-strategic incentives in mixed systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Alvarez, R. M. & Nagler, J. (2000). A new approach to modelling strategic voting in multiparty elections. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 57-75.
  2. Banducci, S., Karp, J., Vowles, J. & Donovan, T. (1999). Strategic voting in the 1996 New Zealand election: implications for a new mixed system. Working Paper, University of Waikato.
  3. Bawn, K. (1999). Voter responses to electoral complexity: ticket splitting, rational voters, and representation in the Federal Republic of Germany. British Journal of Political Science, 29, 487-505.
  4. Bean, C. S. & Wattenberg, M. P. (1998). Attitudes toward divided government and ticket-splitting in Australia and the United States. Australian Journal of Political Science, 33(1), 25-36.
  5. Benoit, K., Giannetti, D. & Laver, M. (2006). Voter strategies with restricted choice menus. British Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 459-485.
  6. Burden, B. C. (2009). Candidate-driven ticket splitting in the 2000 Japanese elections. Electoral Studies, 28(1), 33-40.
  7. Campbell, A. & Miller, W. E. (1957). The motivational basis of straight and split ticket voting. American Political Science Review, 51(2), 293-312.
  8. Cox, G. W. (1997). Making votes count: strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties: their organization and activity in the modern state. London: Methuen & Company.
  10. Ferrara, F. Herron, E. S., & Nishikawa, M. (2005). Mixed electoral systems: combination and its consequences. New York: Palgrave.
  11. Fiorina, M. P. (1992). Divided government. New York: Macmillan.
  12. Gschwend, T. (2007). Ticket splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules: evidence from Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 1-23.
  13. Gschwend, T. & van der Kolk. H. (2006). Split ticket voting in mixed member proportional systems: the hypothetical case of the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 41(2), 163-179.
  14. Han, S. I. (2013). Strategic voting of small parties supporters in two-vote mixed-member majoritarian system. Korean Political Science Review, 5(12), 235-254.
  15. Helmke, G. (2009). Ticket splitting as electoral insurance: the Mexico 2000 Elections. Electoral Studies, 28(1), 70-78.
  16. Herron, E. S. & Nishikwa, M. (2001). Contamination effects and the number of parties in mixed superposition electoral systems. Electoral Studies, 20(1), 63-86.
  17. Jacobson, G. (1992). The politics of congressional elections. New York: Harper Collins.
  18. Karp, J. A. (2006). Political knowledge about electoral rules: comparing mixed member proportional systems in Germany and New Zealand. Electoral Studies, 25(4), 714-730.
  19. Karp, J. A., Vowles, J. Banducci, S. & Donovan, T. (2002). Strategic voting, party activity and candidate effects: testing explanations for split voting in New Zealand's new mixed system. Electoral Studies, 12, 1-22.
  20. King, G. (1997). A solution to the ecological inference problem: reconstructing individual behavior from aggregate data. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  21. Kohno, M. (1997). Voter turnout and strategic ticket-splitting under Japan's new electoral rules. Asian Survey, 37(5), 429-440.
  22. Ladd, E. C. (1990). Public opinion and the "Congress problem". The Public Interest, 100, 57-67.
  23. Lancaster, T. D. & Patterson, W. D. (1990). Comparative pork barrel politics: perceptions from the West German Bundestag. Comparative Political Studies, 22(4), 458-477.
  24. Lee, H. (2004). Political effect of introduction of party bloc vote. Paper presented at the Special Conference on the 17th National Assembly Election of the Korean Political Science Association.
  25. Lewis-Beck, M. & Nadeau, R. (2004). Split-ticket voting: the effects of cognitive Madisonianism. Journal of Politics, 66(1), 97-112.
  26. Marsh, M. & Plescia, C. (2016). Split-ticket voting in an STV system: choice in a non-strategic context. Irish Political Studies, 31(2), 163-181.
  27. Moser, R. G. & Scheiner, E. (2005). Strategic ticket splitting and the personal vote in mixed-member electoral systems. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30, 259-276.
  28. Moser, R. G. & Scheiner, E. (2009). Strategic voting in established and new democracies: ticket splitting in mixed-member electoral systems. Electoral Studies, 28(1), 51-61.
  29. Park, C. W. & Ryu, J. (2009). Patterns of split-ticket voting in the 2008 Korean general election for the National Assembly. Presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association. New Orleans, LA. January 9.
  30. Plescia, C. (2016). Split-ticket voting in mixed-member electoral systems. Colchester: ECPR Press.
  31. Rallings, C. & Thrasher, M. (2003). Explaining split-ticket voting at the 1979 and 1997 general and local elections in England. Political Studies, 51(3), 558-572.
  32. Rich, T. S. (2012). The timing of split-ticket voting decisions in mixed systems: evidence from South Korea. Asian Journal of Political Science, 20(2), 203-220.
  33. Rich, T. S. (2014). Understanding the rules of the game: evidence from Taiwan's mixed legislative system. Asian Politics & Policy, 6(1), 45-58.
  34. Wang, T. Y. & Cheng, S. F. (2015). Presidential approval in Taiwan: an analysis of survey data in the Ma Ying-jeou presidency. Electoral Studies, 40, 34-44.
  35. Wright, G. C. (1993). Errors in measuring vote choice in the National Election Studies, 1952-88. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 291-316.