Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Interest of Activity and Learning Contents in SW Education Using Robot: Focused on Hamster Robot

로봇 활용 SW 교육에서 활동 및 학습 내용에 따른 학습자 흥미: 햄스터 로봇을 중심으로

  • 노지예 (고려대학교 대학정책연구원) ;
  • 박광현 (광운대학교 로봇학부)
  • Received : 2019.01.31
  • Accepted : 2019.02.27
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, we investigated the learners' interest of activity and learning contents in elementary school SW education using robot. In order to achieve the purpose of this paper, SW education using Entry and Hamster robot was conducted to 15 students who was participated in educational program in Youth training center. In addition, we examined mean difference using descriptive statistics. Our results show that students were generally interested in activities related to hamster robots. Further, interest was associated with gender. Specifically, boys were more interested in activities related to axis acceleration sensor and light sensor and girls were more interested in activities related to sound and movement. This paper was investigated students' interest and identify differences depending on gender, and supposed the concrete data that can be used in the school field.

본 연구에서는 초등학교 로봇 활용 SW 교육에서 진행되는 활동 및 학습 내용에 따른 학습자의 흥미를 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위해 서울 소재의 A 청소년수련관에서 실시하는 로봇 활용 SW 교육에 참여한 초등학생 15명을 대상으로 엔트리와 햄스터 로봇을 활용하여 4주간 수업을 진행하고 기술통계분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 학생들은 햄스터 로봇과 관련된 활동들을 전반적으로 흥미롭게 여기는 것으로 나타났다. 구체적으로, 남학생들은 가속도 센서, 밝기 센서와 관련된 활동의 흥미가 높고, 여학생은 소리, 움직임과 관련된 활동의 흥미가 높은 것으로 나타나 성별의 차이가 관찰되었다. 본 연구는 활동 및 학습 내용에 따른 학생들의 흥미를 알아보고, 성별의 차이를 분석하여, 학교 현장에서 활용할 수 있는 구체적인 자료를 제공하였다는 데 연구의 의의를 찾을 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, S. A. (2014). Effect of Technology Contents-Based Robot Education Program on Attitude toward Technology of Elementary School Students. The Journal of Education, 34(1), 183-203.
  2. Carter, J., & Jenkins, T. (1999). Gender and programming. SIGCSE Bull, 31(3), 1-4. doi:10.1145/384267.305824
  3. Durak, H. Y., & Saritepeci, M. (2018). Analysis of the relation between computational thinking skills and various variables with the structural equation model. Computers & Education, 116, 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.09.004
  4. Ginsburg, H. P., & Opper, S. (1988). Piaget's theory of intellectual development. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  5. Ham, S. J., Yu, H. J., Jin, H. N., Kwon, J. H., Nam, T. M., Park, W. Y., Kim, S. H., Lee, S. H., Jamf, S. Y., Lee, H. M., Nam, Y. H., & Moon, I. J (2016). Coding Monster. Association of Teachers for Computing.
  6. Jeon, S. J., Jeon, Y. J., Kim, S. K., Kim, D. Y., & Jeong, I. K. (2018). Elementary School Students' Level of Computational Thinking through Bebras Challenge 2017. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 22(3), 345-356. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.3.345
  7. Jeong, I. K. (2017). Study on the Preliminary Teachers' Perception for the Development of Curriculum of the Robot-based Software Education in the Universities of Education. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 21(3), 277-284. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.21.3.277
  8. Kim, C. (2014). A Study on Contents of Robot Education Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 18(3), 443-452. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.3.443
  9. Kim, J. S., Han, S. G., Kim, S. H., Jung, S. W., Yang, J. M., Jang, E. D., & Kim, J. N. (2015). A Study on Development of SW Education Teaching and Learning Model. KEDI, CR 2015-35.
  10. Kim, K. H. (2015). An Analysis of Teachers' Perception and the Status of Robot Based Education. The Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1926.10879624
  11. Kim, K. M., & Kim, H. J. (2017). A Study on Customized Software Education method using Flipped Learning in the Digital Age. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(7), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.3.55
  12. Kim, T. H., & Kim, J. H. (2013). The Effect of Kodu Programming Learning on Logical Thinking and Learning Interest of Elementary Students. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 16(3), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2013.16.3.002
  13. Lawhead, P. B., Duncan, M. E., Bland, C. G., Goldweber, M., Schep, M., Barnes, D. J., & Hollingsworth, R. G. (2002). A road map for teaching introductory programming using LEGO mindstorms robots. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 35(2). 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1145/782941.783002
  14. Lee, J. M., Park, H. K., & Choi, H. S. (2018). Effects of SW Education Using Robots on Computational Thinking, Creativity, Academic Interest and Collaborative Skill. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 22(1), 9-21 https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.1.9
  15. Lee, Y. H., & Moon, W. S. (2018). Development of Physical Computing Education Program for Lower Grades in Elementary School - PACS program based on turtle robot. Proceedings of the Korean Association of Information Education, 9(1), 1-9.
  16. Ministry of education, KERIS(2015). Software training operation guidelines. Seoul: Ministry of education.
  17. Moon, K. H., & Kim, H. P. (2015). The Effects of Robot Education Program Applied with Storytelling on Elementary School Students Creativities and Interests about Robots. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education. 21(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.17055/JPAER.2015.21.1.1
  18. Moon, S. H., Baek, H. S., & Cho, H. K. (2011). The Effect of a Practical Arts Education using UCR(User-Created-Robot) Electronic Kit on Children's Understanding and Interests in Electronic Class. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 24(1), 195-212.
  19. Non, J. Y., & Lee, J. M. (2018). Design of a SW Educational Program Using Robots: Focused on Computational Thinking and Creative Problem Solving Abilities of Elementary School Students. Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.34.1.001
  20. Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
  21. Rusk, N., Resnick, M., Berg, R., & Pezalla-Granlund M. (2008). New pathways into robotics: strategies for broadening participation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9082-2
  22. Shim, J. K., Kim, H. C., Lee, W. K. (2016). A Study on Gender Differences in Programming Attitude and Achievements on Physical Computing Education in Informatics Curriculum Revised 2015. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 19(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2016.19.4.001
  23. Shin, S. B. (2016). Application Effectiveness of the Discussion Learning in the Programming Education. Journal of Korea Entertainment Industry Association, 10(5), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.21184/jkeia.2016.10.10.5.123
  24. Yoo, H. S., & Lee, C. H. (2015). Effect of STEAM Education using Robot for Learning Underachievers on Interest toward Science and Self-efficacy. The Journal of Practical Arts Education Research. 21(1), 17-33.
  25. Yoo, I. H. (2014). Design a Programming Education Plan for SW Education Using Robot and Mobile Application Development Tool. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 18(4). 615-624. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.4.615

Cited by

  1. 관심중심수용모형(CBAM)을 활용한 초등교사의 SW교육 관심도 및 실행수준 분석 vol.20, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2020.20.08.075
  2. 로봇 활용 SW융합교육에서 SW효능감이 컴퓨팅 사고력, 융합인재소양에 미치는 영향: 흥미와 학습참여의 이중매개효과 vol.20, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5392/jkca.2020.20.11.001