DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Renewable Energy in Agricultural Sector

농업분야 신재생에너지 보급현황 및 파급효과 분석

  • Park, Jiyun (Korea Rural Economic Institute, Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry Policy Research) ;
  • Kim, Yeonjoong (Korea Rural Economic Institute, Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry Policy Research)
  • 박지연 (한국농촌경제연구원 농림산업정책연구본부) ;
  • 김연중 (한국농촌경제연구원 농림산업정책연구본부)
  • Received : 2018.09.21
  • Accepted : 2019.01.04
  • Published : 2019.01.31

Abstract

The increase in the amount of energy used in the agricultural sector due to the expansion of agricultural machinery and greenhouse horticulture has caused a range of problems, such as an increase in the cost of input, such as heating costs and greenhouse gas emission. To overcome these problems, this study examined the current status of energy use in greenhouse horticulture as well as the change patterns of non-taxable oil and agricultural electricity, and reviewed the current status of the supply of renewable energy and energy saving facilities for agriculture. This study investigated the area of advanced and renewable energy and energy saving facilities implemented, applied the energy saving ratio of advanced and renewable energy and energy saving facilities, and determined the effects of renewable energy in the agricultural sector, such as increase in production, decrease in heating cost, reduction in Government financial expenditure, reduction in greenhouse gas emission, and oil substitution effect.

농기계와 시설원예 보급 확대 등으로 인하여 농업부문 에너지 이용량이 증가함에 따라 난방비 등 투입비용의 증가 및 온실가스 배출 등 여러 가지 문제점이 발생하고 있다. 이러한 문제점을 개선하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 시설원예 농업부문 에너지 이용실태를 개략적으로 살펴보고, 면세유, 농사용 전기의 변화 형태를 살펴보았으며, 농업용 신재생에너지 및 에너지 절감시설의 보급현황을 검토하였다. 마지막으로 신재생에너지 및 에너지 절감시설의 보급면적을 조사하고, 신재생에너지와 에너지 절감시설의 에너지 절감비율을 적용하여, 농업부문 신재생에너지 및 에너지 절감시설 보급에 따른 난방비 절감효과, 생산성 증대효과, 정부재정지출절감효과, 온실가스 절감효과, 그리고 석유류 대체효과를 살펴보았다. 주요 분석결과(파프리카)는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 단위면적당 재정지출 절감효과는 열회수환기장치가 300,863원/10a으로 가장 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 국제유가가 상승할수록 신재생에너지 및 에너지 절감시설 보급에 따른 재정지출 절감효과도 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 온실가스 감축에 따른 경제적 총 편익을 계산한 결과 다겹보온커튼이 608.1억 원으로 가장 높게 나타났다. 셋째, 농업부문 신재생에너지 및 에너지 절감시설의 보급은 경유 등 에너지 투입비용을 감소시킴으로써 경영비 절감효과를 가져오는데 열회수환기장치는 3,593천 원/10a의 난방비 등 경영비 절감 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 농업부문 신재생에너지 및 에너지 절감시설은 투입비용 절감효과뿐만 아니라 생산성 증대효과도 있다. 지열히트펌프의 경우 9,539kg/10a의 파프리타 생산량 증대효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 다섯째, 농업부문 신재생에너지 및 에너지 절감시설의 보급은 경유 등 석유류 투입을 대체하는 효과가 있으며 열회수환기장치는 1,806리터/10a의 석유류 대체효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

Table 1. Agricultural energy use efficiency project fund

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Distribution of Renewable Energy in Agricultural Sector

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Distribution of Energy Saving Facilities in Ag. Sector

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Reduction of financial expenditure of paprika by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Reduction of financial expenditure of paprika by oil price scenario

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Reduction of financial expenditure of tomato by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Reduction of financial expenditure of tomato by oil price scenario

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Carbon emission factors by energy sources

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) emission from paprika by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Reduction of greenhouse gases (GHG) emission from tomato by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0010.png 이미지

Table 11. Reduction of heating costs of paprika by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0011.png 이미지

Table 12. Reduction of heating costs of paprika by oil price scenario

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0012.png 이미지

Table 13. Reduction of heating costs of tomato by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0013.png 이미지

Table 14. Reduction of heating costs of tomato by oil price scenario

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0014.png 이미지

Table 15. Increase in quantity produced of paprika by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0015.png 이미지

Table 16. Increase in production of paprika by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0016.png 이미지

Table 17. Increase in quantity produced of tomato by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0017.png 이미지

Table 18. Increase in production of tomato by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0018.png 이미지

Table 19. Oil replacement effects of paprika by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0019.png 이미지

Table 20. Oil replacement effects of tomato by introduction of renewable energy and energy saving facilities

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n1_224_t0020.png 이미지

References

  1. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center, 2017 National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report of Korea, GIR, 2017.
  2. Ministry of Environment, Press release "2030 Amendment to the GHG Reduction Roadmap and the Plan for Allocation of Emissions from 2018 to 2020", ME, 2018. 07. 24.
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Renewable Energy 3020 Implementation Plan, MOTIE, 2017.
  4. Y. J. Kim, J. J. Kim, H. S. Han, The Current Status of Agricultural Energy Production and Consumption, KREI, 2013.
  5. Y. J. Kim et al., Analysis of Management Status of Horticultural Crops by Heating and Cooling System, KREI, 2014.
  6. Korea Energy Economics Institute, 2017 Energy Statistics, KEEI, 2017.
  7. S. W. Kang et al., "Analysis of Energy Consumption in Agricultural Facilities", The Korean Society for New and Renewable Energy Conference Proceedings, p. 293, March, 2017.
  8. S. H. Lee, J. H. Park, "Investigating Multi-attributes for Expanding New Renewable Energy in Agricultural Sector: Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process", CNU Journal of Agricultural Science, Vol.38, No.1, pp. 183-190, March, 2011.
  9. S. C. Park, "Prospects and Tasks of New and Renewable Energy Development", Journal of Biosystems Eng., Vol.31, No.3, pp. 292-303, 2006.
  10. Y. J. Kim, H. S. Han, C. K. Choi, "Study on Controlled Horticulture Farmers' Attitude of Energy-Saving Facilities using the IPA method", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, Vol.15, No.10, pp. 6114-6125, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.10.6114
  11. K. C. Kang, "Performance Test of Hot Air Heater Exhaust Gas Heat Recovery System Using Heat Pipe", Kor. Res. Soc. Pretected Hort., Vol.13, No.2, pp. 57-66, 2000.
  12. J. K. Kwon et al., "Performance Improvement of an Air Source Heat Pump by Storage of Surplus Solar Energy in Greenhouse", Protected Horticulture and Plant Factory, Vol.22, No.4, pp. 328-334, December, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2013.22.4.328
  13. T. S. Lee et al., "Analysis of Temperature and Humidity Distributions according to Arrangements of Air Circulation Fans in Single-span Tomato Greenhouse", Protected Horticulture and Plant Factory, Vol.25, No.4, pp. 277-282, December, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2016.25.4.277
  14. T. S. Lee et al., "Analysis of Air Temperature and Humidity Distributions and Energy Consumptions according to Use of Air Circulation Fans in a Single-span Greenhouse",, Protected Horticulture and Plant Factory, Vol.26, No.4, pp. 276-282, October, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2017.26.4.276
  15. Y. H. Kim et al., "Performance of the Heat Pump with a Air-Water Direct Contact Heat Exchanger for Greenhouse Heating", New & Renewable Energy, Vol.13, No.3, pp. 58-64, September, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7849/ksnre.2017.9.13.3.058
  16. Y. J. Kim, H. S. Han, C. K. Choi, "A Study on Economic Analysis of New Renewable Energy and Effects of Ground Source Heat Pump in Paprika Farms". Korean Society for Agricultural Machinery Conference Proceedings, Vol.18, No.2, pp. 193-194, 2013.
  17. Y. K. Kang et al., "The Agricultural Use Case of Thermoelectric Power Plant Hot Waste Wate and Policy Trends", The Korean Society for New and Renewable Energy Conference Proceedings, p. 80, Spring, 2015.
  18. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, MAFRA Implementation Guide, MAFRA. 2018.
  19. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Status of Greenhouse of Vegetable and Production of Vegetable, MAFRA, each year.
  20. Y. J. Kim, S. M. Lee, B. S. Kim, Revitalization of New and Renewable Energy in Agriculture Sector, KREI, 2010.