Fig. 1. Battery type performance comparing[1].
Fig. 2. Simplified equivalent circuit model.
Fig. 3. OCV measurement method.
Fig. 5. IR drop curve.
Fig. 9. Capacity test profile
Fig. 13. Matlab curve fitting at rest period.
TABLE I BATTERY PARAMETER
Fig. 15. Capacity/votage curve.
Fig. 16. SOC/OCV curve.
Fig. 17. Battery pack internal cell OCV unbalance.
Fig. 19. Single cell parameter simulation.
Fig. 20. Battery pack parameter simulation.
Fig. 21. Single cell parameter simulation error.
Fig. 24. Cycling test according to DOD[5].
Fig. 4. SOC-OCV relationship.
Fig. 6. Charge transfer curve.
Fig. 7. Single cell experiment equipment.
Fig. 8. Battery pack experiment equipment.
Fig. 10. Simplified equivalent circuit model.
Fig. 11. 18650 29E battery equivalent circuit model.
Fig. 12. Internal parameter estimation method.
Fig. 14. Battery parameter verification.
Fig. 18. SOC/DCIR curve.
Fig. 22. Battery pack parameter simulation error.
Fig. 23. Single cell and battery pack SOC estimation.
References
- J. C. Koo, “Space technology geostationary satellite battery trend,” The Transactions of the KIEE, Vol. 4, No. 5, pp. 18-26, May 2008.
- A. Rahmoun, "Modelling of li-ion batteries using equivalent circuit diagrams," Przeglad Elektotechniczny (Electrical Review), R. 88 NR 7b/2012, pp. 152-156, 2012.
- H. He, R. Xiong, and J. Fan, "Evaluation of lithium-ion battery equivalent circuit models for state of charge estimation by an experimental approach," Vol. 4, Energies 2011, pp. 582-598, Mar. 2011.
- F. K. Abo-Elyousr, F. N. Abd-Elbar, H. A. Abo-Zaid, and G. H. Rim, “Accurate modeling of primatic type high current lithium-iron-phosophate(LiFePO4) Battery for automotive applications,” Energy and Power Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 465-481, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4236/epe.2012.46061
- T. Max, "ABSL's Cost Li-Ion Cell Suite Development," in 2007 NASA Battery Workshop, 2007.