DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Automatic Ship Collision Avoidance Algorithm based on Probabilistic Velocity Obstacle with Consideration of COLREGs

국제해상충돌예방규칙을 고려한 확률적 속도 장애물 기반의 선박 충돌회피 알고리즘

  • Received : 2018.08.14
  • Accepted : 2018.11.11
  • Published : 2019.02.20

Abstract

This study presents an automatic collision avoidance algorithm for autonomous navigation of unmanned surface vessels. The performance of the collision avoidance algorithm is heavily dependent on the estimation quality of the course and speed of traffic ships because collision avoidance maneuvers should be determined based on the predicted motions of the traffic ships and their trajectory uncertainties. In this study, the collision avoidance algorithm is implemented based on the Probabilistic Velocity Obstacle (PVO) approach considering the maritime collision regulations (COLREGs). In order to demonstrate the performance of the proposed algorithm, an extensive set of simulations was conducted and the results are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Campbell, S., Naeem, W., & Irwin, G. W., 2012. A review on improving the autonomy of unmanned surface vehicles through intelligent collision avoidance manoeuvres. Annual Reviews in Control, 36(2), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2012.09.008
  2. Cho, Y., & Kim, J., 2017. Collision probability assessment between surface ships considering maneuver intentions. In OCEANS 2017-Aberdeen, (pp. 1-5).
  3. Cho, Y., Han, J., Kim, J., & Lee, P., 2018. Collision probability assessment between surface ships in velocity coordinates. The Korean Association of Ocean Science and Technology Societies, Jeju, Republic of Korea, 24-25 May 2018.
  4. Degre, T., & Lefevre, X., 1981. A collision avoidance system. The Journal of Navigation, 34(2), 294-302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300021408
  5. Fiorini, P., & Shiller, Z., 1998. Motion planning in dynamic environments using velocity obstacles. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 17(7), 760-772. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836499801700706
  6. Genz, A., & Bretz, F., 2009. Computation of multivariate normal and t probabilities (Vol. 195). Springer Science & Business Media.
  7. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 1972. COLREGs-Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, London, U.K.
  8. Kluge, B., & Prassler, E., 2003. Recursive probabilistic velocity obstacles for reflective navigation. In Field and Service Robotics, (pp. 71-79). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  9. Kuwata, Y., Wolf, M. T., Zarzhitsky, D., & Huntsberger, T. L., 2014. Safe maritime autonomous navigation with COLREGS, using velocity obstacles. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 39(1), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2013.2254214
  10. Koenig, N., & Howard, A., 2004. Design and use paradigms for gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), volume 3. IEEE, pp. 2149-2154.
  11. Lee, S. M., Kwon, K. Y., & Joh, J., 2004. A fuzzy logic for autonomous navigation of marine vehicles satisfying COLREG guidelines. International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, 2(2), 171-181.
  12. Mitrofanov, O., 1968. An anti-collision indicator. The Journal of Navigation, 21(2), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463300030319
  13. Naeem, W., Irwin, G. W., & Yang, A., 2012. COLREGs-based collision avoidance strategies for unmanned surface vehicles. Mechatronics, 22(6), 669-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2011.09.012
  14. Park, J., & Kim, J., 2017. Predictive evaluation of ship collision risk using the concept of probability flow. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 42(4), 836-845. https://doi.org/10.1109/JOE.2016.2614870
  15. Park, J., Han, J., Kim, J., & Son, N. S., 2016. Probabilistic quantification of ship collision risk considering trajectory uncertainties. 10th IFAC Conference on Control Applications in Marine Systems (CAMS), 49(23), 109-114.
  16. Park, J. et al., 2017. Development of an Unmanned Surface Vehicle System for the 2014 Maritime RobotX Challenge. Journal of Field Robotics, 34(4), 644-665. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21659