Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Case Study of the Australian Research Data Policy and Support Services

호주의 연구데이터 정책 및 지원체계에 대한 사례 분석

  • 심원식 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2019.11.17
  • Accepted : 2019.12.17
  • Published : 2019.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In early 2019, Korea passed the law that introduced data management plan policy similar to those adopted by national funding agencies in other countries. In anticipation of developing research data infrastructure and support services, this study analyzed Australia's relevant policies and policy instruments. A number of face-to-face interviews with the experts at the national funding agency, a national research data agency and a number of research libraries, along with focused literature analysis. In Australia, the 2015 Public Data Policy is applied to research data from publicly funded research. Research data management and sharing is recommended but not required by the national funding agency it its policy documents. Australian National Data Service(ANDS), Australia's national research data agency, is an important component of the national research infrastructure. ANDS plays a wide range of roles including research data platform development, education and training, policy support, and funding agency for small-scale R&D. Some of the Australian research libraries have developed in-house systems for research data storage and publishing. However, there is no significant demand for research data service as yet. Lessons learned include the following: ensuring transparency and predictability of research data policies, establishing a dedicated agency responsible for research data platform development and training, and cultivating data capabilities at research libraries.

최근 우리나라에서도 관련 법개정을 통해 해외 국가의 연구비 지원기관 등에서 시행하고 있는 데이터관리계획 정책이 도입되었다. 본 연구는 앞으로 연구데이터의 공유 및 재사용을 지원할 수 있는 인프라와 지원 서비스를 개발함에 있어 참고가 될 수 있는 호주의 사례를 분석하여 시사점을 도출하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 호주의 연구비 지원기관, 연구데이터 전담기관, 대학도서관의 다양한 전문가와의 면담을 시행하고 관련 문헌을 조사하였다. 호주의 경우 연방 차원에서 2015년 제정된 Public Data Policy에 연구데이터를 공공데이터 범위에 포함시키고, 연구비 지원기관의 정책 가이드라인에 연구데이터의 체계적인 관리와 공유를 권장하고 있지만 의무규정은 아니다. 연구데이터 전담기관인 Australian National Data Service(ANDS)는 국가의 연구인프라 구축의 중요한 부분이며 연구데이터 인프라의 구축, 교육, 정책 지원, 소규모 연구개발사업 지원 등의 다양한 역할을 수행하고 있다. 호주 대학도서관은 연구데이터 관련 일부 자체 시스템을 제공하고 있으나 아직까지는 연구데이터와 관련된 주요한 수요는 없는 것으로 보인다. 호주 사례의 시사점으로는 연구데이터 관련 정책 수립에 있어서 높은 투명성과 예측가능성, 연구데이터 전담 기관 설립을 통한 전문적 인프라 구축 및 교육/홍보 기능 수행, 대학도서관의 데이터 역량 개발을 들 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT (2019). 2019 Comprehensive implementation plan for R&D program in science, technology and ICT.
  2. Ministry of Science and ICT (2018). A study for the establishment of science and technology research data sharing foundation. Report no. 2018-2-10. Conducted by the Science & Technology Policy Institute.
  3. Kim, G. (2015). Comparative review of oversea's science data management related laws. Science, Technology and Law, 6(1), 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2326-1951.1966.tb02435.x
  4. Kim, M., & Kim, S. (2015). A study on the factors affecting sharing of research data of science and technology researchers. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 49(2), 313-334. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2015.49.2.313
  5. Kim, S., & Oh, S. G. (2018). Key factors in the implementation of research data management services. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(2), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.2.141
  6. Kim, S. J., & Chung, E. (2012). Toward research records management in government-funded research institutes. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 23(4), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2012.23.4.109
  7. Kim, J. (2013). An analysis of data management policies of government funding agencies in the U.S., the U.K., Canada and Australia. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(3), 251-274. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2013.47.3.251
  8. Kim, J. (2014). A study of research data management services of research university libraries in the U.S. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 25(3), 165-189. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2014.25.3.165
  9. Kim, J. (2016). A study on policy components of data access and use controls in research data repositories. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(3), 213-239. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.3.201609.213
  10. Kim, J. (2018). A content analysis of research data management training programs at the university libraries in North Korea: Focusing on data literacy competencies. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(4), 7-36. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.4.007
  11. Noh, Y., Oh, E., & Jeong, D-K. (2018). A study on the proposal of direction of data linkage for building a one-stop portal service for humanities assets. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(2), 7-36. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.2.007
  12. Park, M., Ahn, I., & Kim, J. (2018). A study on use case of research data sharing in biotechnology. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 29(1), 393-416. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2018.29.1.393
  13. Park, M., Ahn, I., & Nam, S. (2018). A study on the analysis of research data management and sharing of science & technology government-funded research institutes. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 29(4), 319-344. https://doi.org/10.14699/KBIBLIA.2018.29.4.319
  14. Shin, E. J. et al. (2017). Policy measures to promote open science in South Korea. Policy Research 2017-08. Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  15. Shim, W. (2015). Developing a roadmap for national research data management governance: Based on the analysis of United Kingdom's case. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(4), 355-378. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2015.49.4.355
  16. Shim, W. (2016). A case study of U.S. academic libraries' research data support services. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4), 311-332. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.311
  17. Shim, Y., & Kim, J. (2019). A study on the development of research data management service in a domestic university library: Focused on the analysis on the needs of researchers affiliated in Seoul National University. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 36(3), 61-80.
  18. Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2013). Legislation cases, management policies and countermeasures on scientific data - Focusing Australia, the United States and China. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 16(1), 63-100.
  19. Jeon, S., Yoon, J., & Kim, Y. (2016). Analysis of legislative comparion for national scientific data management and use. Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference, 574-583.
  20. Choi, M-S. (2017). Policy landscape of open research data. Industrial Engineering Magazine, 24(4), 30-35.
  21. Choi, M-S., Lee, S-B., & Lee, S. (2017). Research data management of science and technology research institutes in Korea. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 17(2), 117-126.
  22. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2017). Research and development on governance system, core technologies and applications for scientific data. KISTI Research Report. K-16-L03-C01.
  23. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (2019). Research data management and utilization for government-funded research institutes in Korea. Final report submitted to the National Research Council of Science and Technology.
  24. Assoication of College & Research Libraries (2003). Principles and strategies for the reform of scholarly communication 1. http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies
  25. Australian Research Council (n.d.). Research data management. Available at https://www.arc.gov.au/policies-strategies/strategy/research-data-management
  26. Bishoff, C., & Johnston, L. (2015). Approaches to data sharing: An analysis of NSF data management plans from a large research university. Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.1231
  27. Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. MIT press.
  28. Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. MIT press. 심원식, 현은희 공역.(2010). 빅데이터, 새로운 깨달음의 시대. 서울: 성균관대학교 출판부.
  29. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (2015). Australian Government Public Data Policy Statement. Available at https://www.pmc.gov.au/resource-centre/public-data/australian-government-public-data-policy-statement
  30. Digital Curation Centre (n.d.). Overview of funders' data policies. Available at http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/policy-and-legal/overview-funders-data-policies
  31. European Research Council (2017). Guidelines on implementation of open access to scientific publications and research data. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/oa-pilot/h2020-hi-erc-oa-guide_en.pdf
  32. Higman, R., & Pinfield, S. (2015). Research data management and openness: The role of data sharing in developing institutional policies and practices. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 49(4), 364-381. https://doi.org/10.1108/prog-01-2015-0005
  33. Jones, S. (2012). Developments in research funder data policy. IJDC, 7(1), 114-125. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v7i1.219
  34. Kennan, M. A., & Kingsley, D. A. (2009). The state of the nation: A snapshot of australian institutional repositories. First Monday, 14(2). Retrieved from https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2282/2092
  35. National Health and Medical Research Council (2018). The australian code for the responsible conduct of research.
  36. National Health and Medical Research Council (2019). Management of data and information in research: A guide supporting the Australian code for the responsible conduct of research. Available at https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/australian-code-responsible-conduct-research-2018
  37. National Science Foundation. data management plan. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/bfa/dias/policy/dmp.jsp
  38. Office of Science and Technology Policy (2013. 2. 22.). Increasing access to the results of federally funded scientific research. Available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf
  39. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007). OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Paris, France: OECD.
  40. Productivity Commission (2017). Data availability and use. Available at https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/data-access/report
  41. Raboin, R., Reznik-Zellen, R. C., & Salo, D. (2013). Forging new service paths: Institutional approaches to providing research data management services. Journal of eScience Librarianship, 1(3), 2.
  42. RCUK (2011). 'Common principles for data policy'. Available at: www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/datapolicy/
  43. RCUK (2015). 'Concordat on open research data launched'. Press release. Available at: www.rcuk.ac.uk/media/news/160728
  44. SHARE (2016, August). A decade of NCRIS investment in data. Newsletter of the Australian National Data Service, 26.
  45. University of Sydney (2018). Research data management policy 2014. Amended. Available at http://sydney.edu.au/policies/showdoc.aspx?recnum=PDOC2013/337
  46. Whyte, A., & Donnelly, M (2016). Common directions in research data policy: A briefing for institutions. DCC briefing papers. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Available online: http://www.dcc.ac.uk/resources/briefing-papers