한국지반공학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society)

한국지반공학회 (Korean Geotechnical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 화강 풍화대 지반의 표준관입시험 N 값과 프레셔미터시험 결과의 상관관계에 대한 사례 분석

Case Study of Correlation between the SPT-N Value and PMT Results Performed on Weathered Granite Zone in Korea

  • 이승환 (서울대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 백성하 (한국건설기술연구원 미래융합연구본부) ;
  • 송영우 (서울대학교 건설환경종합연구소) ;
  • 정충기 (서울대학교 건설환경공학부)
  • Lee, Seung-Hwan (Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engrg., Seoul National Univ.) ;
  • Baek, Sung-Ha (Dept. of Future Technology and Convergence Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engrg. and Building Technology) ;
  • Song, Young-Woo (Institute of Construction and Environmental Engrg., Seoul National Univ.) ;
  • Chung, Choong-Ki (Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engrg., Seoul National Univ.)
  • 투고 : 2019.08.19
  • 심사 : 2019.11.05
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

국내 다수의 지역에 분포하는 화강 풍화대 지반은 지반구조물의 주요 지지층으로 활용되고 있으므로 화강 풍화대의 지반특성을 평가하는 것은 중요하다. 풍화대 지반은 실내시험을 위한 불교란 시료를 채취하는 것이 어렵기 때문에 일반적으로 표준관입시험(SPT: Standard penetration test)을 통해 지반특성을 평가하고 있다. 프레셔미터시험(PMT: Pressuremeter test)은 풍화대 지반의 응력 - 변형률 거동을 신뢰도 높게 평가하는 대표적인 현장시험이지만 소요 시간과 비용의 제약으로 제한적인 시험만을 수행하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 화강 풍화대에서 수행된 SPT-N60 값과 PMT 결과의 상관성 분석을 수행하였으며, N60 - Em(Em: Pressuremeter modulus)과 N60 - PL(PL: Limit pressure) 관계식을 제안하였고 선행 연구 결과와 비교 분석하였다.

Weathered granite zone exists in most regions of Korea and it is often used as a bearing stratum of geotechnical structures. So it is very important to estimate the characteristics of weathered granite zone. SPT (Standard penetration test) is usually performed to investigate the characteristics of the weathered zone because undisturbed samples suitable for laboratory testing are hardly retrieved. PMT (Pressuremeter test) can reliably evaluate the in situ stress-strain behavior, but it is rarely conducted because of their high cost and time-consuming procedure. In this study, the correlation between the SPT-N values and the PMT results, obtained from the weathered granite zone, was analyzed. Empirical equations for pressuremeter modulus (Em) and limit pressure (PL) were suggested and compared with the previous research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, Y.K., Kwon, O.S., Lee, J.S., Choi, S.S., and Jang, S.M. (2010), "An Analysis on Co-relationships between In-situ Investigation Methods and End Bearing Capacity of a Drilled Shaft Socketed into the Weathered Zone", Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.30, No.2C, pp.95-107.
  2. Do, J.N., Hwang, P.J., Chung, S.R., and Chun, B.S. (2011), "Analysis on Relation of S-wave Velocity and N Value for Stratums in Chungcheong Buk-do", Journal of the Korean Geo-environmental Society, Vol.12, No.10, pp.13-22.
  3. Gang, B.J., Hwang, B.S., and Cho, W.J. (2018), "Empirical Estimation of Soil Constants Using Standard Penetration Test N Value", Journal of the Korean Geo-environmental Society, Vol.19, No.6, pp.5-12.
  4. Korea expressway corporation (2002), "Normalizations of the Standard Penetration Test".
  5. Lee, S.G. (1993), "Weathering of Granite", Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, Vol.29, No.4, pp.396-413.
  6. Lee, W. J., Yu, J. M., and Ryu, D. H. (2001), "Energy Correction and Use of Standard Penetration Test N Value", In Proceeding of '01 Korean Geotechnical Society Fall Conference, Seoul, pp.241-264.
  7. Seoul metropolitan (2006), "Site investigation manual".
  8. Sun, C.G., Kim, B.H., and Chung, C.K. (2006), "Investigation on Weathering Degree and Shear Wave Velocity of Decomposed Granite Layer in Hongsung", Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.26, No.6C, pp.431-443.
  9. ASTM (2007), "Standard test methods for prebored pressurmeter testing in soils".
  10. ASTM (2011), "Standard test method for standard penetration test (SPT) and split-barrel sampling of soils",
  11. ASTM (2011), "Standard practice for determining the normalized penetration resistance of sand for evaluation of liquefaction potential".
  12. Benoit, J. and Howie, J. A. (2014), "A View of Pressuremeter Testing in North America", SOILS and ROCKS, 211.
  13. Bozbey I and Togrol E (2008), "Correlation of Pressuremeter and SPT Test Results in Sandy and Clayey Soils", In: Proceedings of 12th National Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Konya (in Turkish) pp.217-228.
  14. Cheshomi, A. and Ghodrati, M. (2015), "Estimating Menard Pressuremeter Modulus and Limit Pressure from SPT in Silty Sand and Silty Clay Soils. A Case Study in Mashhad, Iran", Geomechanics and Geoengineering, Vol.10, No.3, pp.194-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2014.933894
  15. Chiang, Y. C. and Ho, Y. M. (1980), "Pressuremeter Method for Foundation Design in Hong Kong", In Proceedings of the Sixth Southeast Asian Conference on Soil Engineering, pp.31-42.
  16. Clayton, C. R., Matthews, M. C., and Simons, N. E. (1995), "Site investigation: A handbook for engineers", Blackwell Science.
  17. Dasaka, S. M. and Zhang, L. M. (2012), "Spatial Variability of in Situ Weathered Soil", Geotechnique, Vol.62, No.5, pp.375-384. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.8.P.151.3786
  18. Korean Geotechnical Society, (2003), "Interpretation and application of the site investigation results".
  19. Kovacs, W. D. and Salomone, L. A. (1982), "SPT Hammer Energy Measurement", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.108, No.4, pp.599-620.
  20. Meyerhof, G. G. (1956), "Penetration Test and Bearing Capacity of Cohesionless Soils", Journal of Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ASCE, Vol.82, No.SM1, pp.1-19.
  21. Ohya S, Imai T, and Matsubara M (1982), "Relationship between N value by SPT and LLT Pressuremeter Results", Proceedings, 2. European symposium on penetration testing, pp.125-130.
  22. OYO corporation (2008), "Operation manual model-4018 elastometer-2 indicator".
  23. Phoon, K. K. and Kulhawy, F. H. (1999), "Evaluation of Geotechnical Property Variability", Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.36, No.4, pp.625-639. https://doi.org/10.1139/t99-039
  24. Schmertmann, J. H. (1978), "Use of the SPT to measure dynamic soil properties, dynamic geotechnical testing", ASTM SPT 654, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp.341-355.
  25. Schmertmann, J. H. and Palacios, A. (1979), "Energy Dynamics of SPT", Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol.105, No.8, pp.909-926. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000839
  26. Seed, H. B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L.F., and Chung, R. M. (1985), "Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations", Journal of the GED, ASCE, Vol.111, No.GT12, pp.1425-1446.
  27. Skempton, A. W. (1986), "Standard Penetration Test Procedures and the Effects in Sands of Overburden Pressure, Relative Density, Particle Size, Aging and Overconsolidation", Geotechnique, Vol.36, No.3, pp.425-447. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.425
  28. Suzuki, Y., GOTO, S., Hatanaka, M., and Tokimatsu, K. (1993). "Correlation between Strengths and Penetration Resistances for Gravelly Soils", Soils and Foundations, Vol.33, No.1, pp.92-101. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.33.92
  29. Yagiz S, Akyol E, and Sen G (2008), "Relationship between the Standard Penetration Test and the Pressuremeter Test on Sandy Silty Clays: A Case Study from Denizli", Bull Eng Geol Environ, Vol.67. No.3, pp.405-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-008-0153-2
  30. Yoshinaka, R. (1968), "Lateral Coefficient of Subgrade Reaction", Civil Engineering Journal, Vol.10, No.1, pp.32-37.