Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Recognition of Modern Cultural Heritage Value of Japanese-style Building Groups Using Q Methodology - Focusing on Huam-dong, Seoul -

Q 방법론을 이용한 일본식 건물군의 근대문화유산 가치에 관한 인식 연구 - 서울시 후암동을 중심으로 -

  • Park, Han-Sol (Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sung, Jong-Sang (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 박한솔 (서울대학교 대학원 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 성종상 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과)
  • Received : 2019.09.23
  • Accepted : 2019.12.17
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Huam-dong is a representative area from the Japanese colonial period and is the space where most Japanese-style buildings remain in Seoul. Interest in modern cultural heritage continues to increase, including the registration of cultural properties in 2001, building assets in 2015, and the registration of cultural property units in 2018. As the debate continues over the necessity of preserving cultural heritage that reminds us of the Japanese colonial, there is a need for research to grasp the perceptions of stakeholders along with the perceived value of such spaces. This study identified the subjective perception types of the stakeholders concerned with the Japanese-style building group in Huam-dong, analyzed characteristics by types, and debated the issues. For this purpose, Q methodology, which is a statistical technique for measuring human self-subjectivity and extracting common human perspectives, was used. A literature study on the values of Huam-dong and modern cultural heritage was conducted, and a Q questionnaire based on five aspects of modern cultural heritage values (historical, architectural, sociocultural, landscape, and economic) was applied. The results of the study depicted three types of cognition and showed different attitudes toward the Japanese building group. This study found a conflict comparing the perceptional differences between the types of cognition. This study is meaningful in that it provides an in-depth approach to the perspectives of the stakeholders concerned with the Japanese-style buildings clustered in central Seoul. It is also meant to present a theoretical framework that can be applied to the use area as sustainable cultural heritage through the establishment of preservation and utilization of Japanese-style areas and conflict resolution.

후암동은 일제강점기의 대표적인 일본인 거주지로 서울 내에 가장 많은 일본식 건물이 남아있는 공간이다. 2001년 등록문화재, 2015년 건축자산, 2018년 문화재청의 선·면 단위 문화재 등록제도가 지정되는 등 근대문화유산에 관한 관심은 높아지고 있다. 또한, 일제강점기 수탈의 기억을 떠올리게 하는 근대문화유산 보존의 필요성에 대한 논쟁이 심화되면서, 가치평가와 함께 이해관계자의 인식을 파악하는 연구가 요구되고 있다. 본 연구는 후암동 일본식 건물군에 관한 이해관계자(소유자, 임대자, 방문자)의 주관적 인식유형을 확인하고, 유형별 특징을 분석, 논점을 도출하였다. 연구방법으로는 인간의 주관적 인식을 조사하여 유형화할 수 있는 통계적 기법인 Q 방법론을 활용하였다. 후암동과 근대문화유산 가치에 관한 문헌연구를 진행, 5가지 측면의 근대문화유산 가치(역사적, 건축적, 사회문화적, 경관적, 경제적 가치)를 바탕으로 Q 설문을 진행하였다. 연구결과, 일본식 건물군에 대한 3가지의 인식유형(유형1:사회문화·역사적 가치 결합형, 유형2:경제적 가치 중시형, 유형3:사회문화·경제적 가치 결합형)이 도출되었다. 이후 본 연구는 유형 간 인식 차이를 비교하여 가치충돌 지점을 발견하였다. 본 연구는 서울 중심부에 밀집된 일본식 건물군에 대하여 이해관계자들이 가지고 있는 관점에 대해 심층적으로 접근하였다는 점에서 의미가 있다. 또한, 향후 일본식 건물 밀집 지역에 대한 보존 및 활용의 기초자료 구축과 갈등 해결을 통한 지속 가능한 면적 문화유산 활용에 적용할 수 있는 이론적 틀을 제시하였다는 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, S. R.(1980) Political Subjectivity: Applications of QMethodology in Political Science. New Heaven, CT: Yale University Press.
  2. Cho, I. S.(2012) A Study on the Improvement of Publicness with the Regeneration of Historic Buildings. M. D. Dissertation, Chonnam National University.
  3. Cho, I. S.(2016a) A Study on the Remodeling Strategies of Historical Building and the Cognitive Evaluation. Ph. D. Dissertation, Chonnam National University.
  4. Cho, J. A.(2018) A study on subjectivity of college students on contraception. Journal of KSSSS 43(0): 27-45.
  5. Cho, M. R.(2001) Articles: A study on government - Citizen networks for the preservation of modern cultural heritages. Commnity Development Review 26(1): 187-200.
  6. Cho, S. S.(2016b) A study on possibility of eco-museum composition using rural modern cultural heritage. Jouranl fo Museum Scholarship 30(0): 65-89.
  7. Choi J. N., and S. H. Lee(2013) Modern cultural heritage value and utilization of archiving data in Daejeon. Journal of Digital Convergence 11(7): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.7.001
  8. Dan, S. H. and Y. J. Choi(2017) The complex library planning using of modern cultural heritage. Journal of the Institute of Constructional Technology 36(2): 43-50.
  9. Financial news(2019) Japanese style building. January 20, 31.
  10. Herald Economic(2019) 100 Years of Japanese-Style Building ... Become a Consumption Space in Historical Space. February 28, 1.
  11. Hong, S. J.(2008a) The formation and transformation of urban identity with special reference to discourses on modern cultural heritage. The Journal of Korean Studies 19: 77-106.
  12. Hong, S. Y.(2008b) Study on Method to Regeneration Following the Conservation Value of Modern Architectural. Ph. D. Dissertation, DongA University.
  13. Hong, S. Y.(2019) An explorative study of perception on environmental awareness of elementary school students using Q methodology. Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers 8(2): 139-154. https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.8.2.3
  14. Je, J. S. and B. H. Song(2017) Modern cultural heritage in Busan and issues of historical awareness. Hangdo Busan 33(0): 141. https://doi.org/10.19169/hd.2017.2.33.141
  15. Jeon, S. J.(1999) A Study On Conservation of the Modern Buildings to exist actually in KangKyoung. M. D. Dissertation, Chungnam National University.
  16. JoongAng Ilbo(2019) The first town under Mt.Nam in Seoul, The alleyway where time is also scattered. March 12, A20.
  17. Jung, Y. S.(2005) A Study on the Application to Criteria for Conservation of Modern Buildings. M. D. Dissertation, Dongeui National University.
  18. Kim, G. H.(2017) An Economic Valuation of Preserving Modern Architecture by Contingent Valuation Method. M. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.
  19. Kim, I. H.(2016a) The study on modern cultural sites of Shin-hang Li, Asan. Journal of Humanities and Science at Soonchunhyang University 35(4): 5-30.
  20. Kim, S. E.(2010a) Theory and philosophy of Q methodology. Korean Society and Public Administraction 20(4): 1-25.
  21. Kim, S. E.(2016b) Q Methodology & Social Siences. Seoul: JomteongMunhwa.
  22. Kim, S. J. and Y. T. Kim(2012). A study on the criteria for conservation value of modern architecture as culture heritage. Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea 14(1): 1-8.
  23. Kim, S. K.(2010b) Integrated Use of Modern Cultural Heritage in Pedestrian Network Planning of Ganggteong-eup. M. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.
  24. Lee, G. G.(1996) A Study on the Criteria for Preservation of Existing Buildings. M. D. Dissertation, Konkuk University.
  25. Lee, H. M.(2003) Present Situation Examination Study for Conservation and Reuse of a Modern Architecture: Focused on the Registry Cultural Assets, M. D. Dissertation, Hongik University.
  26. Lee, H. S.(2011) Research articles: The analysis of relationships between the residents 'The community attachment and their perceptions on modern cultural heritage. Journal of Tourism Sciences 35(10): 329-345.
  27. Lee, J. H. and M. J. Kim(2011) A study for estimating the preservation value of heritage tourism resource by a double-bound contingent valuation method. Journal of Tourism Management Research 15(4): 223-246.
  28. Lee, K. H. and J. I. Park(2018) Modern cultural heritage utilization using historial maps and satellite pictures. Journal of Korean Dance 40: 117-133.
  29. Lee, S. J.(2000) Conservation and Restoration of Modern Architecture as Cultural Properties in Korea. M. D. Dissertation, Chongju University.
  30. Oh, M. J. and K. E. Cho(2017) Examining the relationships among interpretation program for visitors, perceived authenticity, attitudes towards conservation of heritage, and perception of tourism invigoration at cultural heritage sites. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research 31(7): 48-66
  31. Ok, S. S. and H. J. Park(2011) Value of modern cultural heritage using contingent value method and real option approach: The study of Seoul City Hall case. Review of Culture & Economy 14(2): 53-74.
  32. Park, G. S.(2003) Study on the Composition Scheme for Conservation Guidance of Modern Architecture in Korea. Ph. D. Dissertation, Myongji University.
  33. Park, H. S., S. J. Lee, K. H. Park and E. G. Chang(2010) Conflict Management in Spatial Development Projects. Anyang: Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  34. Park, J. H. and K. J. Shin(2014) The types of experts’ consciousness for the conservation and utilization of modern architecture. Journal Korea Society of Visual Design Forum 42(0): 307-318.
  35. Park, J. M. and J. S. Sung(2013). A study on the value criteria and relative importance for conservation of modern cultural heritage. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 41(1): 12-20. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2013.41.1.012
  36. Park, K. K., H. J. Ju and O. I. Kim(2001) Analyzing the perception types regarding whistle-blowing within the organization: An application of Q methodology. Korean Public Administration Review 35(1): 109-125.
  37. Randall M.(2002) Assessing Value in Conservation Planning: Methodological Issues and Choices. In Assessing the Values of Cultural Heritage. 5-30. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
  38. Ryu, B. S.(2016a) Modern cultural heritage and history of Gunsan. National University Library 34: 5-20.
  39. Ryu, J. S.(2016b) The News Perception of Journalists and News Users in Digital Media Age based on Q Methodology and Depth Interview. Ph. D. Dissertation, Sung Kyun Kwan University.
  40. SBS(2019) Newstory 220, An uncomfortable heritage. February 16.
  41. Seoul Museum of History(2016) Huam-dong:the History of Duk-tuk Rock, Life in a Cultural House. Seoul:Seoul Museum of History.
  42. Son, E. S. and J. H. Pae(2018) Conflicts between the conservation and removal of the modern historic landscapes. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 46(4): 21-35. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2018.46.4.021
  43. Song, Y. and J. S. Kim(2012) Valuing of cultural heritage using contingent valuation method. Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research 24(2): 253-267.
  44. Song, J. Y. and N. J. Kim(2018) The effect relationship between objective authenticity, experience, existential authenticity and satisfaction of modern cultural heritage site. International Journal of Tourism Management and Sciences 33(5): 48-66.
  45. Whang, S. M and E. H. Choe(2002) Q-methodology and theory. Journal of KSSSS 7(0): 4-26.
  46. Yang, E. J.(2012) Changes of Conservation Plans for a Historic City Center in Gunsan-Based on Content Analyses of Gunsan City Plans, M. D. Dissertation, Seoul National University.