Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Selection and Application of Evaluation Factors for Urban Regeneration Project

도시재생사업의 평가요인 선정 및 적용

  • 장철규 (대구대학교 도시.조경학부)
  • Received : 2019.10.17
  • Accepted : 2019.12.05
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to suggest indicator-based selection and improvement plans for evaluating urban regeneration projects. First, we selected the indicators by conducting expert surveys and analysis of the responses received. Additionally, using the selected indicators, we analyzed the residents' opinions in Wongogae Village, where urban regeneration projects were in progress. Based on these, we suggested a plan to improve Wongogae Village. According to the study, we classified the urban regeneration evaluation indicators into 'Physical environment', 'Social environment' and 'Economic environment' according to their characteristics. We selected urban regeneration evaluation factors through the first expert survey and MCB analysis. As a result, we selected six factors for the 'Physical environment' category: 'Traffic and pedestrian environment', 'Residential (housing) environment', 'Safety and security environment', 'Greenspace', 'Landscape improvement' and 'Public space', In the 'Social environment' category, four factors were chosen: 'Resident participation', 'Community activation', 'Role of the local government and support centers' and 'Resident education' while for the 'Economic environment' category three factors were selected: 'Local economic revitalization', 'Creating an economy-based environment', 'Job creation'. Next, we conducted a second expert survey and carried out an AHP analysis using the selected evaluation factors to derive the overall weight for each. Among the evaluation factors for urban regeneration, the 'Residential (housing) environment' has the highest weighted value of 0.108, followed by 'Local economic revitalization' and 'Resident participation'. Lastly, the analysis of the residents' opinions of Wongogae Village using the urban regeneration evaluation factors, Parking environment', 'Maintenance of old houses and living environment', 'Environment for founding town and social enterprises', 'Improve commercial and business environment', 'Maintain and activate existing business' and 'Vitalizing small regional economies such as domestic handicrafts and side-job' had high overall importance, but low satisfaction, which means that it is necessary to improve the focus. Therefore, in order to improve the urban regeneration project in villages, it is necessary to improve the parking environment by expanding public parking lots, eliminate close houses, and idle lands, or open a school playground in the village for the residents. In addition, it is essential to encourage economic activities, such as fostering village enterprises and social enterprises in connection with cooperatives and allow for the selling of the products through resident activities, such as neighboring markets.

본 연구는 도시재생사업을 평가하기 위한 지표 선정 및 개선방안을 제시하기 위해 연구를 진행하였다. 먼저 도시재생 관련 전문가를 대상으로 설문조사 및 분석을 수행하여 평가지표를 선정하였으며, 선정된 지표를 활용하여 도시재생사업이 시행 중인 원고개 마을의 주민의견을 수렴·분석하였다. 이를 바탕으로 해당지역의 개선방안을 제시하였다. 연구결과를 살펴보면, 도시재생 평가지표를 그 특성에 따라 '물리적 환경', '사회적 환경', '경제적 환경' 부문으로 구분하고, 1차 전문가 설문 및 MCB 분석을 통해 도시재생 평가요인을 선정하였다. 그 결과, '물리적 환경' 부문은 '교통 및 보행환경', '주거(주택) 환경', '안전 및 보안환경', '녹지 공간', '경관 개선', '공공 공간' 등 6개 요인이 선정되었으며, '사회적 환경' 부문은 '주민 참여', '공동체 활성화', '지자체 및 지원센터 역할', '주민 교육' 등 4개의 요인, '경제적 환경'부문은 '지역경제 활성화', '경제기반 환경조성', '일자리 창출' 등 3개의 평가요인이 선정되었다. 다음으로 선정된 평가요인을 2차 전문가 설문 및 AHP 분석을 수행하여 종합가중치를 도출하였다. 도시재생 평가요인 가운데 '주거(주택) 환경'이 0.108로 가장 높은 가중치 값을 가지며, 다음으로 '지역경제 활성화', '주민참여' 가 높은 값을 가지는 것으로 분석되었다. 마지막으로 도시재생 평가요인을 활용하여 원고개 마을의 주민의식을 분석한 결과, '주차환경', '노후주택 및 생활환경 정비', '마을 및 사회적 기업을 조성할 수 있는 환경조성', '상가 및 업무환경 개선', '기존 상권 유지 및 활성화', '가내수공업, 부업 등 소규모 지역경제 활성화' 등이 종합중요도는 높지만 만족도는 낮아 중점 개선이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 원고개 마을의 도시재생사업을 개선하기 위해선 공가 및 폐가, 유휴지 등을 활용하여 공용주차장을 조성하거나, 마을 내 위치한 학교운동장을 주민들에게 개방하는 등의 주차환경 개선이 필요할 것으로 판단된다. 또한 협동조합과 연계하여 마을기업, 사회적 기업을 육성하고, 주민활동을 통해 생산된 제품을 주변시장에 판매하는 등의 경제적 활동을 장려시켜야 할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, J. G., H. C. Jeong, T. J. Kim and J. H. Lee(2014) A study on the planning factors and residents satisfaction of urban regeneration in large cities. Journal of Korea Planning Association 49(3): 211-226.
  2. Ahn, J. S.(2014) Regeneration of Urban Village through Using Shared Space: Focusing on Sansae-Village, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul. MS Dissertation, Seoul National University, Korea.
  3. An, J. S.(2011) Developing Evaluation Criteria for Historic Gardens Preservation Condition by Applying Delphi Technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process. Ph.D. Dissertation. Sungkyunkwan University, Korea.
  4. Bae, W. K. and H. Y. Lee(2014) Effectiveness analysis on the lowrise housing regeneration program(before 'human town') in Seoul, Korea: Focused on the first pilot project area of Yeonnam-dong, Mapo-gu, Seoul, Korea. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design 15(4): 223-238.
  5. Cho, H. J.(2008) Establishment of the Landscape Ecological Planning Model and Applying Standard. MS Dissertation, Kyungpook National University, Korea.
  6. Chu, H. S., T. Y. Baek and J. M. Kang(2018) Review of the physical evaluation factors of the campustown project: Focused on Seoul campustown project. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers 38(1): 149-157. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2018.38.1.0149
  7. Choi, G. C.(2008) An Study on the Effects of Pattern Language in a Revitalization of the Old Downtown Area. MS Dissertation, Hanyang University, Korea.
  8. Daegu metropolitan city(2016) 2025 Urban Renewal Report.
  9. Daegu metropolitan city(2017) Daegu Statistical Annual Report in 2016.
  10. Duke, C. R. and M. A. Persia(1996) Consumer-defined dimensions for the escorted tour industry segment: Expectations, satisfactions, and importance. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing 5(1/2): 77-99. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v05n01_06
  11. Ha, C. H., H. J. Kwak and H. S. Kim(2013) A study on utilization and making vegetable garden of vacant land and deserted house in deteriorated low-rise residential area for neighborhood regeneration: Focused on no-song low-rise residence district in Jeonju. Journal of The Urban Design Institute of Korea 14(6): 81-93.
  12. Ha, Y. S.(2016) An analytical study on the relationship between urban regeneration evaluation and civic consciousness: With a focus on mediation effect of maul satisfaction. Journal of Public Society 6(4): 121-155. https://doi.org/10.21286/jps.2016.11.6.4.121
  13. Hammitt, W. E., M. D. Bixer and P. Francis.(1996) Going beyond important performance analysis to analyze the observance- influence of park impact. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 14(1): 45-62.
  14. Jang, C. K., M. L. Hwang, J. Y. Shin and S. G. Jung(2017) Analysis of satisfaction on Alley Garden’s components by urban regeneration. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 45(6): 137-148. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2017.45.6.137
  15. Jang, K. S.(2016) A study on promotion of urban regeneration program: Focusing on the experiences in the operation of Jeonju testbed project. Public Land Law Review 76: 25-44.
  16. Jin, H. S.(2012) The meaning of Maeul mandeulgie and urban regeneration in the view of public. Review of Architecture and Building Science 56(6): 66-70.
  17. Jung, S. G., K. J. Moon and K. J. Yoo(2016) A study on related party consciousness for urban regeneration activation: Concentrated on the Sanbok-doro renaissance urban regeneration area in Busan. Journal of The Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea 18(1): 131-140.
  18. Kang, M. H., H. S. Song and M. H. Lee(2017) A study on the difference of perceptions on major elements of urban regeneration between residents and experts: Focused on urban regeneration areas in Seoul. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design 18(3): 45-59. https://doi.org/10.38195/judik.2017.06.18.3.45
  19. Kim, A. L. and J. H. Koo(2014) A study on determinants of elderly residental satisfaction on the planned elements of the participatory residential environment improving projects: Focused on the project of Yonnam-dong. Journal of the Korean Housing Association 25(5): 125- 132. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2014.25.5.125
  20. Kim, K. S.(2014) The effect of urban regeneration on the village satisfaction and community spirit of the citizens of Seoul. Journal of Public Society 4(1): 66-92.
  21. Kim. K. Y.(2016) An Analytical Study on the Urban Regeneration in Changwon and Proposals to Improve the Projects. Ph.D. Dissertation. Gyeongsang National University, Korea.
  22. Kim, T. D., S. A. Sung and H. Y. Hwang(2014) Comparative resident satisfaction studies between Changwon and Cheongju regeneration projects. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 22(2): 153-181.
  23. Kim, S. W.(2012) A Study on Urban Regeneration Strategy of Old Downtown in Small-Medium Sized Cities Using the Concept of Compact City: Focus on Gumpo Railway Station Sphere Development District. Ph.D. Dissertation., Hanyang University, Korea.
  24. Kuehl, R. O.(2000) Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis: 2nd Edition. Duxbury Resource Center, CA: Pacific Grove.
  25. Lai, I. W. and M. Hitchcock(2015) Importance-performance analysis in tourism: A framework for researchers. Tourism Management 48: 242-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.11.008
  26. Lee, B. D and J. S. Shim(2012) A study on regeneration of derelict urban areas throughout resident's participation: Focusing on the comparison of case studies from Japan, England and the US. Journal of the Korean Cadastre Information Association 14(2): 183-206.
  27. Lee, B, D and J. U. Dong(2005) A study on the improvement projects of resident environment in the poor residence for low income families in inner city. Journal of Korea Community Development Society 30(2): 91-103.
  28. Lee, H. J., Y. J. Kim and J. G. Kim(2014) Assessment of the urban design elements in urban regeneration space of community business type. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design 15(6): 17-31.
  29. Lee, I. H. and J. H. Lee(2011) A study on the urban planning elements for sustainable urban regeneration. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design 12(6): 101-114.
  30. Lee, I. S.(1998) Analysis of consistency and accuracy of analytic hierarchy process using various ratio scales and simplified procedure. Journal of Korea Planning Association 33(3): 347-362.
  31. Lee, J. K., R. H. Kim, H. J. Kim and S. S. Lee(2016) A study on the order of priority of evaluation․monitoring measures in urban regeneration projects: Focused on 13 priority areas for urban regeneration. Journal of Urban Policies 7(1): 5-22.
  32. Martila. J. A. and J. C. James(1977) Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing 41(1): 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  33. McCarthy, J. and G. Lloyd(2007) Partnership, Collaborative Planning and Urban Regeneration. Urban and Regional Planning and Development Series. Hampshire: Ashgate Pub Ltd.
  34. Park, D. K., D. W. Jeong and H. S. Kim(2009) Assessment of the downtown regeneration project based on the analysis of planning factors. Journal of the Korean Urban Management Association 22(3): 295-316.
  35. Park, K. O, J. M. An, Y. B. Lee and A. Y. Cha(2016) Sustainable regeneration ways of the deteriorated downtown residential area: Focused on ‘Mural Village’, Suamgol in Cheongju. Journal of Human Ecology 20(2): 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2006.11905909
  36. Sang, N. K.(2010) Toward a Collaborative Implementation Model for Urban Regeneration in Seoul: With special reference to Se-Woon District. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Seoul, Korea.
  37. Saaty, T. L.(1977) A theory of analytical hierarchies applied to political candidacy. Behavioral Science 22(4): 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830220402
  38. Saaty, T. L.(1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  39. Saaty, T. L.(2003) Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research 145(4): 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00227-8
  40. Shin, E. J., C. G. Yoo and S. J. Cho(2015) A study on local residents' evaluation of the planned indicator value for urban regeneration: Targeting local residents in Mokpo. Journal of the Korean Housing Association 26(6): 71-81. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2015.26.6.071
  41. Shin, H. J. and M. G. Kang(2017) Level of community participation in urban regeneration: Focusing on Haebangchon case, Yongsan-gu, Seoul. Journal of The Korean Regional Development Association 29(3): 25-46.
  42. Suh, J. H., H. S. Yang(2004) A study on framing techniques of landscape assessment using the analytic hierarchy process: The assessment on the landscape control points. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 32(4): 94-104.
  43. Tchah, C. Y. and K. R. Lim(2011) Public Architecture and Public Space Utilization towards Urban Regeneration of Small and Mediumsized cities. Sejong: Architecture & Urban Research Institute.
  44. Won, J. H. and H. S. Kim(2012) Factors affecting the evaluation of the resident-participatory community design: Focused on the residents’ perception about ‘the pilot project of human town in Seoul’. Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea 13(6): 55-68.
  45. www.law.go.kr
  46. www.naver.com
  47. www.seoguurc.or.kr