DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

딥러닝 기반 BIM(Building Information Modeling) 벽체 하위 유형 자동 분류 통한 정합성 검증에 관한 연구

Using Deep Learning for automated classification of wall subtypes for semantic integrity checking of Building Information Models

  • 정래규 (서울과학기술대학교 건설시스템공학과) ;
  • 구본상 (서울과학기술대학교 건설시스템공학과) ;
  • 유영수 (서울과학기술대학교 건설시스템공학과)
  • 투고 : 2019.11.19
  • 심사 : 2019.11.19
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31

초록

With Building Information Modeling(BIM) becoming the de facto standard for data sharing in the AEC industry, additional needs have increased to ensure the data integrity of BIM models themselves. Although the Industry Foundation Classes provide an open and neutral data format, its generalized schema leaves it open to data loss and misclassifications This research applied deep learning to automatically classify BIM elements and thus check the integrity of BIM-to-IFC mappings. Multi-view CNN(MVCC) and PointNet, which are two deep learning models customized to learn and classify in 3 dimensional non-euclidean spaces, were used. The analysis was restricted to classifying subtypes of architectural walls. MVCNN resulted in the highest performance, with ACC and F1 score of 0.95 and 0.94. MVCNN unitizes images from multiple perspectives of an element, and was thus able to learn the nuanced differences of wall subtypes. PointNet, on the other hand, lost many of the detailed features as it uses a sample of the point clouds and perceived only the 'skeleton' of the given walls.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bazjanac, V., Kiviniemi, A. (2007). Reduction, simplification, translation and interpretation in the exchange of model data, In CIB W, 78, pp. 163-168.
  2. Belsky, M., Sacks, R., Brilakis, I. (2016). Semantic enrichment for building information modeling, Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 31(4), pp. 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12128
  3. Bennett, K. P., Campbell, C. (2000). Support vector machines: hype or hallelujah?, Acm Sigkdd Explorations Newsletter, 2(2), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/380995.380999
  4. BIMCollective, IfcOpenShell, http://ifcopenshell.org (2016)
  5. Bloch, T., Sacks, R., (2018). Comparing machine learning and rule-based inferencing for semantic enrichment of BIM models, Automation in Construction, 91, pp. 256-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.03.018
  6. Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., LeCun, Y., Szlam, A., Vandergheynst, P., (2017). Geometric deep learning: going beyond euclidean data, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(4), pp. 18-42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.2693418
  7. Construction Specifications Institute, Omniclass, https://www.csiresources.org/practice/standards/omniclass (2017)
  8. Eastman, C. M., Jeong, Y. S., Sacks, R., Kaner, I. (2009). Exchange model and exchange object concepts for implementation of national BIM standards, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 24(1), pp. 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2010)24:1(25)
  9. Kim, H., Choi, J., Kim, H., Kim, I. (2013). The Development of Data Model for Open BIM-Based Schematic Estimates - Focused on Construction Type for Actual Cost of Public Projects, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning and Design, 29(3), pp. 61-70. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2013.29.3.61
  10. Kim, J., Moon, J., Joo, K. (2012). Proposal of roadmap and basic research of Information model standards for application on the BIM on civil engineering, ournal of Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 13(12), pp. 6176-6186. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.12.6176
  11. Koo, B., La, S., Cho, N. W., Yu, Y. (2019). Using support vector machines to classify building elements for checking the semantic integrity of building information models, Automation in Construction, pp. 98, 183-194.
  12. Ma, L., Sacks, R. Kattell, U. (2017), Building Model Object Classification for Semantic Enrichment Using Geometric Features and Pairwise Spatial Relations, in 2017 Leand and Computing in Construction Congress(LC3), pp. 373-380.
  13. Maturana, D., Scherer, S. (2015). Voxnet: A 3d convolutional neural network for real-time object recognition, In 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 922-928.
  14. Muller, M. P., Tomlinson, G., Marrie, T. J., Tang, P., McGeer, A., Low, D. E., Gold, W. L. (2005). Can routine laboratory tests discriminate between severe acute respiratory syndrome and other causes of community-acquired pneumonia?, Clinical infectious diseases, 40(8), pp. 1079-1086. https://doi.org/10.1086/428577
  15. National BIM Library, NBS, https://www.nationalbimlibrary.com/en/ (2017)
  16. Nepal, M. P., Staub-French, S., Pottinger, R., Zhang, J. (2012). Ontology-based feature modeling for construction information extraction from a building information model, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 27(5), pp. 555-569. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000230
  17. Pauwels, P., Terkaj, W. (2016). EXPRESS to OWL for construction industry: Towards a recommendable and usable ifcOWL ontology, Automation in Construction, 63, pp. 100-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.12.003
  18. Qi, C. R., Su, H., Mo, K., Guibas, L. J. (2017). Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 652-660.
  19. Su, H., Maji, S., Kalogerakis, E., Learned-Miller, E. (2015). Multi-view convolutional neural networks for 3d shape recognition, In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp. 945-953.
  20. Venugopal, M., Eastman, C. M., Sacks, R., Teizer, J. (2012). Semantics of model views for information exchanges using the industry foundation class schema, Advanced engineering informatics, pp. 26(2), 411-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2012.01.005
  21. Wu, Z., Song, S., Khosla, A., Yu, F., Zhang, L., Tang, X., Xiao, J. (2015). 3d shapenets: A deep representation for volumetric shapes, In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 1912-1920.