DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Automated Adaptive Finite Element Mesh Generation for Dynamics

  • Received : 2018.12.13
  • Accepted : 2018.12.18
  • Published : 2019.01.01

Abstract

Structural analysis remains as an essential part of any integrated civil engineering system in today's rapidly changing computing environment. Even with enormous advancements in capabilities of computers and mobile tools, enhancing computational efficiency of algorithms is necessary to meet the changing demands for quick real time response systems. The finite element method is still the most widely used method of computational structural analysis; a robust, reliable and automated finite element structural analysis module is essential in a modern integrated structural engineering system. To be a part of an automated finite element structural analysis, an efficient adaptive mesh generation scheme based on R-H refinement for the mesh and error estimates from representative strain values at Gauss points is described. A coefficient that depends on the shape of element is used to correct overly distorted elements. Two simple case studies show the validity and computational efficiency. The scheme is appropriate for nonlinear and dynamic problems in earthquake engineering which generally require a huge number of iterative computations.

Keywords

References

  1. Rabizuk T, Borda S, Zi GA. Three-dimensional meshfree method for continuous multiple-crack initiation, propagation and junction in statics and dynamics. Comp Mech. 2007 Jan;40:473-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-006-0122-1
  2. Zi G, Song JH, Lee SH. A new method for growing multiple cracks without remeshing and its application to fatique crack growth. J Kor Soc Civil Eng. 2005 Jan;25:183-190.
  3. Alfarra B, Lopez-Almansa F, Oller S. New methodology for calculating damage variable evolution in plastic damage model for RC structure. Eng Struct. 2017 Mar;132:70-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.022
  4. Snozzi L, Molinari JF. A cohesive element model for mixed mode loading with frictional mixed mode loading with frictional contact capability. IJNME. 2013 Jan;93(5):510-526. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4398
  5. Bathe KJ. Finite element procedures in engineering analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; c1982. 735 p.
  6. Belytschko T, Hughes JR, Bathe KJ. Finite element procedures. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; c1996. 999 p.
  7. Choi C, Jung H. Adaptive mesh generation for dynamic finite element analysis. J Kor Soc of Civil Eng. 1998 Mar;18(I-2):203-804.
  8. Jeong YC, Yoon C. Representative Strain Value Based Adaptive Mesh Generation for Plane Stress. Hongik J Science and Tech. 2003 Dec;7:71-86.
  9. Yoon C. Adap tive mesh generation f or dynamic f inite element analysis. J Kor Soc Civil Eng. 2005 Jun;25(6A):989-998.
  10. de Las Casas EB. R-H mesh improvement algorithms for the finite element Method. Ph.D. Dissertation. West Lafayette: Purdue University. c1988. 389p.
  11. Yoon C. Adaptive finite element mesh generation for dynamic planar problems. J Kor Soc Hazard Mitigation. 2014 Aug;14(4):43-49. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2014.14.4.43
  12. Newmark NM. A method of computation for structural dynamics. J Eng Mech Div. ASCE. 1959 Mar;85(EM3):67-94. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEA3.0000098
  13. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ. The Finite Element Method: Its Basis and Fundamentals, 6th ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; c2005. 689 p.