Journal of Ecology and Environment

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On the use of alternative water use efficiency parameters in dryland ecosystems: a review

  • Kang, Wenping (Department of Environment Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kang, Sinkyu (Department of Environment Science, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2019.03.31
  • Accepted : 2019.05.23
  • Published : 2019.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Water use efficiency (WUE) is an indicator of the trade-off between carbon uptake and water loss to the atmosphere at the plant or ecosystem level. Understanding temporal dynamics and the response of WUE to climatic variability is an essential part of land degradation assessments in water-limited dryland regions. Alternative definitions of and/or alternative methodologies used to measure WUE, however, have hampered intercomparisons among previous studies of different biomes and regions. The present study aims to clarify semantic differences among WUE parameters applied in previous studies and summarize these parameters in terms of their definition and methodology. Additionally, the consistency of the responses of alternative WUE parameters to interannual changes in moisture levels in Northeast Asia dryland regions (NADRs) was tested. Results: The literature review identified more than five different WUE parameters defined at leaf and ecosystem levels and indicates that major conclusions regarding the WUE response to climatic variability were partly inconsistent depending on the parameters used. Our demonstration of WUE in NADR again confirmed regional inconsistencies and further showed that inconsistencies were more distinct in hyper- and semi-arid climates than in arid climates, which might reflect the different relative roles of physical and biological processes in the coupled carbon-water process. Conclusions: The responses of alternative WUE parameters to drying and wetting may be different in different regions, and regionally different response seems to be related to aridity, which determines vegetation coverage.

Keywords

References

  1. Beer C, Ciais P, Reichstein M, Baldocchi D. Temporal and among-site variability of inherent water use efficiency at the ecosystem level. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2009;23:GB2018. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003233
  2. Begueria S, Vicente-Serrano SM, Reig F, Latorre B. Standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) revisited: parameter fitting, evapotranspiration models, tools, datasets and drought monitoring. Int J Climatol. 2014;34:3001-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3887
  3. Bjorkman O, Powles SB. Inhibition of photosynthetic reactions under water stress:interaction with light level. Planta. 1984;161:490-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00407081
  4. Brummer C, Black TA, Jassal RS, Grant NJ, Spittlehouse DL, Chen B, Nesic Z, Amiro BD, Arain MA, Barr AG. How climate and vegetation type influence evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in Canadian forest, peatland and grassland ecosystems. Agric For Meteorol. 2012;153:14-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.04.008
  5. Casper BB, Forseth IN, Wait DA. Variation in carbon isotope discrimination in relation to plant performance in a natural population of Cryptantha flava. Oecologia. 2005;145:541-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0162-9
  6. Chen Y, Li J, Ju W, Ruan H, Qin Z, Huang Y, Jeelani N, Padarian J, Propastin P. Quantitative assessments of water-use efficiency in Temperate Eurasian Steppe along an aridity gradient. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0179875. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179875
  7. Emmerich WE. Ecosystem water use efficiency in a semiarid shrubland and grassland community. Rangel Ecol Manag. 2007;60:464-70. https://doi.org/10.2111/1551-5028(2007)60[464:EWUEIA]2.0.CO;2
  8. Farquhar GD, O'Leary MHO, Berry JA. On the relationship between carbon isotope discrimination and the intercellular carbon dioxide concentration in leaves. Aust J Plant Physiol. 1982;9:121-37. https://doi.org/10.1071/PP9820121
  9. Ferretti DF, Pendall E, Morgan JA, Nelson JA, Lecain D, Mosier ARJP. Partitioning evapotranspiration fluxes from a Colorado grassland using stable isotopes:seasonal variations and ecosystem implications of elevated atmospheric $CO_2$. Plant Soil. 2003;254:291-303. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025511618571
  10. Flexas J, Bota J, Galmes J, Medrano H, Ribas-Carbo M. Keeping apositive carbon balanc eunder adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiol Plant. 2006;127:343-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00621.x
  11. Gang C, Wang Z, Chen Y, Yue Y, Li J, Cheng J, Qi J, Odeh I. Drought-induced dynamics of carbon and water use efficiency of global grasslands from 2000 to 2011. Ecol Indic. 2016;67:788-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.03.049
  12. Hu Z, Yu G, Wang Q, Zhao F. Ecosystem level water use efficiency: a review. Acta Ecol Sin. 2009;29:1498-507. https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.03.048
  13. Hu ZM, Yu G, Fu Y, Sun X, Li Y, Shi P, Wang Y, Zheng Z. Effects of vegetation control on ecosystem water use efficiency within and among four grassland ecosystems in China. Glob Chang Biol. 2008;14:1609-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01582.x
  14. Huang G, Li Y, Mu X, Zhao H, Cao Y. Water-use efficiency in response to simulated increasing precipitation in a temperate desert ecosystem of Xinjiang, China. J Arid Land. 2017a;9:823-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0021-7
  15. Huang L, He B, Han L, Liu J, Wang H, Chen Z. A global examination of the response of ecosystem water-use efficiency to drought based on MODIS data. Sci Total Environ. 2017b;601-602:1097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.084
  16. Huang M, PIao S, Sun Y, Ciais P, Cheng L, Mao J, Poulter B, Shi X, Zeng Z. Change in terrestrial ecosystem water-use efficiency over the last three decades. Glob Chang Biol. 2015;21:2366-78. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12873
  17. Huang M, Piao S, Zeng Z, Peng S, Ciais P, Cheng L, Mao J, Poulter B, Shi X, Yao Y. Seasonal responses of terrestrial ecosystem water-use efficiency to climate change. Glob Chang Biol. 2016;22:2165-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13180
  18. Jang K, Kang S, Lim YJ, Jeong S, Kim J, Kimball JS, Hong SY. Monitoring daily evapotranspiration in Northeast Asia using MODIS and a regional Land Data Assimilation System. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 2013;118:12927-12940. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020639
  19. Jang K, Kang S, Kim J, Hong SY. Retrievals of All-Weather Daily Air Temperature Using MODIS and AMSR-E Data. Remote Sensing. 2014;6(9):8387-8404. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6098387
  20. Lin YS, Medlyn BE, Duursma RA, Prentice IC, Wang H, Baig S, Eamus D, Dios VRD, Mitchell P, Ellsworth DS. Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world. Nat Clim Chang. 2015;5:459-64. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2550
  21. Liu Y, Xiao J, Ju W, Zhou Y, Wang S, Wu X. Water use efficiency of China’s terrestrial ecosystems and responses to drought. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13799. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13799
  22. Luo Y, Zhao X, Huang Y, Su N, Feng J. Research progress on plant water use efficiency and its measuring methods. J Desert Res. 2009;29:648-55.
  23. McCarthy HR, Pataki DE, Jenerette GD. Plant water-use efficiency as a metric of urban ecosystem services. Ecol Appl. 2011;21:3115-27. https://doi.org/10.1890/11-0048.1
  24. Medlyn BE, De Kauwe MG, Lin YS, Knauer J, Duursma RA, Williams CA, Arneth A, Clement R, Isaac P, Limousin JM. How do leaf and ecosystem measures of water-use efficiency compare? New Phytol. 2017;216:758-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14626
  25. Mouat DA, Lancaster J. Desertification: impact. Encycl Soil Sci. Third Edition. CRC Press; 2017. p. 628-32.
  26. Mu Q, Heinsch FA, Zhao M, Running SW. Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data. Remote Sens Environ. 2007;111:519-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.04.015
  27. Mu Q, Zhao M, Steven W. Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm. Remote Sens Environ. 2011;115:1781-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.019
  28. Niu S, Xing X, Zhang Z, Xia J, Zhou X, Song B, Li L, Wan S. Water-use efficiency in response to climate change: from leaf to ecosystem in a temperate steppe. Glob Chang Biol. 2011;17:1073-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02280.x
  29. Oki T, Kanae S. Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science. 2006;313:1068-72. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1128845
  30. Picotte JJ, Rosenthal D, Rhode JM, Cruzan MB. Plastic responses to temporal variation in moisture availability: consequences for water use efficiency and plant performance. Oecologia. 2007;153:821-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0794-z
  31. Ponton S, Flanagan LB, Alstad KP, Johnson BG, Morgenstern K, Kljun N, Black TA, Barr AG. Comparison of ecosystem water-use efficiency among douglas-fir forest, aspen forest and grassland using eddy covariance and carbon isotope techniques. Glob Chang Biol. 2006;2(12):294-310
  32. Potts DL, Huxman TE, Cable JM, English NB, Ignace DD, Eilts JA, Mason MJ, Weltzin JF, Williams DG. Antecedent moisture and seasonal precipitation influence the response of canopy-scale carbon and water exchange to rainfall pulses in a semi-arid grassland. New Phytol. 2010;170:849-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01732.x
  33. Reynolds JF, Maestre FT, Kemp PR, Stafford-Smith DM, Lambin E. Natural and human dimensions of land degradation in drylands: causes and consequences. In: Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world. Berlin:Springer; 2007. p. 247-57.
  34. Serrano-Ortiz P, Sanchez-Canete EP, Oyonarte C. The carbon cycle in drylands. In:Lal R, Lorenz K, Huttl RF, Schneider BU, von Braun J, editors. Recarbonization of the biosphere: ecosystems and the global carbon cycle. Dordrecht:Springer Netherlands; 2012. p. 347-68.
  35. Shurpali NJ, Biasi C, Jokinen H, Niina M, Pertti J. Linking water vapor and $CO_2$ exchange from a perennial bioenergy crop on a drained organic soil in eastern Finland. Agric For Meteorol. 2013;168:47-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.08.006
  36. Simioni G, Le Roux X, Gignoux J, Walcroft AS. Leaf gas exchange characteristics and water-and nitrogen-use efficiencies of dominant grass and tree species in a West African savanna. Plant Ecol. 2004;173:233-46. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000029323.74523.80
  37. Sun Y, Piao S, Huang M, Ciais P, Zeng Z, Cheng L, Li X, Zhang X, Mao J, Peng S, Poulter B, Shi X, Wang X, Wang Y, Zeng H. Global patterns and climate drivers of water-use efficiency in terrestrial ecosystems deduced from satellite-based datasets and carbon cycle models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 2015;25:311-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12411
  38. Tallec T, Beziat P, Jarosz N. Crops’ water use efficiencies in temperate climate:comparison of stand, ecosystem and agronomical approaches. Agric For Meteorol. 2013;168:69-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.07.008
  39. Tang X, Ma M, Zhi D, Xu X, Li Y, Huang X, Gu Q, Song L. Remotely monitoring ecosystem water use efficiency of grassland and cropland in China’s arid and semi-arid regions with MODIS data. Remote Sens. 2017;9:616. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9060616
  40. Vicente-Serrano SM, Begueria S, Lopez-Moreno JI. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J Clim. 2010;23:1696-718. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI2909.1
  41. Vicente-Serrano SM, Begueria S, Lorenzo-Lacruz J, Camarero JJ, Lopez-Moreno JI, Azorin-Molina C, Revuelto J, Moran-Tejeda E, Sanchez-Lorenzo A. Performance of drought indices for ecological, agricultural, and hydrological applications. Earth Interact. 2012;16:1-27.
  42. Xiao X, Hollinger D, Aber J, Goltz M, Davidson EA, Zhang Q, Iii BM. Satellite-based modeling of gross primary production in an evergreen needleleaf forest. Remote Sens Environ. 2004;89:519-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.008
  43. Xu H, Li Y. Water-use strategy of three Central Asian desert shrubs and their responses to rain pulse events. Plant Soil. 2006;285:5-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-5108-9
  44. Xu H, Li Y, Xu G, Zou T. Ecophysiological response and morphological adjustment of two Central Asian desert shrubs towards variation in summer precipitation. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30:399-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.001626.x
  45. Yang Y, Guan H, Batelaan O, Mcvicar TR, Long D, Piao S, Liang W, Liu B, Jin Z, Simmons CTJSR. Contrasting responses of water use efficiency to drought across global terrestrial ecosystems. Science Report. 2016;6:23284. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23284
  46. Yang YH, Fang JY, Fay PA, Bell JE, Ji CJ. Rain use efficiency across a precipitation gradient on the Tibetan Plateau. Geophys Res Lett. 2010;37:78-82.
  47. Yu G, Wang Q. Ecophysiology of plant photosynthesis, transpiration and water use. Beijing: Science Press; 2010.
  48. Zhang LX, Zhou DC, Fan JW, Hu ZM. Comparison of four light use efficiency models for estimating terrestrial gross primary production. Ecol Model. 2015;300:30-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.01.001
  49. Zhang Y, Moran MS, Nearing MA, Campos GEP, Huete AR, Buda AR, Bosch DD, Gunter SA, Kitchen SG, Mcnab WH. Extreme precipitation patterns and reductions of terrestrial ecosystem production across biomes. J Geophys Res-Biogeo. 2013;118:148-57. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JG002136
  50. Zhu Q, Jiang H, Peng C, Liu J, Wei X, Fang X, Liu S, Zhou G, Yu S. Evaluating the effects of future climate change and elevated $CO_2$ on the water use efficiency in terrestrial ecosystems of China (EI). Ecol Model. 2011;222:2414-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.09.035
  51. Zhu X. Researches on the dynamics, spatial variability and its underlying mechanisms of Water Use Efficiency in Chinese Terrestrial Ecosystems. Beijing: The University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; 2013.

Cited by

  1. Prediction of Technological Change under Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and Regional Differences: A Case Study of Irrigation Water Use Efficiency Changes in Chinese Provinces vol.11, pp.24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247103
  2. Improved productivity, water yield, and water use efficiency by incorporating switchgrass cultivation and native ecosystems in an integrated biofuel feedstock system vol.13, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12787
  3. Assessment of Different Water Use Efficiency Calculations for Dominant Forage Crops in the Great Lakes Basin vol.11, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080739
  4. The lagged effect and impact of soil moisture drought on terrestrial ecosystem water use efficiency vol.133, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108349
  5. Drought and Subsequent Soil Flooding Affect the Growth and Metabolism of Savoy Cabbage vol.22, pp.24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222413307