References
- Hwang I, Kobayashi J, Kawamoto K. Characterization of products obtained from pyrolysis and steam gasification of wood waste, RDF, and RPF. Waste Manage. 2014;34:402-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.10.009
- Bansal RC, Goyal M. Activated carbon adsorption. CRC Press: Taylor & Francis; 2005. p. 46-51.
- Kadirvelu K, Thamaraiselvi K, Namasivayam C. Removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from an agricultural solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2001;76:63-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00072-9
- Olufemi BA, Otolorin F. Comparative adsorption of crude oil using mango (Mangnifera indica) shell and mango shell activated carbon. Environ. Eng. Res. 2017;22:384-392. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2017.011
- Yahya MA, Al-Qodah Z, Ngah CWZ. Agricultural bio-waste materials as potential sustainable precursors used for activated carbon production: A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2015a;46:218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.051
- Malik R, Ramteke DS, Wate SR. Physico-chemical and surface characterization of adsorbent prepared from groundnut shell by ZnCl2 activation and its ability to adsorb colour. Indian J. Chem. Technol. 2006;13:319-328.
- McDougall GJ. The physical nature and manufacture of activated carbon. J. South. Afr. Inst. Min. Metall. 1991;91:109-120.
- Hjaila K, Baccar R, Sarra M, Gasol CM, Blanquez P. Environmental impact associated with activated carbon preparation from olive-waste cake via life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manage. 2013;130:242-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.061
- Chen R, Li L, Liu Z, et al. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from tobacco stem by chemical activation. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2017;67:713-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2017.1280560
- Yahya MA, Al-Qodah Z, Ngah CWZ, Hashim MA. Preparation and characterization of activated carbon from desiccated coconut residue by potassium hydroxide. Asian J. Chem. 2015b;27:2331-2336. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2015.18804
- Ioannidou O, Zabaniotou A. Agricultural residues as precursors for activated carbon production - A review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2007;11:1966-2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.03.013
- Chung CK. Utilization of discarded tree debris for commercial production of activated carbon. Sejongsi: Ministry of Agriculture. Food and Rural Affairs; 2000. p. 174-185 (in Korean).
- Kim J, Chung C, Min B. A study on development of activated carbons from waste timbers. J. Korean Inst. Resour. Recycl. 2008;17:68-78 (in Korean).
- Seppala J, Hamalainen RP. On the meaning of the distance-to-target weighting method and normalisation in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2001;6:211-218. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979376
- Finnveden G. Valuation methods within LCA - Where are the values? Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1997;2:163-169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978812
- Powell JC, Pearce DW, Craighill AL. Approaches to valuation in LCA impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1997;2:11-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978709
- Park PJ, Tahara K, Jeong IT, Lee KM. Comparison of four methods for integrating environmental and economic aspects in the end-of-life stage of a washing machine. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2006;48:71-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.01.001
- Kim H, Kim K, Park H. Life cycle assessment of the environmental infrastructures in operation phase: Case of an industrial waste incineration plant. Environ. Eng. Res. 2017;22:266-276. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2016.105
- Piao W, Kim Y. Evaluation of monthly environmental loads from municipal wastewater treatment plants operation using life cycle assessment. Environ. Eng. Res. 2016;21:284-290. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2015.124
- Fei F, Wen Z, Huang S, Clercq DD. Mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste: Energy efficiency, environmental impact and economic feasibility analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;178:731-739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.060
- Merrild H, Damgaard A, Christensen TH. Life cycle assessment of waste paper management: The importance of technology data and system boundaries in assessing recycling and incineration. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2008;52:1391-1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.08.004
- M'hamdi AI, Gusca J, Blumberga D, Zerouale A, Kandri NI. Comparative analysis of processed wood waste reuse possibilities after chemical delignification treatment. Energy Procedia 2017;113:289-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.04.068
- Nuss P, Gardner KH, Jambeck JR. Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of construction and demolition (C&D) derived biomass and U.S. Northeast forest residuals gasification for electricity production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013;47:3463-3471. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304312f
- Ripa M, Fiorentino G, Vacca V, Ulgiati S. The relevance of site-specific data in life cycle assessment (LCA). The case of the municipal solid waste management in the metropolitan city of Naples (Italy). J. Clean. Prod. 2017;142:445-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.149
- Rocha MH, Capaz RS, Lora EES, et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) for biofuels in Brazilian conditions: A meta-analysis. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2014;37:435-459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.036
- Alhashimi HA, Aktas CB. Life cycle environmental and economic performance of biochar compared with activated carbon: A meta-analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017;118:13-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.016
- Bayer P, Heuer E, Karl U, Finkel M. Economical and ecological comparison of granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorber refill strategies. Water Res. 2005;39:1719-1728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.02.005
- Kim MH, Song HB, Song Y, Jeong IT, Kim JW. Evaluation of food waste disposal options in terms of global warming and energy recovery: Korea. Int. J. Energ. Environ. Eng. 2013;4:1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-4-1
- Zeng L, Zhu H, Ma Y, Huang J, Li G. Greenhouse gases emissions from solid waste: An analysis of Expo 2010 Shanghai, China. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage. 2014;16:616-622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-014-0280-8
- IPCC. Revised 1996 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Meteorological Office, Bracknell. 1997.
- ISO. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. ISO 14040:2006(E). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. 2006.
- ISO. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Requirement and guidelines. ISO 14044:2006(E) International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. 2006.
- ISO. International Organization for Standardization/TR: Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Examples of application of ISO 14041 to goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. ISO/TR 14049:2000(E). Geneva. 2000.
- Schmidt JH, Holm P, Merrild A, Christensen P. Life cycle assessment of the waste hierarchy - A Danish case study on waste paper. Waste Manage. 2007;27:1519-1530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.09.004
- Lee KM. A weighting method for the Korean Eco-Indicator. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1999;4:161-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979451
- Lindfors LG, Christiansen K, Hoffman L, et al. Nordic guidelines on life cycle assessment. Nordic Council of Ministers. Nord 1995:20, Copenhagen. 1995.
- Seo S, Asce M, Aramaki T, Hwang Y, Hanaki K. Environmental impact of solid waste treatment methods in Korea. J. Environ. Eng. 2004;130:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:1(1)
- Lopes E, Dias A, Arroja L, Capela I. Pereira F. Application of life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp and paper industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2003;11:51-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00005-7
- Ekvall T, Finnveden G. Allocation in ISO 14041 - A critical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2001;9:197-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(00)00052-4
- ISO. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Goal and scope definition and inventory analysis. ISO 14041:1998(E) International Organization for Standardization, Geneva. 1998.
- Gabarrell X, Font M, Vicent T, Caminal G, Sarra M, Blanquez P. A comparative life cycle assessment of two treatment technologies for the Grey Lanaset G textile dye: Biodegradation by Trametes versicolor and granular activated carbon adsorption. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2012;17:613-624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0385-z
- Lee KM, Park PJ. Estimation of the environmental credit for the recycling of granulated blast furnace slag based on LCA. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2005;44:139-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.11.004
- EPA. Guidance on data quality assessment for life cycle inventory data. EPA/600/R-16/096. Washington D.C.; 2016.
- Lee DW, Lee JK, Rhee BS, Ryu SK. Increase of specific surface area of carbon fiber. Korean Chem. Eng. Res. 1989;27:777-783 (in Korean).
- KFS. Korean forest service. Statistical yearbook of forestry. Daejeon; 2017. 47.
- Rigamonti L, Grosso M, Giugliano M. Life cycle assessment of sub-units composing a MSW management system. J. Clean. Prod. 2010;18:1652-1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.06.029
- De Marco I, Iannone R. Production, packaging and preservation of semi-finished apricots: A comparative life cycle assessment study. J. Food Eng. 2017;206:106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.03.009
-
Ingwersen WI, Gausman M, Weisbrod A, et al. Detailed life cycle assessment of
$Bounty^{(R)}$ paper towel operations in the United States. J. Clean. Prod. 2016;131:509-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.149 - Coelho LMG, Lange LC. Applying life cycle assessment to support environmentally sustainable waste management strategies in Brazil. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018;128:438-450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.09.026
- Guinee JB, Heijungs R. A proposal for the definition of resource equivalency factors for use in product life-cycle assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1995;14:917-925. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620140525
- Ecoinvent. The Swiss Centre for Life cycle inventories. Ecoinvent (v3.2), Zurich, Switzerland; 2015.
Cited by
- Synthesis of carbon nanostructures from corn stalk using mechano-thermal method vol.1199, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2019.126976
- Generating Energy and Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data of Activated Carbon Production Using Machine Learning and Kinetic Based Process Simulation vol.8, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06522
- Sustainability assessment of activated carbon from residual biomass used for micropollutant removal at a full-scale wastewater treatment plant vol.15, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8330
- A Review of Intermediate Pyrolysis as a Technology of Biomass Conversion for Coproduction of Biooil and Adsorption Biochar vol.2021, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5533780
- Numerical and experimental investigation on the thermochemical gasification potential of Cocoa pod husk (Theobroma Cacoa) in an open-core gasifier vol.23, pp.5, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02051-w
- Route‐Optimized Synthesis of Bagasse‐Derived Hierarchical Activated Carbon for Maximizing Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) Adsorption Capture Properties vol.6, pp.38, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.202101295
- Biomimetic Wood‐Inspired Batteries: Fabrication, Electrochemical Performance, and Sustainability within a Circular Perspective vol.5, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202100236
- Sustainable Development of Magnetic Chitosan Core-Shell Network for the Removal of Organic Dyes from Aqueous Solutions vol.14, pp.24, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14247701
- Can the addition of biochar improve the performance of biogas digesters operated at 45°C? vol.27, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2020.648