한국융합학회논문지 (Journal of the Korea Convergence Society)

  • 제10권2호
  • /
  • Pages.35-40
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2233-4890(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6353(eISSN)
한국융합학회 (Korea Convergence Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

프로젝트기반 학습과 웹 융합 의사소통 유형별 학습자 상호작용

Project-based Learning and Learner Interaction by Web Convergency Communication Types

  • 신명희 (한남대학교 탈메이지 교양교육대학) ;
  • 최도순 (한남대학교 탈메이지 교양교육대학)
  • 투고 : 2018.11.15
  • 심사 : 2019.02.20
  • 발행 : 2019.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 프로젝트 기반 학습을 통한 학습자의 학업 성취도와 학습자 상호 작용에 대한 효과를 알아보고자했다. 학습자 상호 작용의 경우, 학습의 장(場), 즉 다양한 기술 환경 속에서의 학습자 의사소통 유형에 초점을 두었다. 본 연구는 2018년 3월부터 6월까지 주 3시간 교양영어 수강생 80명을 대상으로 카카오 톡과 LMS (학습 관리 시스템)을 통한 학습자 상호 작용의 효과에 관해 연구하였다. 연구 결과를 살펴보면, 프로젝트 기반 학습과 의사소통 유형에 따른 학습자 상호 작용은 카카오 톡 활용 그룹과 LMS (학습 관리 시스템) 그룹 간에는 유의 한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 1)프로젝트 기반 학습과 의사소통 유형에 따른 학습자 상호 작용, 2) 프로젝트 기반 학습과 의사소통 유형에 따른 학습자 학업 성취도 모두 카카오 토크 활용 그룹의 결과가 유의미하게 나타났다. 디지털 네이티브인 요즘 학생들에게 Kakao talk은 학습활동의 문제 해결 및 소통, 자료의 업로드 및 공유의 가장 좋은 환경이라는 것을 나타내 주는 결과이다.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of learners' academic achievement and learner interaction through project - based learning. In the case of interaction, we focused on the field of learning, that is, the learner's communication style in various technical environments. The subjects of this study were 80 learners who took a 3-hour elective English language learning course at a university in Korea. This study is to investigate the effect of learner interaction through KakaoTalk and LMS (Learning Management System). As a result of the study, it was found that there was a significant difference between learner interaction by project - based learning and communication type and kakao talk utilization group and LMS (Learning Management System) group. 1) The results of the kakao talk utilization group were significant in both the learner interaction and the learner's academic achievement according to the project - based learning and communication type. For current digital native learners, Kakao Talk is the result of the fact that it is the optimal environment for problem solving, communication, and uploading and sharing of educational activities.

키워드

Table 1. Interaction Types

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_35_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. General characteristics of subjects

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_35_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Process of Project-based learning

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_35_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Interaction by the communication types

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_35_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Academic Achievement by Interaction types

OHHGBW_2019_v10n2_35_t0005.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. M. Gultekin (2015). The effects of project-based learning on learning outcomes in the 5th grade social studies course in primary education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 5(2), 548-56. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/1969.6/508
  2. D. Abrahamson (2018). Reinventing discovery learning: a field-wide research program. Instructional Science, 46(1), 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9444-y
  3. R. Kalyoncu & A. Tepecik (2010). An Application of Project-Based Learning in an Urban Project Topic in the Visual Arts Course in 8th Classes of Primary Education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(4), 2409-2430
  4. D. H. Kim (1998). An Evaluation Study on the Planning and Implementing of Project Learning in Elementary School, The Korean Society for Curriculum Studies, 16(20, 297-327.
  5. H. J. Hong. (2002). The Effectiveness of Project Method as A Transformer from Virtual and Indirect Experience to Real and Direct Experience in Knowledge-Based Society. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027880200207
  6. Q. John (2016). Not ‘democratic education’ but ‘democracy and education’: Reconsidering Dewey’s oft misunderstood introduction to the philosophy of education. Educational philosophy and theory, 48(10), 0024.
  7. J. H. Lim, B. N. Lim, S. H. Choi, S. R. Kim (2004). A study on the development of community-based project learning models combined with blended learning approach in K-12 setting. The Korean Society for education technology, 20(3), 103-135.
  8. T. Anderson. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent evelopments and research questions. In M. G. Moore & W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education, 129-144.
  9. McGowan, F. Veronica (2018). An Investigation into Web-Based Presentations of Institutional Online Learning Orientations. Journal of Educators Online, 15(2), 29-35.
  10. Mehmet Firat, Hakan Kilinç, Tevfik Volkan Yuzer (2017). Level of intrinsic motivation of distance education students in e-learning environments. Journal of Computer Assist Learning. 34(1) 19-24
  11. T. Anderson. (2003). Modes of interaction in distance education: Recent evelopments and research questions. In M. G. Moore & amp; W. G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education, 129-144. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
  12. I. Jung, S. Choi, C. Lim, and J. Leem. (2002). In this paper, we propose a new method to improve the performance of a web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 39 (2), 153-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290252934603
  13. A. Veerman, & E. Veldhuis-Diermanse. (2001). Collaborative learning through computer-mediated communication in academic education. Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference (CSCL) 2001, 625-632A.
  14. A. Bandra (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  15. F. Henri (1992). Computer conferencing content analysis. In. A. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative Learning Through Computer Conferencing, NATO ASI series. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  16. L. J. Cho (2004). Effect of learning ability and personality grouping on learners' interaction in web-based learning. Graduate School of Education, Korea National University of Education.