구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제35권4호
  • /
  • Pages.206-213
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

상악 구치에서의 구개측 굴곡파절 발현 비율 연구

A study of incidence of palatal side abfractions in maxillary posterior teeth

  • 송주헌 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 허유리 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이경제 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Song, Joo-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Heo, Yuri (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Gyeong-Je (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 투고 : 2019.09.02
  • 심사 : 2019.09.25
  • 발행 : 2019.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 굴곡파절의 대부분 연구들이 협측에 한정되어있다. 본 연구에서는 상악 구치부에서 구개측 굴곡파절의 빈도 조사를 통해 굴곡파절의 원인을 분석해보고자 한다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 총 3193개의 상악 구치를 대상으로 조사를 진행하였다. 구내 관찰과 모형 관찰, 그리고 모형 스캔을 통해 제작된 가상 모형을 관찰하는 방법으로 조사를 진행하였다. 그 결과를 치아, 연령, 성별, 악궁에 따라 분류하였다. 통계적 유의성의 평가를 위해 Chi-square test를 시행하였다(α = 0.05). 결과:상악 소구치(6.8%)보다 대구치(10.8%)에서 구개측 굴곡파절이 높은 빈도로 관찰되었고, 그중 제1대구치(39.1%)에서 가장 높은 빈도로 관찰되었다. 연령이 증가할수록 구개측 굴곡파절이 높은 빈도로 관찰되었으며 이는 통계적으로 유의성이 있었다(P < 0.05). 구개측 굴곡파절의 빈도는 성별에 따른 차이에서는 통계적으로 유의성이 없었으며(P > 0.05), 악궁에 따른 차이에서는 좌측에서 더 높은 빈도로 나타났고 통계적으로 유의성이 있었다(P < 0.05). 결론: 상악 구치에서 구개측 굴곡파절은 상악 제1대구치에서 높은 빈도로 관찰되었고, 연령의 증가에 따라 증가하는 양상을 보였다. 이와 같은 결과는 굴곡파절의 가장 주된 원인이 교합력임을 의미한다.

Purpose: Most of studies dealing with abfractions are limited to the buccal surfaces of the teeth. In this study, we analyzed the cause for abfraction by investigating the incidence of palatal side abfractions in maxillary posterior teeth. Materials and Methods: We investigated a total of 3193 maxillary posterior teeth by an intraoral examination, model observation, and observation of virtual model fabricated using model scanning. We recorded the results and classified them depending on the type of teeth, age, gender, and side of arches. We also performed Chi-square test to evaluate the statistical significance among the groups (α = 0.05). Results: The incidence of palatal side abfraction of the maxillary molars (10.8%) was higher than the premolars (6.8%), and among them, the incidence of the 1st molars (39.1%) were the highest. The incidence of palatal side abfraction increased with age and was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistical significance in the difference by gender (P > 0.05); in the case of arches, left arch showed higher incidence and it was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Palatal side abfraction in maxillary posterior teeth was frequently observed in the maxillary 1st molars, and the incidence increased with age. This result suggests that the main reason for abfraction is due to occlusal force.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Mjor IA. Pulp-dentin biology in restorative dentistry. Part 5: Clinical management and tissue changes associated with wear and trauma. Quintessence Int 2001;32:771-88.
  2. Wood I, Jawad Z, Paisley C, Brunton P. Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: a literature review. J Dent 2008;36:759-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.06.004
  3. Miller WD. Experiments and observations on the wasting of tooth tissue variously designated as erosion, abrasion, chemical abrasion, denudation, etc. Dent Cosm 1907;49:1-23.
  4. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Possible role of tensile stress in the etiology of cervical erosive lesions of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:374-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90448-7
  5. Grippo JO. Abfractions: a new classification of hard tissue lesions of teeth. J Esthet Dent 1991;3:14-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00799.x
  6. Goel VK, Khera SC, Ralston JL, Chang KH. Stresses at the dentinoenamel junction of human teeth-a finite element investigation. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:451-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90504-P
  7. Chen KK, Miyake K, Terashita M. Cervical strains induced by occlusal loading. J Dent Res 1999;78:474.
  8. Nohl FS, McCabe JF, Walls AWG. The effect of load angle on strains induced in maxillary premolars in vitro. J Dent Res 1999;78:1059.
  9. Dejak B, Mlotkowski A, Romanowicz M. Finite element analysis of mechanism of cervical lesion formation in simulated molars during mastication and parafunction. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:520-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.001
  10. Lee HE, Lin CL, Wang CH, Cheng CH, Chang CH. Stresses at the cervical lesion of maxillary premolar-a finite element investigation. J Dent 2002;30:283-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00020-9
  11. Rees JS. The biomechanics of abfraction. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2006;220:69-80. https://doi.org/10.1243/095441105X69141
  12. Pintado MR, Delong R, Ko CC, Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH. Correlation of noncarious cervical lesion size and occlusal wear in a single adult over a 14-year time span. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:436-43. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.109477
  13. Sawlani K, Lawson NC, Burgess JO, Lemons JE, Kinderknecht KE, Givan DA, Ramp L. Factors influencing the progression of noncarious cervical lesions: a 5-year prospective clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:571-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.021
  14. Brandini DA, Trevisan CL, Panzarini SR, Pedrini D. Clinical evaluation of the association between noncarious cervical lesions and occlusal forces. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60180-2
  15. Antonelli JR, Hottel TL, Brandt R, Scarbecz M, Patel T. The role of occlusal loading in the pathogenesis of non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2013;26:86-92.
  16. Wood ID, Kassir AS, Brunton PA. Effect of lateral excursive movements on the progression of abfraction lesions. Oper Dent 2009;34:273-9. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-100
  17. Estafan A, Furnari PC, Goldstein G, Hittelman EL. In vivo correlation of noncarious cervical lesions and occlusal wear. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:221-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.012
  18. Nascimento MM, Dilbone DA, Pereira PN, Duarte WR, Geraldeli S, Delgado AJ. Abfraction lesions: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment options. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2016;8:79-87.
  19. Shulman EH, Robinson HB. Salivary citrate content and erosion of the teeth. J Dent Res 1948;27:541-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345480270041501
  20. Bergstrom J, Eliasson S. Cervical abrasion in relation to toothbrushing and periodontal health. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:405-11.
  21. Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;22:195-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90107-4
  22. Smith WA, Marchan S, Rafeek RN. The prevalence and severity of non-carious cervical lesions in a group of patients attending a university hospital in Trinidad. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:128-34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01763.x
  23. Nascimento MM, Gordan VV, Qvist V, Bader JD, Rindal DB, Williams OD, Gewartowski D, Fellows JL, Litaker MS, Gilbert GH; Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group. Restoration of noncarious tooth defects by dentists in The Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:1368-75. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0138
  24. Ichim IP, Schmidlin PR, Li Q, Kieser JA, Swain MV. Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions Part II. Restorative material selection to minimise fracture. Dent Mater 2007;23:1562-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.02.002
  25. Rees JS, Hammadeh M, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesion formation in maxillary incisors, canines and premolars: a finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:149-54. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00018.x
  26. Radentz WH, Barnes GP, Cutright DE. A survey of factors possibly associated with cervical abrasion of tooth surfaces. J Periodontol 1976;47:148-54. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1976.47.3.148
  27. Grippo JO, Simring M, Coleman TA. Abfraction, abrasion, biocorrosion, and the enigma of noncarious cervical lesions: a 20-year perspective. J Esthet Restor Dent 2012;24:10-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2011.00487.x
  28. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, Dellavia C, Tartaglia GM. Single tooth bite forces in healthy young adults. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:18-22. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-182X.2003.01179.x
  29. Harvey WL, Hatch RA, Osborne JW. Computerized occlusal analysis: an evaluation of the sensors. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:89-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90056-3
  30. Yaffe A, Ehrlich J. The functional range of tooth contact in lateral gliding movements. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:730-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90373-8
  31. Staninec M, Nalla RK, Hilton JF, Ritchie RO, Watanabe LG, Nonomura G, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. Dentin erosion simulation by cantilever beam fatigue and pH change. J Dent Res 2005;84:371-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400415
  32. Whitehead SA, Wilson NH, Watts DC. Development of noncarious cervical notch lesions in vitro. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:332-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1999.tb00416.x
  33. Sessle BJ. Mastication, swallowing, and related activities. Oral Biol St Louis CV Mosby Co. 1981.p.51-89.