Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX (지적과 국토정보)

LX Spatial Information Research Institute (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Economic Effects of Changes in Spatial Accessibility on Regional Tourism Expenditure Structure

공간적 접근성 변화가 지역관광지출구조에 미치는 경제적 효과 분석

  • Received : 2019.10.02
  • Accepted : 2019.12.07
  • Published : 2019.12.10
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This article analyzed economic effects of changes in spatial accessibility on regional touruism expenditure structure resulting from highway investments on Gangwon province, Korea. The Seemingly Unrelated Regress(SUR) model is applied to analyze the structure of change in tourism expenditure of Gangwon Province, and the competition and complementary relationship of tourist demand were analyzed among 18 counties in Gangwon by Dendrinos-Sonis method. The spatial accessibility has a significant effect on the increase in amount of tourist expenditure, but by 1% increase in the accessibility resulted in a reduction of length of stay -0.18% and travel costs -0.34% by respectively. The most powerful variable for improving the on-site economy is the tourist service establishment, which increases one unit, the amount of tourist expenditure increased by 3.6%. Moreover, the competition and supplemental relationship of tourism demands in Gangwon was decided by the conditions under which traffic flow with passing occurred, such as inland or ocean-typed travel attractions, adjacent or remote regions to the highway. The limitations of this study were not able to use raw data of tourism expenditures before and after the opening the highway due to the restriction of priority data, and further research on the appropriate level of spatial accessibility for the regional economy is needed.

본 연구는 고속도로의 투자로 인한 공간적 접근성 변화가 관광객지출구조 및 지역경제에 미치는 효과를 분석하였다. 분석방법은 SUR(Seemingly Unrelated Regressions)기법을 사용하여 강원도의 관광지출구조의 변화를 분석하고, 관광객 유치를 둘러싼 강원도 18개 시군의 지역간 경쟁 및 보완관계는 덴드리노스-소니스(Dendrinos-Sonis) 모형을 적용하여 확인하였다. 공간적 접근성의 개선은 관광지출액의 증가에 유의미한 효과를 나타내지만, 접근성 1% 상승 시 체재기간 -0.18%, 여행비용은 -0.34%를 각각 감소시켰다. 시군별 관광사업체 1개소가 늘어날 때, 관광지출액은 3.6% 증가하였으며, 이를 통해 관광서비스 공급이 지역경제 개선에 효과적인 수단임이 확인되었다. 강원도 시군 간 관광수요의 경쟁 및 보완관계는 기능상으로 내륙형 혹은 해양형 관광지 여부, 지리적 인접여부, 통과교통 발생 등에 의하여 결정되었다. 강원도는 관광객 유인을 위한 교통기반시설의 지속적 확충과 함께 체재기간 연장을 위한 서비스 공급 및 질적 관리가 필요하며, 지역간 보완관계가 높게 나타나는 강릉, 동해, 속초, 원주 등을 중심으로 관광객 극대화를 위한 지역클러스터 전략 수립이 중요하다고 판단된다. 본 연구의 한계는 우선 자료의 제약으로 고속도로 개통 전후의 실제 관광지출액을 토대로 한 변화를 규명할 수 없었고, 공간적 접근성의 적정 수준에 대한 후속 연구가 필요하고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kwon YH, Kim EJ. 2013. Economic Contribution of Technology Fusion of Cultural Industry. Journal of Korean Regional Science Association. 29(4):37-59.
  2. Kim EJ, Byun TG. 2003. Analysis of Regional Competitive and Complementary Relations with Spatial Interactions of Population in Yeongnam Region. The Korea Spatial Planning Review. 37:35-46.
  3. Nam YS. 2019. Evaluation of locational accessibility to leisure facilities using GIS: Focusing on Jeju city Dong area. Korean Journal of Leisure, Recreation & Park. 43(3):69-80. https://doi.org/10.26446/kjlrp.2019.9.43.3.69
  4. Bae YJ. 2010. Analysis of Economic Impacts of Transportation Investments by Financing Strategies : An Application of a Financial Computable General Equilibrium Model[Thesis]. Seoul National University. p. 28.
  5. Yoon JN, Kim EJ, Park SK. 2003. The Analysis of Interregional Competitive and Complimentary Relations for Korea with GRDP and Employment. Journal of Korea Planning Association. 38(7):163-175.
  6. Lee KW. Choi SM. 2003. An Economic Impact Analysis of Regional Tourism Industry: The Case of Gangwon and Jeju Regions. Korea Culture & Tourism Policy Institute.
  7. Cho SY. 2013. Locational Characteristics of Guest Houses for Foreign Tourists: Case of Mapo-Gu, Seoul. Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers. 2(2):183-197. https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.2.2.5
  8. Chae MO. 1998. Spatial Distribution of Land Prices and Its Determinants in Seoul. Journal of Korea Planning Association. 33(3):95-114.
  9. Alegre J, Pou L. 2006. The Length of Stay in the Demand for Tourism. Tourism Management. 27(6):1343-1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2005.06.012
  10. Bull A. 1991. Economics of Travel and Tourism. Longman Australia Pty Ltd.
  11. Cesario FJ. 1976. Value of Time in Recreation Benefit Studies. Land Economics. 52(1):32-41. https://doi.org/10.2307/3144984
  12. Glaeser EL, Kohlhase JE. 2004. Cities, Regions and the Decline of Transport Costs. Papers in Regional Science. 831:197-228.
  13. Gokovali U, Bahar O, Kozak M. 2007. Determinants of Length of Stay: A Practical Use of Survival Analysis. Tourism Management. 28(3):736-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.05.004
  14. Greene W. 2012. Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall. p. 340-374.
  15. Hansen WG. 1959. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of American Institute of Planners. 25:73-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307
  16. Hawley AH. 1950. Human Ecology; A Theory of Community Structure. The Ronald Press Company.
  17. Holl A. 2006. A Review of the Firm-level Role of Transport Infrastructure with Implications for Transport Project Evaluation. Journal of Planning Literature. 21(1):3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412206288905
  18. Hotelling H. 1947. Letter of June 18, 1947, to Newton B. Durry. Included in the report. The Economics of Public Recreation: An Economic Study of the Monetary. Evaluation of Recreation in the National Parks, 1949. Washington, DC: Land and Recreational Planning Division, National Park Service. Mimeographed.
  19. Ironmonger D, Norman P. 2007. Travel Behaviour of Women, Men and Children: What Changes and What Stays the Same?. 29th Annual Conference on Time Use Research.
  20. Levinson DM, Kumar A. 1994. The Rational Locator: Why Travel Times have Remained Stable. Journal of the American Planning Association. 60(3):319-332. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369408975590
  21. Ma M, Pun-cheng LSC. 2000. The Study of Accessibility Indices in Transportation Planning by Using Geographic Information Systems. URISA Conference Proceeding.
  22. Martellato D, Nijkamp P, Reggiani A. 1998. Measurement and Measures of Network Accessibility: Economic Perspectives. In Button KJ. Nijkamp P. Priemus H. Mijkamp P.(Eds). Transport Networks in Europe: Concepts, Analysis and Policies. Northampton. USA: Edward elgar publishing.
  23. Martin JC, Gutierrez J, Roman C. 2004. Data Envelopment Analysis Index to Measure the Accessibility Impacts of New Infrastructure Investments: The Case of the High-speed Train Corridor Madrid-Barcelona-French Border. Regional Studies. 38(6):697-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/003434042000240987
  24. Milthorpe F. 2007. Consistency in Daily Travel Time-an Empirical Assessment from Sydney Travel Surveys. Proceedings of the 30th Australasian Transport Research Forum.
  25. Sampol CJ, Perez EA. 2000. Tourism Expenditure Determinants in a Cross-Section Data Model. University of Balearic Islands. Spain.
  26. Schafer A, Victor DG. 2000. The Future Mobility of the World Population. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 34(3):171-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00071-8
  27. Smith BA. 1978. Measuring the Value of Urban Amenities. Journal of Urban Economics. 5:370-387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-1190(78)90017-7
  28. Sonis M, Hewings GJD, Guo J. 2000. Regional Competition and Complementarity: Comparative Advantages/disadvantages and Increasing/diminishing Returns in Discrete Relative Spatial Dynamics. In Regional Competition editied by Batey PWJ. Friedrich P. New York: Springer.
  29. Rietveld P, Bruinsma F. 1998. Is Transport Infrastructure Effective?-Transport Infrastructure and Accessibility: Impacts on the Space Economy. Berlin. Germany: Springer.
  30. Sonis M, Hewings GJD. 2009. Tool Kits in Regional Science. Springer. pp. 177-197.
  31. Thrane C. 2002. Jazz Festival Visitors and Their Expenditures: Linking Spending Patterns to Musical interest. Journal of Travel Research. 40(3):281-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287502040003006
  32. Thrane C, Farstad E. 2011. Domestic Tourism Expenditures: The Non-linear Effects of Length of Stay and Travel Party Size. Tourism Management. 32(1):46-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.11.002
  33. Venables AJ. 2007. Evaluating Urban Transport Improvements: Cost-benefit Analysis in the Presence of Agglomeration and Income Taxation. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy. 41(2):173-188.
  34. Vilhelmson B. 2007. The Use of the Car-mobility Dependencies of Urban Everyday Life. In Threats from Car Traffic to the Quality of Urban Life: Problems, Causes and Solutions (p. 143-164). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  35. Wang Y, Rompf P, Severt D, Peerapatdit N. 2006. Examining and Identifying the Determinants of Travel Expenditure Patterns. International Journal of Tourism Research. 8(5):333-346. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.583
  36. Wang L, Fong DKC, Law R, Fang B. 2018. Length of Stay: Its Determinants and Outcomes. Journal of Travel Research. 57(4):472-482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287517700315
  37. Zahavi Y, Ryan J. 1980. The Stability of Travel Components over Time. TRB.