Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회지)

The Korean Institute of Building Construction (한국건축시공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Problems of Applying Design for Safety and Adequacy of Risk Factor Derived at Design Phase

설계단계 설계 안전성 검토 적용의 문제점과 도출 위험요인의 적정성

  • Received : 2019.10.15
  • Accepted : 2019.11.21
  • Published : 2019.12.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

While efforts to reduce safety accidents in the construction industry have been made in a variety of ways, so far they have had minimal effectiveness. For this reason, since 2016 Design for Safety (DfS) has been implemented as an attempt to eliminate the root cause of safety accidents by introducing the consideration of safety at the design stage. The purpose of this study was to derive the adequacy and problems of Design for Safety and to contribute to reducing safety accidents by establishing this system correctly. A questionnaire survey of related engineers and analysis of the Design for Safety report showed that the awareness of Design for Safety among engineers was low, while some of the risk factors derived from the design for safety were less relevant to the design. As such, efforts should be made to reduce the risk factors in the actual design stage so that it can contribute more to the reduction of safety accidents.

건설산업에서 안전사고를 줄이기 위한 노력을 다양한 방법으로 꾸준히 하고 있지만 줄지 않고 있다. 따라서 설계단계에 설계의 안전성 검토를 도입하여 안전사고발생의 근본적 원인을 제거하고자 2016년부터 설계 안전성 검토를 도입하여 시행하고 있다. 본 연구에서 설계 안전성 검토 시행의 적정성과 문제점을 도출하여 제도가 올바르게 정착하여 안전사고를 줄이는데 기여하고자 하였다. 따라서 관련 기술자들에게 설문조사를 하고 설계 안전성 검토 보고서를 분석한 결과 관련 기술자들의 설계의 안전성 검토에 대한 인식률이 낮고, 설계의 안전성 검토에서 도출된 위험요인도 설계 사항이 아닌 항목이 다수인 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 실질적인 설계단계 설계상 위험요인을 줄이는 노력을 하여 안전사고 감소에 좀 더 기여할 수 있도록 하여야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Employment and Labor. 2018 Industrial disaster status analysis. 2018 Dec; Ministry of Employment and Labor. p. 732.
  2. Zhang S, Teizer J, Lee JK, Eastman CM, Venugopal M. Building information modeling (BIM) and safety: automatic safety checking of construction models and schedules. Automation in Construction. 2013 Jan;29:183-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.05.006
  3. Xiaer X, Dib H, Yuan J, Tang Y, Li Q. Design for Safety(DFS) and Building Information Modeling(BIM): A Review. Proceeding of International Conference on Construction and Real Estate Management; 2016 Sep 29-Oct 1; Edmonton, Canada. Reston (VA): American Society of Civil Engineers; 2016. p. 69-80.
  4. Moaveni S, Banihashemi SY, Mojtahedi M. A conceptual model for a safety-based theory of lean construction. Buildings. 2019 Jan;9(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings9010023
  5. Behm M. Linking construction fatalities to the design for construction safety concept. Safety Science. 2005 Oct;43(8):589-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2005.04.002
  6. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport. Manual for Design for Safety in Construction. Korea: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport; 2017. 223 p.
  7. Taiebat M., Ku KH. Tuning up the core of hazard identification: How to improve stimulated thinking for safety in design. Proceedings of 47th ASC Annual International Conference; 2011 April 6-9; University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Omaha (Nebraska): Associated Schools of Construction; 2011. p. 1-9.
  8. Szymberski R. Construction project safety planning. TAPPI Journal. 1997 Nov;80(11):69-74.
  9. Shin WS, Son CB. An awareness analysis on the design for safety of construction project and its improvement measures. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2019 Aug;19(4):351-9. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2019.19.4.351
  10. Shin WS, Son CB. An analysis on the design for safety work performance of owner and designer and its improvement measures. Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2019 Sep;20(5):95-103. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2019.20.5.095