The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies (한국전자거래학회지)

Society for e-Business Studies (한국전자거래학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Priority of 『Personal Information Safety Measure』 Using AHP Method: Focus on the Defferences between Financial Company and Consignee

AHP 기법을 이용한 금융회사 『개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준』 우선순위에 관한 연구: 금융회사 위·수탁자 간 인식 차이를 중심으로

  • KIM, Seyoung (Graduate School of Information Security, Korea University) ;
  • KIM, Inseok (Graduate School of Information Security, Korea University)
  • Received : 2019.08.07
  • Accepted : 2019.09.02
  • Published : 2019.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To survive in the trend of the fourth industrial revolution, companies are putting a lot of attention and effort into personalization services using the latest technologies such as big data, artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things, while entrusting third parties to handle personal information on the grounds of work efficiency, expertise and cost reduction. In such an environment, consignors need to check trustees on a more effective and reasonable basis to ensure personal information safety for trustees. This study used AHP techniques to derive the importance and priority of each item of "Personal Information Safety Assurance Measures" for financial companies and trustees, and objectively compared and analyzed differences in perceptions of importance between financial institutions and trustees. Based on this, the company recognizes the difference between self-inspection of financial institutions and inspection of trustees and presents policy grounds and implications for applying differentiated inspection standards that reflect the weights appropriate for the purpose.

4차 산업혁명시대 흐름 속에서 살아남기 위해 기업들은 빅데이터, 인공지능, 사물인터넷 등 최신 기술을 활용한 개인화 서비스에 많은 관심과 노력을 기울이는 한편, 업무 효율성 및 전문성, 비용 절감 등의 이유로 개인정보 처리를 제3자에게 위탁하고 있다. 이러한 환경에서 위탁자는 수탁자에 대한 개인정보 안전성 확보를 위해 보다 효과적이고 합리적인 기준으로 수탁자를 점검할 필요가 있다. 본 연구는 금융회사와 수탁자를 대상으로 AHP 기법을 이용하여 『개인정보 안전성 확보조치 기준』 항목별 중요도와 우선순위를 도출하고, 금융회사와 수탁자 간의 중요도에 대한 인식 차이를 객관적으로 비교 분석하였다. 이를 바탕으로 금융회사 자체 점검과 수탁자 점검의 차이를 인식하고 목적에 맞는 가중치를 반영한 차별화된 점검기준을 적용할 수 있는 정책적 근거와 시사점을 제시한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Announcement of administrative disposition result of breach of personal information protection law(5th-8th), https://www.mois.go.kr/frt/bbs/type013/commonSelectBoardList.do?bbsId=BBSMSTR_000000000006.
  2. Choi, J. W., "A study on the improvement of management outcomes in the start-up companies using AHP and DEA: focusing on the tenant companies of business incubator center," Kyung Hee University, 2011
  3. Im, D. S., "An Empirical Study on the Impact of Management Level Diagnosis of Consignee's Personal Information Protection on Information Security Performance," Chonnam National University, 2018.
  4. Jang, Y. R., "A study on the protection of personal information Life Cycle phased in personal information Act," Konkuk University, 2012
  5. Kim, Y. H., "A Study on the Relative Importance of the Administrative and Technical Measures for the Personal Information Protection," The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies, Vol, 19, No. 4, pp. 135-150, 2014. https://doi.org/10.7838/jsebs.2014.19.4.135
  6. Lee, Y. J., "A Study on the Improvement and Supervisory Status for Personal Fiduciary Services in Financial Institutions," Korea University, 2014.
  7. Ministry of the Interior and Safety, "2018 Personal Information Protection Status Survey," pp. 154-155, 2019.
  8. Ministry of the Interior and Safety, "Case of personal information inspection and administrative disposal," https://www.privacy.go.kr, pp. 8-9, 2018.
  9. Ministry of the Interior and Safety, "Manual of Personal Information Safety Measure," Ministry of Government Legislation, 2017.
  10. Ministry of the Interior and Safety, "Personal Information Protection Act," Ministry of Government Legislation, 2017.
  11. Saaty, T. L., "Decision Makingwith Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Hierachy Process," Int. j. ServesSciences. Vol. 1. No. 1, pp. 83-98, 2008.
  12. Saaty, T. L., "The Analytic Hierachy Process," New York McGraw-Hill. International, 1980.
  13. Song, K. J., " A Study on Determination of Weight Coefficients of checklists for Privacy Impact Assessment(PIA) by means of the AHP," Dongguk University, 2010.
  14. Yoo, J. K., "A Six-sigma Handbook," Korea Productivity Center, 2009.