DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An analysis of the trends of value research : Focused on mathematical values and mathematics educational values

가치 연구의 동향 분석: 수학적 가치와 수학 교육적 가치를 중심으로

  • Received : 2019.10.14
  • Accepted : 2019.11.23
  • Published : 2019.11.30

Abstract

While research projects and reports on values in mathematics education increased in the international community over the years, little has been known about the topic and research findings in South Korea. The purpose of this study was to analyze the trends of value research in mathematics education focused on the "mathematical values" and "mathematics educational values" as defined by Bishop (1996) through a systematic review of the literature. A total of 66 research papers related to value research were analyzed in terms of the following four areas: research period, projects, target research population, and research method. The results of this study showed that the value research that was carried out was project-driven. There was an increase in both the number of papers published and countries that were studied, which encouraged the continuous expansion of the field. Furthermore, the topic of mathematics educational values was studied more than mathematical values. It was also observed that the survey method, among others, was frequently used to explore mathematics educational values of middle school teachers. Finally, research methods related to the measurement of value were gradually refined over time. Based on these results, this paper describes implications to conduct and advance value research in South Korea in various aspects, including in the field of mathematics education.

최근 국제 수학교육에서 가치(values)를 다루는 프로젝트나 연구물이 증가하고 있으나 우리나라에서는 소개된 것이 많지 않다. 본 연구에서는 Bishop(1996)의 '수학적 가치'와 '수학 교육적 가치'를 중심으로 체계적인 문헌 검토를 통하여 최종 66편의 논문을 선정하였고 연구시기, 프로젝트, 분석 대상, 연구 방법을 기준으로 연구 동향을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Atweh, B. & Seah, W. T. (2008). Theorizing values and their study in mathematics education. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Fremantle, Australia.
  2. Barkatsas, T., Law, H. Y., Wong, N. Y., & Seah, W. T. (2018). Valuing from student's perspectives as a lens to understand mathematics learning: The case of Hong Kong. In B. Rott, G. Torner, J. Peters-Dasdemir, A. Moller, & Safrudiannur (Eds.), Views and beliefs in mathematics education: The role of beliefs in the classroom (pp. 43-53). Cham: Springer.
  3. Barkatsas, T. & Seah, W. (2015). Learners' preferred mathematical task types: The values perspective. In A. Bishop, H. Tan, & T. Barkatsas (Eds.), Diversity in mathematics education (pp. 63-79). Cham: Springer.
  4. Bishop, A. J. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  5. Bishop, A. J. (1996). How should mathematics teaching in modern societies relate to cultural values-Some preliminary questions. In D. Nguyen, T. Pham, C. Comiti, D. R. Green, E. Southwell, & J. Izard (Eds.), Proceedings of 7th Southeast Asian conference on Mathematics Education, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  6. Bishop, A. 1. (1998). Culture, values and assessment in mathematics. In H. S. Park, Y. H. Choe, H. Shin, & S. H. Kim (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI-East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 27-37). Seoul, Korea: Korea Society of Mathematical Education.
  7. Bishop, A. J. (2014). Values in Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 633-636). Dordrecht: Springer.
  8. Bishop, A. J. (2016). What would the mathematics curriculum look like if instead of concepts and techniques, values were the focus? In B. Larvor (Ed.), Mathematical cultures (pp. 181-188). Switzerland: Springer.
  9. Bishop, A. J., Clarke, B. A., Corrigan, D. J., & Gunstone, R. F. (2005). Teachers' preferences and practices regarding values in teaching mathematics and science. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Research, theory and practice. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 153-160). Sydney: MERGA.
  10. Bishop, A. J., Seah, W. T., & Chin, C. (2003). Values in mathematics teaching-The hidden persuaders? In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 717-765). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
  11. Cao, Z., Seah, W., & Bishop, A. (2006). A comparison of mathematical values conveyed in mathematics textbooks in China and Australia. In K. S. L. Frederick, D. G. Klaus, & J. L. Francis (Eds.), Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Tradition: A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West. The 13th ICMI Study (pp. 483-493). New York: Springer.
  12. Carr M. E. (2019). Student and/or teacher valuing in mathematics classrooms: Where are we now, and where should we go? In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education (pp. 25-52). Cham: Springer.
  13. Chan, Y. C. & Wong, N. Y. (2019). Methodological issues in the investigation of values in mathematics. In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education (pp. 197-208). Cham: Springer.
  14. Chin, C. & Lin, F. L. (1999). One mathematics teacher's pedagogical values: Intended, implemented, and self phases. In F. L. Lin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Mathematics Teacher Education (Vol. I, pp. 315-324). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
  15. Chin, C. & Lin, F. L. (2000). Values and values statement emerged in students' preferences on test items: A case study from mathematical induction. Paper presented at the History and Pedagogy of Mathematics 2000 Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.
  16. Clarkson, P. C., Bishop, A. J., FitzSimons, G. E., & Seah, W. T. (2000). Challenges and constraints in researching values. In J. Bana, & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000. Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 188-195). Perth: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
  17. Clarkson, P. C., Bishop, A., FitzSimons, G. E., & Seah, W. T. (2001). Lifelong learning and values: An undervalued legacy of mathematics education? In G. E. FitzSimons, J. O'Donoghue, & D. Coben (Eds.), Adult and lifelong education in mathematics: Papers from the Working Group for Action (WGA) 6, 9th International Congress on Mathematics Education (ICME9) (pp. 37-46). Melbourne: Adults Learing Mathematics and Language Australia
  18. Clarkson P., Bishop A., & Seah W. T. (2010). Mathematics education and student values: The cultivation of mathematical wellbeing. In T. Lovat, R. Toomey, & N. Clement (Eds.), International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing. Dordrecht: Springer.
  19. Clarkson, P., Seah, W. T., & Pang, J. (Eds.). (2019). Values and valuing in mathematics education scanning and scoping the territory. ICME-13 Monographs. Cham: Springer.
  20. Corey, D. L. & Ninomiya, H. (2019). Values of the Japanese mathematics teacher community. In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education (pp. 53-67). Cham: Springer.
  21. Dede, Y. (2006a). Mathematics educational values of college students towards function concept. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(1), 82-102. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75440
  22. Dede, Y. (2006b). Mathematical values conveyed by high school mathematics textbooks. Educational Science: Theory & Practice, 6(1), 118-132.
  23. Dede, Y. (2006c). Values in Turkish middle school mathematics textbooks. Quality and Quantity, 40(3), 331-359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-6133-8
  24. Dede, Y. (2011). Mathematics education values questionnaire for Turkish preservice mathematics teachers: Design, validation, and results. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 603-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9213-8
  25. Dede, Y. (2012). Why is mathematics valuable? A comparison of Turkish and German mathematics teachers. Mathematics Education Bulletin-BOLEMA, 26(44), 1171-1206.
  26. Dede, Y. (2013). The effect of German and Turkish mathematics teachers' teaching experience on mathematics education values: A cross-comparative study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(2), 232-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.714489
  27. Dede, Y. (2014). A comparison of Turkish and German mathematics teachers' values: A gender perspective. Education and Science, 39(171), 180-198.
  28. Dede, Y. (2015). Comparing primary and secondary mathematics teachers' preferences regarding values about mathematics teaching in Turkey and Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education., 13(1), 227-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9483-z
  29. Dede, Y. (2019). Why mathematics is valuable for Turkish, Turkish immigrant and German students? A cross-cultural study. In P. Clarkson, W. Seah, & J. Pang (Eds.), Values and valuing in mathematics education (pp. 143-156). Cham: Springer.
  30. Dollah, M. & Widjaja, W. (2018). Comparing the inculcation of the value of rationalism from the Australia and Malaysia mathematics textbooks. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 9, 261-268.
  31. Durmus, S. & Bicak, B. (2006). A scale for mathematics and mathematical values of pre-service teachers. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on the Teaching of Mathematics (ICTM 3), Istanbul, Turkey.
  32. FitzSimons, G., Seah, W. T., Bishop, A. J., & Clarkson, P. (2000). Conceptions of values and mathematics education held by Australian primary teachers: Preliminary findings from VAMP. In W. S. Horng, & F. L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the HPM 2000 International Conference on History in Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 163-171). Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
  33. FitzSimons, G., Seah, W., Bishop, A. J., & Clarkson, P. (2001). Beyond numeracy: Values in the mathematics classroom. 24th Annual MERGA Conference, Sydney, Australia.
  34. Grootenboer, P. & Marshman, M. (2016). The affective domain, mathematics, and mathematics education. In P. Grootenboer, & M. Marshman (Eds.), Mathematics, affect and learning (pp. 13-33). Singapore: Springer.
  35. Hannula, M. S. (2012). Looking at the third wave from the West: Framing values within a broader scope of affective traits. ZDM, 44(1), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0410-5
  36. Jacobs, G. J. & Jacobs, M. (2016). Values that private school learners associate with mathematics learning. Proceedings of the 2016 ISTE International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 259-269). Limpopo, South Africa.
  37. Jacobs, G. J. & van Reenen, W. (2016). Values that first year engineering students associate with mathematics learning. Proceedings of the 2016 ISTE International Conference on Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 248-258). Limpopo, South Africa.
  38. Jo, H. J. & Kim, I. S. (2016). Analyzing research trend of affective aspects in mathematics in Korea. Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2016.30.1.67
  39. Kadroon, T. & Inprasitha, M. (2013). Professional development of mathematics teachers with lesson study and open approach: The process for changing teachers values about teaching mathematics. Psychology, 4(2), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2013.42014
  40. Kang, M. S. & Lee, C. H. (2016). An analysis of recognition in mathematics learning value of elementary school students and parent. School Mathematics, 18(3), 667-689.
  41. Lee, H. F. & Seah, W. T. (2015). "Math is not for us, not an indigenous thing, you know": Empowering Taiwanese indigenous learners of mathematics through the values approach. In B. Greer (Ed.), Proceedings of the meeting of the Eight International Mathematics Education and Society Conference, Portland, OR.
  42. Leu, Y. C. & Wu, C. J. (2005). Investigation on an elementary teacher's mathematics pedagogical values through her approach to students' errors. In H. L. Chick, & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 249-256). Melbourne: PME.
  43. Lim, C. S. (2010). Using NVivo 8 to explore photo-voice. In J. Lim (Ed.), Proceedings of the international workshop on computer aided qualitative research Asia (pp. 48-59). The Netherlands: Merlien Institute.
  44. Liman, M. A., Salleh, M. J., & Abdullahi, M. (2013). Sociological and mathematics educational values: An intersection of need for effective mathematics instructional contents delivery. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(2), 192-203.
  45. Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
  46. Osterling, L. & Andersson, A. (2013). Measuring immeasurable values. In A. Lindmeier, & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the meeting of the 37th Conference of the International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 17-24). Kiel: PME.
  47. Pang. J., Cho. S., & Seah, W. T. (2016). An investigation of what Korean students valued with regards to mathematics and mathematics Learning: A study with sixth and ninth graders. The Mathematical Education, 55(4), 467-484. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2016.55.4.467
  48. Peng, A. & Nyroos, M. (2012). Values in effective mathematics lessons in Sweden: What do they tell us? The Mathematics Enthusiast, 9(3), 409-430.
  49. Philipp, R. A. (2007). Mathematics teachers' beliefs and affect. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 257-315). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  50. Raths, L. E., Harmin, M., & Simon, S. B. (1987). Selections from values and teaching. In P. F. Carbone (Ed.), Value theory and education (pp. 198-214). Malabar, FL: Kreiger.
  51. Seah, W. T. (2002). The perception of, and interaction with, value differences by immigrant teachers of mathematics in two Australian secondary classrooms. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 189-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860220151087
  52. Seah, W. T. (2011). Effective mathematics learning in two Australian primary classes: Exploring the underlying values. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 4, pp. 129-136). Ankara: PME.
  53. Seah, W. T. (2019). Values in mathematics education: Its conative nature, and how it can be developed. Research in Mathematical Education, 22(2), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmed.2019.22.2.99
  54. Seah, W. T. & Andersson, A. (2015). Valuing diversity in mathematics pedagogy through the volitional nature and alignment of values. In A. Bishop, T. Barkatsas, & H. Tan (Eds.), Diversity in mathematics education: Towards inclusive practices (pp. 187-183). Switzerland: Springer.
  55. Seah, W. T., Baba, T., & Zhang, Q. P. (2017). The WIFI study: Students' valuing of mathematics learning in Hong Kong and Japan. In J. W. Son, T. Watanabe, & J. J. Lo (Eds.), What matters? Research trends in international comparative studies in mathematics education (pp. 333-354). Cham: Springer.
  56. Seah, W. T. & Bishop, A. J. (2000). Values in mathematics textbooks: A view through two Australasian regions. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  57. Seah, W. T., Davis, K. E., & Carr, E. M. (2017). School mathematics education through the eyes of students in Ghana: Extrinsic and intrinsic valuing. Paper Presented at CERME10, Dublin, Ireland.
  58. Seah, W. T. & Peng, A. (2012). What students outside Asia value in effective mathematics lessons: A scoping study. ZDM, 44(1), 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0398-x
  59. Seah, W. T. & Wong, N. Y. (2012). What students value in effective mathematics learning: A 'third wave project' research study. ZDM, 44(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0391-4
  60. Seah, W. T., Zhang, Q., Barkatsas, T., Law, H. Y., & Leu, Y. C. (2014). Mathematics learning in mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan: The values perspective. In C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 5, pp. 145-152). Vancouver: PME.
  61. Sfard, A., Forman, E., & Kieran, C. (2001). Guest editorial learning discourse: Sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1/3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014276102421
  62. Shinno, Y., Kinone, C., & Baba, T. (2014). Exploring 'what Japanese students find important in mathematics learning' based on the third wave project. In C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, P. Liljedahl, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 5, pp. 169-176). Vancouver: PME.
  63. Song, S. H., Pang, J. S., Lim, J. H., Kang, O. G, Kang, H. Y., Kwon, N. Y., ..., Choi, J. Y. (2013). A method of mathematical education research. The Korea society of educational studies in mathematics yearbook 2013. Seoul: Kyungmoonsa.
  64. Swadener, M. & Soedjadi, R. (1988). Values, mathematics education and the task of developing pupils' personalities: An Indonesian perspective. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00751232
  65. Tan-Sisman, G. & Kirez, B. (2017). The mathematical values in the Turkish Middle School Mathematics Applications Course Curriculum. Paper Presented at CERME 10. Dublin, Ireland.
  66. Yazici, E., Peker, M., Ertekin, E., & Dilmac, B. (2011). Is there a relationship between pre-service teachers' mathematical values and their teaching anxieties in mathematics? Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(1), 263-282.
  67. Zan, R., Brown, L., Evans, J., & Hannula, M. S. (2006). Affect in mathematics education: An introduction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9028-2