ETRI Journal

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (한국전자통신연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intelligent robotic walker with actively controlled human interaction

  • Weon, Ihn-Sik (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduated School, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Lee, Soon-Geul (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyung Hee University)
  • Received : 2017.12.19
  • Accepted : 2018.05.14
  • Published : 2018.08.07
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, we developed a robotic walker that actively controls its speed and direction of movement according to the user's gait intention. Sensor fusion between a low-cost light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor and inertia measurement units (IMUs) helps determine the user's gait intention. The LiDAR determines the walking direction by detecting both knees, and the IMUs attached on each foot obtain the angular rate of the gait. The user's gait intention is given as the directional angle and the speed of movement. The two motors in the robotic walker are controlled with these two variables, which represent the user's gait intention. The estimated direction angle is verified by comparison with a Kinect sensor that detects the centroid trajectory of both the user's feet. We validated the robotic walker with an experiment by controlling it using the estimated gait intention.

Keywords

References

  1. K. Sagawa et al., Unrestricted measurement method of threedimensional walking distance utilizing body acceleration and terrestrial magnetism, Int. Conf. Contr. Autom. Syst., Jeju Island, Rep. of Korea, 2001, pp. 707-710.
  2. V. Gabaglio et al., Centralised Kalman filter for augmented GPS pedestrian navigation, ION GPS 2001, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, Sept. 11-14, 2001, pp. 312-318.
  3. A. Sinha et al., Person identification using skeleton information from Kinect, Int. Conf. Adv. Computer-Human Interactions, Nice, France, 2013, pp. 101-108.
  4. Q. Ladetto, On foot navigation: Continuous step calibration using both complementary recursive prediction and adaptive Kalman filtering, Proc. Int. Techn. Meeting Satellite Division Institute Navigation, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, Sept. 19-22, 2000, pp. 1735-1740.
  5. S. H. Shin, MEMS-based personal navigator equipped on the user's body, Int. Techn. Meeting Satellite Division, Long Beach, CA, USA, Sept. 13-16, 2005, pp. 1998-2002.
  6. B. K. Sin, Parallel Gaussian processes for gait and phase analysis, J. KIISE. 42 (2015) no. 6, 748-754. https://doi.org/10.5626/JOK.2015.42.6.748
  7. G. Lee et al., JAIST robotic walker control based on a two-layered Kalman filter, IEEE Int. Conf. Rob. Autom. (ICRA), Shanghai, China, May 9-13, 2011, pp. 3682-3687.
  8. G. Lee et al., Walking intent-based movement control for JAIST active robotic walker, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybernetics: Syst. 44 (2014), no. 5, 665-672. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2013.2270225
  9. J. Pineau et al., Towards robotic assistants in nursing homes: Challenges and results, Robotics Autonomous Syst. 42 (2003), no. 3-4, 271-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00381-0
  10. Motion Capture Camera, 2015, available at http://www.vicon.com.
  11. K. Aminian et al., Level downhill and uphill walking identification using neural networks, Electron. Lett. 29 (1993), no. 17, 1563-1565. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19931042
  12. X. Shao et al., Analyzing pedestrians' walking patterns using single-row laser range scanners, IEEE Int. Conf. Syst. Man Cybern., Taipei, Taiwan, Oct. 8-11, 2006, pp. 1202-1207.
  13. J. Preis et al., Gait recognition with Kinect, Int. Workshop Kinect Pervasive Comput., Newcastle, UK, 2012, pp. P1-P4.
  14. I. S. Won et al., A study of a walking intention based on the 3D area and centroid of lower body using RGB-D, Conf. Korea Soc. Precis. Eng. 2016 (2016), no. 5, 262-263.
  15. A. Mikov et al., A localization system using inertial measurement units from wireless commercial handheld devices, IEEE Int. Conf. Indoor Position. Indoor Navigation (IPIN), Montbeliard, France, Oct. 28-31, 2013, pp. 1-7.
  16. S. Rajagopal, Personal dead reckoning system with shoe mounted inertial sensors, MS. thesis, KTH Electrical Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden, 2008, pp. 1-45.
  17. D. Roetenberg, H. Luinge, P. Slycke, MVN: Full 6DOF human motion tracking using miniature inertial sensors, XSENS Technol. 1 (2013), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1142/S233954781320001X
  18. M. K. Kim, D. H Lee, Research on the development of IMU based foot-ground contact detection (FGCD) algorithm in realtime with considering walking speed, Conf. Korea Soc. Mech. Eng. 2015 (2015), no. 11, 2822-2827.
  19. C. A. Cifuentes et al., Human-robot interaction based on wearable IMU sensor and laser range finder, Rob. Auton. Syst. 62 (2014), no. 10, 1425-1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.06.001
  20. B. K. Santhiranayagam et al., Regression models for estimating gait parameters using inertial sensors, IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Sens. Sens. Netw. Inform Process. (ISSNIP), Adelaide, Australia, Dec. 6-9, 2011, pp. 46-51.
  21. R. Jirawimut et al., A method for dead reckoning parameter correction in pedestrian navigation system, IEEE Instrum. Meas. Technol. Conf., Budapest, Hungary, May 21-23, 2001, pp. 209-215.
  22. S. Y. Cho, Design of a pedestrian navigation system and the error compensation using RHKF filter, Ph.D. dissertation, Kwangwoon University, Seoul, Rep. of Korea, 2004.
  23. R. Harle et al., A survey of indoor inertial positioning systems for pedestrians, IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 15 (2013), no. 3, 1281-1293. https://doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2012.121912.00075
  24. S. Godha et al., Integrated GPS/INS system for pedestrian navigation in a signal degraded environment, Int. Technical Meetings Satellite Division Institute Navigation, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 2006, pp. 2151-2164.
  25. M. S. Lee et al., Evaluation of a pedestrian walking status awareness algorithm for a pedestrian dead reckoning, Int. Techn. Meeting Satellite Division Institute Navigation, Portland, OR, USA, Sept. 21-24, 2010, pp. 2280-2284.
  26. O. Woodman, Pedestrian localisation for indoor environments, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2010.
  27. E. Foxlin, Motion tracking requirements and technologies, Handbook of virtual environment technologies, Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, New Jersey, USA, 2002, p. 182.
  28. J. O. Nilsson et al., Cooperative localization by dual footmounted inertial sensors and inter-agent ranging, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process. 2013 (2013), no. 1, 164:1-164:17.
  29. J. Ballesteros et al., On gait analysis estimation errors using force sensors on a smart rollator, Sensors 16 (2016), no. 11, 1896:1-1986:15.
  30. I. S. Weon et al., Estimation of walking intension using centroid variation of lower body area, J. Korean Soc. Precis. Eng. 34 (2017), no. 5, 323-329. https://doi.org/10.7736/KSPE.2017.34.5.323

Cited by

  1. Gait Optimization Method for Humanoid Robots Based on Parallel Comprehensive Learning Particle Swarm Optimizer Algorithm vol.14, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2020.600885
  2. Evaluation of Physical Interaction during Walker-Assisted Gait with the AGoRA Walker: Strategies Based on Virtual Mechanical Stiffness vol.21, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/s21093242