Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Diagnostic Validity between Laser Fluorescence Devices in Proximal Caries

레이저 형광 원리를 이용한 우식 진단 기기의 구치부 인접면 우식 진단 능력 비교

  • Lee, Changkeun (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Shool of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Daewoo (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Shool of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Jaegon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Shool of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yang, Yeonmi (Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bioscience, Shool of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 이창근 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 이대우 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 김재곤 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 양연미 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Received : 2018.01.10
  • Accepted : 2018.02.23
  • Published : 2018.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the proximal caries detecting ability and identify the optimal cut-off values of two types of laser fluorescence (LF) devices; classic type (DD) and pen type (DDpen). The number of proximal surfaces participated in this study were 164 surfaces in primary dentition and 438 surfaces in permanent dentition. Each tooth surface was sequentially assessed by two types of LF devices, and bitewing radiograph. The radiographs were classified into 3 groups in primary dentition ($pR_0$, $pR_1$, $pR_2$), and 4 groups in permanent dentition ($PR_0$, $PR_1$, $PR_2$, $PR_3$) according to the depth of caries, and used as gold standard. In primary dentition, the area under the curve (AUC) values of DD were 0.851 and 0.890, and those of DDpen were 0.883 and 0.917, respectively in enamel caries and dentin caries. In permanent dentition, the AUC values of DD were 0.762 and 0.886, and those of DDpen were 0.828 and 0.958, respectively in enamel caries and dentin caries. When detecting proximal caries in posterior teeth with LF devices, DDpen is more useful than DD in both primary and permanent dentition. However, in primary dentition, DD can also be useful to detect proximal caries.

이 연구의 목적은 두 가지 형태의 레이저 형광원리를 이용한 우식 진단 기기(DD, DDpen)의 구치부 인접면 우식을 진단 하는 능력을 비교하고, 두 기기의 최적의 절단값을 확인하는 것이다. 이 연구에는 164개의 유구치 인접면과 438개의 영구치 구치부 인접면이 연구 대상에 포함되었다. 각 치면은 순서대로 두 가지 기기를 통한 검사를 시행하였고, 두 기기를 비교할 기준으로서 교익 방사선 사진 촬영을 시행하였다. 방사선 사진 촬영 결과는 우식의 깊이에 따라 유치열 3개의 군($pR_0$, $pR_1$, $pR_2$), 영구치열 4개의 군($PR_0$, $PR_1$, $PR_2$, $PR_3$)으로 분류하였다. 유치열에서 법랑질 우식과 상아질 우식의 AUC 값은 DD가 각각 0.851과 0.890으로 나타났고, DDpen은 각각 0.883과 0.917로 나타났다. 영구치열에서 법랑질 우식과 상아질 우식의 AUC 값은 DD가 각각 0.762과 0.886으로 나타났고, DDpen은 각각 0.828과 0.958로 나타났다. 유치열과 영구치열 모두 구치부 인접면 우식을 검사하는 데에는 DDpen이 DD보다 정확한 결과를 보였다. 하지만 유치열에 대해서는 DD도 인접면 우식 검사에 활용이 가능할 것으로 보인다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baelum V, Nyvad B, Grondahl HG, Fejerskov O : Dental caries : the disease and its clinical mangement, 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 173-190, 2015.
  2. Gomez J : Detection and diagnosis of the early caries lesion. BMC Oral Health, 15 Suppl 1:S3, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-15-S1-S3
  3. Schwendicke F, Paris S, Stolpe M : Detection and treatment of proximal caries lesions : Milieu-specific cost-effectiveness analysis. J Dent, 43:647-655, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.009
  4. Virajsilp V, Thearmontree A, Paiboonwarachat D, Aryatawong S : Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser flurescence and bitewing radiography. Pediatr Dent, 27:493-499, 2005.
  5. Bizhang M, Wollenweber N, Zimmer S, et al. : Pen-type laser fluorescence device versus bitewing radiographs for caries detection on approximal surfaces. Head Face Med, 12:30, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-016-0126-9
  6. Menem R, Barngkgei I, Joury E, et al. : The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study. Lasers Med Sci, 32:621-628, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2157-2
  7. Huth KC, Lussi A, Neuhaus KW, et al. : In vivo performance of a laser fluorescence device for the approximal detection of caries in permanent molars. J Dent, 38:1019-1026, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.09.001
  8. Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ : A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent, 62:201-213, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2002.tb03446.x
  9. Banerjee A, Gilmour A, Kidd E, Watson T : Relationship between S.mutans and the autofluorescence of carious dentin. Am J Dent, 17:233-236, 2004.
  10. Lussi A, Hellwig E : Performance of a new laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in vitro. J Dent, 34:467-471, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.11.002
  11. Huth KC, Neuhaus KW, Lussi A, et al. : Clinical performance of a new laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars. J Dent, 36:1033-1040, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2008.08.013
  12. Neuhaus KW, Rodrigues JA, Lussi A, et al. : Performance of laser fluorescence devices, visual and radiographic examination for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars. Clin Oral Investig, 15:635-641, 2010.
  13. Lussi A, Hack A, Stich H, et al. : Detection of approximal caries with a new laser fluorescence device. Caries Res, 40:97-103, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1159/000091054
  14. Chawla N, Messer LB, Adams GG, Manton DJ : An in vitro comparison of detection methods for approximal carious lesions in primary molars. Caries Res, 46:161-169, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1159/000337099
  15. Kidd EAM, Frencken J, Nyvad B, Opdam NJM, et al. : Dental caries : the disease and its clinical mangement, 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 335-373, 2015.
  16. Innes NPT, Schwendicke F : Restorative threshold for carious lesion : systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res, 96:501-508, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517693605
  17. Song SW : Using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to measure sensitivity and specificity. Korean J Fam Med, 30:841-842, 2009. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.2009.30.11.841
  18. Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD : Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic test. Prev Vet Med, 45:23-41, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00115-X
  19. Hintze H, Lussi A, Cuisinier F, Nyvad B : Dental caries : the disease and its clinical mangement, 3rd ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 211-231, 2015.
  20. Moriyama CM, Rodrigues JA, Lussi A, Diniz MB : Effectiveness of fluorescence-based methods to detect in situ demineralization and remineralization on smooth surfaces. Caries Res, 48:507-514, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1159/000363074
  21. Souza JF, Diniz MB, Cordeiro RCL, et al. : In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth. Indian J Dent Res, 25:702-710, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.152165
  22. Florkowski CM : Sensitivity, specificity, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and likelihood ratios : communicating the performance of diagnostic tests. Clin Biochem Rev, 29 Suppl1:S83-87, 2008.
  23. Nokhbatolfoghahaie H, Alikhasi M, Yaqhoub ZB, et al. : Evaluation of Accuracy of DIAGNOdent in diagnosis of primary and secondary caries in comparison to conventional methods. J Laser Med Sci, 4:159-167, 2013.
  24. Newman B, Seow WK, Holcombe T, et al. : Clinical detection of caries in the primary dentition with and without bitewing radiography. Aust Dent J, 54:23-30, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.01084.x
  25. Schwendicke F, Tzschoppe M, Paris S : Radiographic caries detection : A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent, 43:924-933, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.02.009
  26. Zandona AF, Zero DT : Diagnostic tools for early caries detection. J Am Dent Assoc, 137:1675-1684, 2006. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0113