References
-
Bernhardt R, Kuhlisch E, Schulz MC, Eckelt U, Stadlinger B. Comparison of bone-implant contact and bone-implant volume between 2D-histological sections and 3D-
$SR{\mu}CT$ slices. Eur Cell Mater 2012;23:237-47. https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v023a18 - Bissinger O, Probst FA, Wolff KD, Jeschke A, Weitz J, Deppe H, et al. Comparative 3D micro-CT and 2D histomorphometry analysis of dental implant osseointegration in the maxilla of minipigs. J Clin Periodontol 2017;44:418-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12693
- Jimbo R, Coelho PG, Vandeweghe S, Schwartz-Filho HO, Hayashi M, Ono D, et al. Histological and three-dimensional evaluation of osseointegration to nanostructured calcium phosphate-coated implants. Acta Biomater 2011;7:4229-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.07.017
- Vandeweghe S, Coelho PG, Vanhove C, Wennerberg A, Jimbo R. Utilizing micro-computed tomography to evaluate bone structure surrounding dental implants: a comparison with histomorphometry. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013;101:1259-66. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32938
- Becker K, Stauber M, Schwarz F, Beissbarth T. Automated 3D-2D registration of X-ray microcomputed tomography with histological sections for dental implants in bone using chamfer matching and simulated annealing. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2015;44:62-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2015.04.005
- Bernhardt R, Scharnweber D, Muller B, Thurner P, Schliephake H, Wyss P, et al. Comparison of microfocus- and synchrotron X-ray tomography for the analysis of osteointegration around Ti6Al4V implants. Eur Cell Mater 2004;7:42-51. https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v007a05
- Park YS, Yi KY, Lee IS, Jung YC. Correlation between microtomography and histomorphometry for assessment of implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:156-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01083.x
- Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004;24:1679-91. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.246045065
- Li JY, Pow EH, Zheng LW, Ma L, Kwong DL, Cheung LK. Quantitative analysis of titanium-induced artifacts and correlated factors during micro-CT scanning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:506-10.
- Narra N, Antalainen AK, Zipprich H, Sandor GK, Wolff J. Microcomputed tomography-based assessment of retrieved dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:308-14. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3756
- Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012;20:256-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2012.02.010
- Salmon P. Micro-CT image analysis techniques for orthopedic applications: metal implant-to-bone contact surface and porosity of biomaterials. In: Leung KS, Qin L, Cheung WH, editors. A practical manual for musculoskeletal research. Singapore: World Scientific; 2008. p.583-603.
- Rebaudi A, Koller B, Laib A, Trisi P. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of the peri-implant bone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:316-25.
Cited by
- Inaccuracy of buccal bone thickness estimation on cone‐beam CT due to implant blooming: An ex‐vivo study vol.46, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13183
- Ceramic Materials and Technologies Applied to Digital Works in Implant-Supported Restorative Dentistry vol.13, pp.8, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081964
- How image-processing parameters can influence the assessment of dental materials using micro-CT vol.50, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.2.161
- Tibolone, alendronate, and simvastatin enhance implant osseointegration in a preclinical in vivo model vol.31, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13602
- Biomimetic Composite Coatings for Activation of Titanium Implant Surfaces: Methodological Approach and In Vivo Enhanced Osseointegration vol.12, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12111352
- Correlation between two-dimensional micro-CT and histomorphometry for assessment of the implant osseointegration in rabbit tibia model vol.25, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-021-00213-x
- How do imaging protocols affect the assessment of root-end fillings? vol.47, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2022.47.e2