Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety (해양환경안전학회지)

The Korean Society of Marine Environment and safety (해양환경안전학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Bridge Team's Technical Behavior Pattern Appearing in Williamson's Turn

윌리암슨 선회법에 나타난 선교팀의 기술적 행동유형의 분석

  • Yun, Chong-gum (Korea Coast Guard Academy, Graduated school of Mokpo National Maritime University) ;
  • Park, Deuk-Jin (Korea Coast Guard Academy, Graduated school of Mokpo National Maritime University) ;
  • Yim, Jeong-Bin (Division of Navigation Science, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • Received : 2018.07.30
  • Accepted : 2018.10.26
  • Published : 2018.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Human error is an important cause of maritime accidents and the identification of human error is fundamental to maritime-accident preventions. In particular, the pattern of technical behavior taken in the circumstance of bridge teams(navigator & helmsman) provides important information to identify human error. The purpose of this study is to identify and analyze technical behavior pattern of bridge teams using Williamson's turn for rescue of persons overboard. The focus of this study is to build and analyze a cognitive model of the human behavior factors of the bridge teams in the process of implementing the experiments. The experimental environment was constructed using a ship-handling simulator and conducted an experiment on participants from 24 bridge teams. As a result of the experiment, it was able to identify the behavior pattern of the ship's maneuvering and maintain trajectory using the rudder and engine. This study is expected to correct human error in the bridge teams application to the certification and training of seafarers.

인적오류는 해양사고의 중요한 원인이고, 인적오류의 식별은 해양사고 예방에 근간이 된다. 특히, 선교팀(항해사와 조타수)이 주어진 상황에서 취한 기술적인 행동 패턴은 인적오류 식별에 중요한 정보를 제공한다. 본 연구의 목적은 익수자 구조를 위한 윌리암슨 선회법(Williamson's Turn)을 이용하여 선교팀들의 기술적인 행동 패턴을 식별하고 분석하기 위한 것이다. 이를 위한 본 연구의 핵심은 실험을 실시하는 과정에서 나타난 선교팀의 인적 행동 요인에 대한 인지모델을 구축하고 분석하는 것이다. 실험환경은 선박조종 시뮬레이터를 이용하여 구축하고, 24개 선교팀으로 구성된 참가자들을 대상으로 실험을 진행하였다. 실험결과, 방향타와 기관을 사용한 항적유지와 선박조종에 대한 행동 패턴을 식별할 수 있었다. 본 연구는 선원의 자격 및 훈련에 적용하여 선교팀의 인적오류를 보완하고 보정하는데 기여할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bertel, S., T. Dressel, T. Kohlberg and V. von Jan(2017), Spatial knowledge acquired from pedestrian urban navigation systems, In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, p. 32.
  2. Cacciabue P. C.(1997), A methodology of human factors analysis for system engineering: theory and application, Part A, 27(3), pp. 325-326. https://doi.org/10.1109/3468.568741
  3. Castells Sanabra, M., S. Ordas Jimenez, C. Barahona Fuentes, J. Moncunill Marimon, C. Muyskens, W. Hofman, S. Cross, A. Kondratiev, A. Boran-Keshishyan, A. Popov and S. Skorokhodov(2014), Simulation-based model course to demonstrate seafarers' competence for deck officers' discipline, In Maritime transport VI: 6th International Conference on Maritime Transport: maritime transport '14, pp. 318-331.
  4. Inoue, K.(2013), Theory and Practice of Ship Handling, Kobe university, pp. 25-29.
  5. Itoh, K., T. Yamaguchi, J. P. Hansen and F. R. Nielsen(2001), Risk Analysis of Ship Navigation by Use of Cognitive Simulation, Cognition, Technology & Work 3, pp. 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00011520
  6. Kim, H. T., S. Na and W. H. Ha(2011), A Case Study of Marine accident Investigation and Analysis with focus on Human Error, Journal of the ergonomics society of Korea, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 137-150. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2011.30.1.137
  7. KIMFT(2010), IAMSAR Manual Vol. III 2010, Haein publisher, pp. 350-357.
  8. KMST(2017), Statical Year Book for Maritime Accident, Korean Maritime Safety Tribunals (KMST).
  9. Yun, C. G. and D. B. Kim(2016), The Consideration on Change of ship's trajectory in case-by-case initial response to cognitive Situation by SHS, KINPR, Spring Conference in Busan, pp. 199-201.

Cited by

  1. Simulation Study of the IAMSAR Standard Recovery Maneuvers for the Improvement of Serviceability vol.8, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8060445