한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제38권5호
  • /
  • Pages.611-623
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

중등 예비 화학교사의 해결자·청취자 활동을 통한 지필평가 문항 제작 과정에서 언어적 행동 및 상호작용

Verbal Behaviors and Interactions in Processes of Making Written Test Items Using Paired Think Aloud Problem Solving for Pre-Service Secondary Chemistry Teachers

  • 투고 : 2018.07.04
  • 심사 : 2018.09.03
  • 발행 : 2018.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 중등 예비 화학교사가 해결자 청취자 활동을 통하여 지필평가 문항을 제작하는 과정에서 나타난 해결자와 청취자의 언어적 행동 및 상호작용을 분석하였다. 이를 위하여 2명의 예비교사로 구성된 4개 조의 해결자 청취자 활동을 통한 지필평가 문항 제작 활동을 녹화 후 전사하여 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 10가지 해결자의 언어적 행동 항목 중에서는 PCK 구성 요소 사이의 '통합' 여부와 관계없이 '제작'이 가장 많이 나타났다. 그 다음으로는 '제공', '수정', '동의요청', '질문', '동의', '정당화' 등도 비교적 많았는데, 특히 '질문'의 경우 '비통합'에서 더 많았던 반면, '정당화'의 경우에는 '통합'에서 더 많았다. 8가지 청취자의 언어적 행동 항목 중에서는 '통합' 여부와 관계없이 '지적', '질문', '동의'가 비교적 많았는데, 특히 '비통합'에서는 '질문'과 '동의'가 더 많았고 '통합'에서는 '지적'이 더 많았다. 언어적 상호작용 유형 중에서는 '대칭형'이 '청취자 주도형'이나 '해결자 주도형'보다 더 많았다. 또한 '대칭형'의 경우 '통합'에서 더 많았던 반면, '해결자 주도형'의 경우에는 '비통합'에서 더 많았다. '청취자 주도형'에서는 '통합' 여부에 관계없이 유사하게 나타났다. '대칭형'은 23가지 항목 중에서 '질문-제공'과 '지적-정당화'가 비교적 많았는데, 그 중에서도 '지적-정당화'는 '통합'에서 더 많았고, '질문-제공'은 '비통합'에서 더 많았다. '통합' 여부와 관계없이 '청취자 주도형'의 경우에는 4가지 항목 중에서 '지적-수정'이 가장 많았고, '해결자 주도형'에서는 3가지 항목 중에서 '제작-동의'가 가장 많았다. 3가지 상호작용 유형에 대하여 다른 항목의 경우에는 매우 적게 나타났다.

This study investigated verbal behaviors and interactions in the processes of making written test items using paired think aloud problem solving for pre-service secondary chemistry teachers. The processes of making written test items using paired think-aloud problem solving in four small groups consisting of two pre-service chemistry teachers were recorded and transcribed. The analysis of the results revealed that 'item making' for ten subcategories for solver's verbal behaviors were most frequently exhibited regardless of 'integration' among the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). The solver's 'provide', 'modify', 'require agreement', 'ask', 'agree', and 'justify' were also frequently exhibited although fewer than 'item making'. Especially, the solver's 'ask' was more frequently used in 'non-integration', whereas 'justify' was more frequently used in 'integration'. In listener's verbal behaviors consisted of eight subcategories, 'point out', 'ask', and 'agree' were frequently exhibited regardless of 'integration'. Listener's 'ask' and 'agree' were exhibited more in 'non-integration', whereas 'point out' was exhibited more in 'integration'. Many verbal interactions were analyzed to be in 'symmetrical type' more than 'solver-dominant type' or 'listener-dominant type'. 'Symmetrical type' was also more frequently exhibited in 'integration', whereas 'solver-dominant type' was more frequently exhibited in 'non-integration'. There were little differences between 'integration' and 'non-integration' in 'listener-dominant type'. In 23 subcategories of 'symmetrical type', 'ask-provide' and 'point out-justify' were most frequently found. Especially, 'ask-provide' was more frequently found in 'non-integration', whereas 'point out-justify' was more frequently found in 'integration'. 'Point out-modify' was the most frequent in 4 subcategories of 'listener-dominant type', while 'item making-agree' in three subcategories of 'solver-dominant type' regardless of 'integration'. However, only a little of other subcategories of the three types were found.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abell, S. K., & Siegel, M. A. (2011). Assessment literacy: What science teachers need to know and be able to do. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 205-221). London, UK: Springer.
  2. Atjonen, P. (2014). Teachers' views of their assessment practice. The Curriculum Journal, 25(2), 238-259. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2013.874952
  3. Aydin, S., & Boz, Y. (2013). The nature of integration among PCK components: A case study of two experienced chemistry teachers. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(4), 615-624. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00095H
  4. Aydin, S., Demirdogen, B., Akin, F. N., & Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E. (2015). The nature and development of interaction among components of pedagogical content knowledge in practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.10.008
  5. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170408600105
  6. Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x
  7. Choi, H. S., & Kim, J. B. (2013). A study on performance level of pre-service physics teachers in constructing questions for classroom assessment - Focused on analysis of multiple choice question about physics conceptest for formative assessment. Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 458-475. https://doi.org/10.21796/jse.2013.37.3.458
  8. Choi, J.-I., & Paik, S.-H. (2016). An analysis of content validity of behavioral domain of descriptive tests and factors that affect content validity: Focus on the fifth and sixth grade science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(1), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.1.0087
  9. Falk, A. (2012). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96(2), 265-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20473
  10. Jang, S.-M., & Kim, J.-Y. (2002). Analysis on the status of performance assessment in science based on the elementary teachers' concerns. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 227-240.
  11. Joo, Y., Kim, K., & Noh, T. (2014). A comparison of verbal interaction patterns in science cooperative learning based on grouping by middle school students' collectivism. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 34(3), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.3.0221
  12. Kang, H., & Kang, S. (2015). Analysis of elementary school teachers' self-diagnosis on their competency for assessment in science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 34(2), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2015.34.2.153
  13. Kang, H., Park, J., & Han J. (2017). The Influence of paired think-aloud problem solving on interactions among PCK components considered in the processes of making written test items by pre-service chemistry teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 37(3), 429-440.
  14. Kim, H.-J., Kwack, D.-O., & Sung, M.-W. (2000). An investigation on science teachers' evaluation practices in the secondary schools. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(1), 101-111.
  15. Kim, H. J., & Yoo, J. (2012). An analysis on rater error in holistic scoring for performance assessments of middle school students' science investigation activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(1), 160-181. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.1.160
  16. Kim, K.-M. & Kim, S.-W. (2002). A study on the weight of assessment domains in science education focused on the teacher's view points. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(3), 540-549.
  17. Kim, K., Park, E., Song, M., Sang, K., Kim, S., Kim, H., Shin, J., Seo, J., Lee, C., Kim, J., Kim, K. & Choi, S. (2012). A study on management of standards-based assessment in secondary schools [중등학교의 성취평가제 운영 방안 연구]. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation (CRE 2012-8).
  18. Kim, S. (2002). A study on the teacher's competence for classroom assessment. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 15(1), 151-171.
  19. Kim, S.-W., & Hyun, M.-S. (2005). The study on the recognition of science teachers about the general matters of performance assessment and the appropriate performance assessment methods in middle school science curriculum. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 9(2), 213-232.
  20. Ko, M.-S., Kim, E.-A., Heo, J.-M., & Yang, I.-H. (2013). Elementary school teachers' beliefs of inquiry and practice of science performance assessment. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 6(2), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2013.6.2.124
  21. Kwon, J.-S., Kim, B. K., Choi, B.-S., Kim, H.-N., Paik, S.-H., Yang, I.-H., Kwon, Y.-J., Cha, H., Woo, J.-O., & Jeong, J.-W. (2012). Theories in science education [과학교육론]. Seoul: Kyoyookbook Publication Co.
  22. Lee, E., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. (2014). Exploring the effects of grouping by learning style of gifted-student in science on the verbal interaction. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 58(4), 406-417. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2014.58.4.406
  23. Lee, I., Kim, B.-K., Lee, B., Park, J., Jin, J., Kim, O., Seo, S., Kim, S., Kang, S., Kwon, J., Kim, S.-W., Paik, S.-H., Shin, D.-H., Lee, H., Cho, H.-H., & Cha, H. (2004). An exploratory study of professional standards of Korean secondary school science teacher's assessment of students [과학과 교사의 학생 평가 전문성 신장 모형과 기준] (Research report RRE 2004-5-5). Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  24. McMillan, J. H. (2014). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standards-based instruction (6th Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  25. Min, H. J. (2012). Development of assessment expertise model through analyzing realities of science teacher's student assessment and teacher training. (Doctoral dissertation). Korea National University of Education, Cheongju.
  26. Nam, M., Park, S., Song, M., Kim, K., Kim, S., Cho, I., Lim, W., Lee, K., Oh, S., Kang, M., & Kang, J. (2006). A study on teacher's professional competency in students assessment (III) [교사의 학생평가 전문성 신장 연구(III)] (Research report RRE 2006-5). Seoul: Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.
  27. Noh, T., Kang, H., & Jeon, K. (2003). Verbal interaction in paired think-aloud problem solving: Comparison of the characteristics of small groups based on achievement. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 47(5), 519-529. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2003.47.5.519
  28. Noh, T., Lee, J., Kang, S., & Kang, H. (2015). Secondary school science teachers' actual and preferred types of assessment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 725-733. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.4.0725
  29. Noh, T., Park, J., & Kang, H. (2016). Interactions among PCK components of pre-service secondary chemistry teachers considered in processes of making written test items. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(5), 769-781. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.5.0769
  30. Noh, T., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. (2009). The investigation of elementary school teachers' perceptions toward constructivist science assessment and their relationship with related variables. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 28(3), 352-360.
  31. Park, H. (2016). A survey on the conditions of middle school science evaluation. Teacher Education Research, 55(3), 389-398. https://doi.org/10.15812/ter.55.3.201609.389
  32. Park, H. J., Jeong, D. H., & Choi, W. H. (2011). Science teachers' perceptions of science practices. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(1), 61-77. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2011.31.1.061
  33. Park, S., & Chen, Y.-C. (2012). Mapping out the integration of the components of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Examples from high school biology classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(7), 922-941. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21022
  34. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
  35. Shin, J., Ryu, S., & Yang, I. (2016). Teachers' needs and utilization of science performance assessment in the elementary schools. KNUE Journal of Research in Science Education, 22(2), 18-29.
  36. Siegel, M. A., & Wissehr, C. (2011). Preparing for the plunge: Preservice teachers' assessment literacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(4), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9231-6
  37. Yang, I., Na, J., Lim, S., Lim, J., & Choi, H. (2008). An analysis of elementary schools' science test items by Klopfer' taxonomy of educational objectives: Focusing on the first term of the 5th grade Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(3), 221-232.