Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Methods to Calculate Mixed Weights of the Condition Evaluation of Rock Slope

절리암반비탈면의 상태평가항목에 대한 혼합가중치 산정방법에 관한 연구

  • 변요셉 (한국건설기술연구원 인프라안전연구본부) ;
  • 최정찬 ;
  • 성주현 (한국시설안전공단 시설성능연구소)
  • Received : 2018.06.27
  • Accepted : 2018.10.18
  • Published : 2018.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study proposed the modified weighting values for jointed rock slopes. The studies on deduction of evaluation index and calculation of weighting, development of criteria for evaluation and evaluation models have been conducted through decision making techniques such as the Delphi method and the AHP method by many researchers. Because these decisions making techniques may be less objective, it is necessary to calculate reasonable weighting considering both an objective weighting and a subjective weighting simultaneously. In this study, utilizing the inspection data of jointed rock slopes, an objective weighting that the concept of entropy is applied was calculated. And the subjective weighting values by AHP technique was calculated based on the opinion of experts. And a modified weighting was suggested by combining the two. As a result, it was found that jointed rock slopes have higher weighting in artificial factors and the damage status items. In addition based on the finally suggested weighting (mixed weighting), the revised evaluation criteria could be presented by converting it into the evaluation score (76 points). And it is expected that it could be usefully utilized upon inspections on cutting slopes and safety diagnosis since objective and highly reliable criteria compared to the condition evaluation criteria that are currently used could be presented through the results of the study.

본 연구는 시특법에 따른 비탈면 상태평가에 활용되는 절리암면비탈면의 가중치에 대한 수정안을 제안했다. 일반적으로 평가 항목수정 및 각 항목별 가중치 부여와 항목별 평가 기준에 대한 연구는 Delphi 방법 및 AHP 방법 등 전문가의 경험에 의존하는 의사결정기법으로 결정되어 왔다. 본 연구에서는 보다 합리적인 결과를 얻기 위하여 기존의 주관적인 방법뿐만 아니라 비탈면의 점검 및 진단 데이터를 활용한 통계적 기법을 함께 활용하여 객관적인 가중치를 제시하고자 하였다. 본 연구에서는 절리암반 비탈면의 점검 데이터를 활용하여 엔트로피의 개념을 적용한 객관적인 가중치를 산정하고, AHP 기법에 의한 주관적 가중치는 전문가의 의견을 토대로 산정하였다. 그리고 두 가지를 결합하여 수정가중치가 제안하였으며, 그 결과, 도출된 절리암반 비탈면의 수정 가중치는 인위적 요인과 손상상태 항목들이 높은 가중치를 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 수정된 평가 기준을 향후 비탈면 세부지침 개정 등에 반영되면 보다 합리적인 절리암반 비탈면의 상태안정성 파악이 가능할 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation (2010), Guidelines for Safety Inspection and In-depth Inspection.
  2. Lee, K. I. (2003), Selecting on the preferred alternatives of the MADM problems using the entropy measure, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering(in Korean), 26, 55-61.
  3. Han, P. K., and Kang, B. G. (2009), An impact assessment index for the RFID privacy, Journal of Information Management, 40, 69-86. https://doi.org/10.1633/JIM.2009.40.1.069
  4. Garg, H., Agarwal, N., and Choubey, A. (2015), Entropy based multi-criteria decision making method under fuzzy environment and unknown attribute weights, Global Journal of Technology & Optimization, 6, doi:10.4172/2229-8711.1000182.
  5. Han, S. R., Kang, N. R., and Lee, C. S. (2015), Disaster risk evaluation for urban areas under composite hazard factors, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation(in Korean), 15, 33-43. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.3.33
  6. Liu, Y. C., and Chen, C. S. (2007), A new approach for application of rock mass classification on rock slope stability assessment, Engineering Geology, 89, 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.09.017
  7. Lee, S. S. (2011), A standard to evaluate objective condition of cut-slope with application of AHP technique, Master's thesis(in Korean), Chung-Ang University.
  8. Gao, Y., Bao, N., Zhang, Y., Jiang, L., and Huang, Z. (2011), Research on index system of rock slope safety evaluation for open pit mine, Procedia Engineering, 26, 1692-1697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2355
  9. Huang, Z., Zhao, G., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2012), Safety Evaluation on Slope of Saindak Open-pit Mine, Procedia Engineering, 43, 226-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.039
  10. Choung, Y. C. (2015), Assessment of Preliminary Failure Risk Rating of Highway Slopes, Master's thesis(in Korean), Dong- University.
  11. Shin, C. G., Sung, H. J., and Lee, S. (2008), A Study on Evaluation Model Developement for Investigation Priority Decision for Road Cutting Slopes Using Analytic Hierarchy Process, Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection(in Korean), 12(4), 107-114.
  12. Woo, S. K., Kim, K. J., and Kim, T. H.(2013), The Risk Factor Analysis of Power Line Tunnel Using the AHP Method in Construction Stage, Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection(in Korean), 17(5), 122-129. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2013.17.5.122
  13. Park, K. R., and Chung, J. D. (2017), A Study of Evaluation System of NATM Tunnel using Delphi and AHP, Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection(in Korean), 21(6), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2017.21.6.025
  14. Lee, H. D., Won, J. H., Seong, J. H. (2017), Weighting Value Evaluation of Condition Assessment Item in Reinforced Earth Retaining Walls by Applying Hybrid Weighting Technique, Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection(in Korean), 21(5), 83-93. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2017.21.5.083
  15. Lotfi, F. H., and Fallahnejad, R. (2010), Imprecise Shannon's Entropy and Multi Attribute Decision Making, Entropy, 12(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.3390/e12010053
  16. Jafari, H. (2013), Selecting Appropriate Quayside Equipment for Grain Unloading Using TOPSIS and Entropy Shannon Meth-ods, International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 3(4), 1072-1078.
  17. Lee, G. M., Choi, J. W., and Jun, K. S. (2016), An Approach of Social Vulnerability Assessment to Urban Flood, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation(in Korean), 16(4), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2016.16.4.43
  18. Song, Y. H., and Lee, J. H. (2012), Evaluation method of urban inundation risk using multi criteria decision making method, Journal of KOSHAM, 12(2), 209-214.
  19. Seong, J. H., and Byun, Y. S. (2016), A Study on the Weights of the Condition Evaluation of Rock Slope used in Entropy and AHP Method, Journal of the Korean Society of Safety(in Korean), 31(5), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.5.61
  20. Saaty, T. L. (1977), A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structure, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 234-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  21. Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  22. Cooper, R., Madden, G., Lloyd, A., and Schipp, M. (2006), The Economics of Online Markets and ICT Networks, Physica-Verlag Heidelbeg, New York, 233.
  23. Joo, S., Oh, C., and Hong, S. (2014), Development of Comprehensive Evaluation Index for In-vehicle Warning Information Systems based on Mixed-Weights, The journal of the Korea institute of intelligent transport systems(in Korean), 13(6), 10-24. https://doi.org/10.12815/kits.2014.13.6.010
  24. Jee, D. H., and Kang, K. J. (2000), A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory, Materials and Design, 21, 199-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3069(99)00066-7
  25. Canada, J. R., and Sullivan, W. G. (1989), Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, Prentice-Hall.
  26. Russell, L. B, Hubley, A. M, Palepu, A., and Zumbo, B. D. (2006), Does Weighting Capture What's Important? Revisiting Subjective Importance Weighting with a Quality of Life Measure, Social Indicators Research, 75(1), 141-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-004-2528-5

Cited by

  1. 급경사지 재해위험도 평가 기준 개선 방안 연구 -행정안전부 급경사지 관리시스템 사례를 중심으로- vol.20, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2019.20.9.372