Journal of Internet Computing and Services (인터넷정보학회논문지)

Korean Society for Internet Information (한국인터넷정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding the Entertainment Values in the Online Educational Videos

  • Jeong, Seong Bin (Graduate School of Information, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Justin Jemin (Department of Technology and Business Administration, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kwak, Kyu Tae (Department of Global Culture Industry, Soonchunhyang University)
  • Received : 2018.07.31
  • Accepted : 2018.08.26
  • Published : 2018.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since the inception of the platform business in educational contents, the prominence of the online educational video has flipped the educational environment. Educational contents have been produced on the internet and allowed learners to access more flexible and student-centered. In fact, the number of people watching the educational content online, such as TED talks and YouTube, has increased during the past decade. The ways of delivering the lecture and the course information in online educational videos are totally different from the traditional lectures. In this paper, we aimed to examine and categorize the online educational videos based on the user's engagement and interest in the course contents. For the study, a negative binomial regression analysis was applied to estimate the effects of the attributes of the traditional lectures by comparatively analyzing the educational videos online. Several values are determined as engaging factors in the online educational videos; hybrid production of education and entertainment, shorter duration, and the number of presenters. From the study, we suggests how to produce engaging educational contents which will appeal the attentions from the users. Moreover, the result of the study may use as a guide to the providers making the productive educational videos.

Keywords

References

  1. Abelson. H, "The creation of OpenCourseWare at MIT," Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 2, pp.164-174, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9060-8
  2. Shah. D, "By the numbers: MOOCS in 2017." Class Central's MOOC Report, 18 Jan, 2016. https://www.class-central.com/report/mooc-stats-2017
  3. Romanelli. F, Jeff. C, and Patrick. J, "Should TED talks be teaching us something?," American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78, 6, p.113, 2014. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe786113
  4. Daradoumis. T, Bassi. R, Xhafa. F, and Caballe. S, "A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment," 8th International Conference on P2P, Parallel, Grid, Cloud, and Internet Computing, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1109/3PGCIC.2013.37
  5. Bean. J, "Increasing student retention: Effective programs and practices for reducing the dropout rate," pp.483-485, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1987.11778272
  6. Piccoli. G, Rami. A, and Blake. I, "Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training," MIS quarterly, pp.401-426, 2001. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250989
  7. Flanagin. A, & Miriam. J, "Internet use in the contemporary media environment," Human Communication Research, 27, 1, pp.153-181, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00779.x
  8. Guo. P, Kim. J, and Rubin. R, "How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos," Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556325.2566239
  9. Webster. J, & Hackley. P, "Teaching effectiveness in technology-mediated distance learning," Academy of Management Journal, 40, 6, pp. 1282-1309, 1997. https://doi.org/10.5465/257034
  10. Sun. P, C, et al., "What drives a successful e-learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction," Computers & Education, 50, 4, pp.1183-1202, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007
  11. Swan. K, "Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses," Distance Education, 22, 2, pp.306-331, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
  12. Holt. D, & Thompson. D, "Managing information technology in open and distance higher education," Distance Education, 19, 2, pp.197-222, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791980190203
  13. Ron. O, "Exploring strategies for online teaching and learning," Distance Education, 20, 2, pp.240-254, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791990200205
  14. Mendelsohn. J, &Mckenna. J, "Social sharing research report: How, why, and what content people share online," Chadwick Martin BNaily, 9 July, 2010. http://www.cmbinfo.com/cmbcms/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Social_Sharing_Research_Report_CMB1.pdf
  15. Yang. J, et al., "An automatic multimedia content summarization system for video recommendation," Journal of Education Technology & Society, 12, 1, p.49, 2009. https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.12.1.49
  16. Jiang. Y, Shang. J, and Liu. Y, "Maximizing customer satisfaction through an online recommendation system: A novel associative classification model," Decision Support Systems, 48, 3, pp.470-479, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.06.006
  17. Bewaudoin. C, "Explaning the relationship between internet use and interpersonal trust: Taking into account motivation and information overload," Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 3, pp.550-568, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00410.x
  18. Ho. J, & Tang. R, "Towards an optimal resolution to information overload: An infomediary approach," Proceedings of international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1145/500286.500302
  19. McQuail. D, & Windahl. S, "Communication models for the study of mass communications," Routledge, 2015. Website on content.taylorfrancis.com
  20. Elaine. T, "What motivates the browser?, Exploring the contexts of information behaviour," Taylor Graham Publishing, 1999.
  21. Felice. C, et al., "Information technology and edutainment: Education and entertainment in the age of interactivity," 1999. https://doi.org/10.4018/jdldc.2013010102
  22. Marta. R, L., et al., "Entercation Engaging viewers in education through TV," Computers in Entertainment, 5, 2, p.7, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1145/1279540.1279547
  23. Black., H, G, & Kelley. S, W, "A storytelling perspective on online customer reviews reporting service failure and recovery," Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 26, 2, pp.169-179, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548400902864768
  24. Smoliar. S, & Zhiang. H, "Content based video indexing and retrieval," IEEE multimedia, 1, 2, pp.62-72, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1109/93.311653
  25. Shumeet. B, et al., "Video suggestion and discovery for YouTube: Taking random walks through the view graph," Proceedings of the 17th International conference on World Wide Web ACM, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1145/1367497.1367618
  26. Benlian. A, Titah. R, and Hess. T, "Differential effects of provider recommendations and consumer reviews in e-commerce transactions: An experimental study," Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 1, pp.237-272, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222290107
  27. Ulrich. S, "Topic interest, text representation, and quality of experience," Contemporary educational psychology, 21, 1, pp.3-18, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1996.0002
  28. Liu. H, et al., "A new user similarity model to improve the accuracy of collaborative filtering," Knowledge-based Systems 56, pp.156-166, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.11.006
  29. Arbaugh. B, "Managing the online classroom: A study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based MBA courses," The Journal of High Technology Management REsearch, 13, 2, pp.203-223, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(02)00049-4
  30. Kauffman. J, et al., "Diverse knowledge and skills require a diversity of instructional groups: A position statement," Remedial and Special Education, 26, 1, pp.2-6, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325050260010101
  31. Cole. D, & Hannafin. M, "An analysis of why students select introductory high school computer coursework," Educational Technology, 23, 4, pp.26-29, 1983. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44426686
  32. Cheng. J, "An exploratory story of emotional affordance of a massive open online course," European Journal of Open, Distance and e-learning, 17, 1, pp.43-45, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0003
  33. Dobele. A, et al., "Why pass on viral messages? Becuase they connect emotionally," Business Horizons, 50, 4, pp.291-304, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2007.01.004
  34. Vansteenkiste. M, et la., "Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts," Journal of personality and social psychology, 87, 2, p.246, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246
  35. Vallerand. R, & Blssonnette. R, "Intrinsic, extrinsic, and a motivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study," Journal of personality, 60, 3, pp.599-6230, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x
  36. Liang. T, Lai. H, and Ku. Y, "Personalized content recommendation and user satisfaction: Theoretical synthesis and empirical findings," Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 3, pp.45-70, 2006. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230303
  37. Kjeldsen. J, "Strategies of visual argumentation in slideshow presentations: The role of the visuals in an Al Gore presentation on climate change," Argumentation, 27, 4, pp.425-443, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-013-9296-9
  38. Liu. M, Kang. J, and Mckelrov. E, "Examining learners' perspective of taking a MOOC: Reasons, excitement, and perception of usefulness," Educational Media International, 52, 2, pp.129-146, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2015.1053289
  39. Pablo. M, et al., "Educational game design for online education," Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 6, pp.2530-2540, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.012
  40. Mackness. J, Mak. S, and Williams. R, "The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC," Proceedings of the 7th International conference on Networked Learning, 2010. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/Mackness.html
  41. Schraw. G, Flowerday. T, and Lehman. S, "Increasing situational interest in the classroom," Educational Psychology Review, 13, 3, pp.211-224, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016619705184
  42. Apperson. J, Laws. E, and Scepansky. J, "The impact of presentation graphics on students' experience in the classroom," Computers & Education, 47, 1, pp.116-126, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.09.003
  43. Sadik. A, "Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology integrated approach for engaged student learning," Educational technology research and development, 56, 4, pp. 487-506, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-008-9091-8.