DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Setting of Restoration Priority and Assessment for Mountain Range Fragmented Points in Daegu : Focused on the Ecological Aspect

생태적 측면에서의 대구광역시 산줄기 단절지점 평가 및 복원우선순위 설정

  • Kim, Jin-Hyo (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Ra, Jung-Hwa (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kwon, Oh-Sung (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun-Ju (Division of Urban Planning and Landscape Architecture, Daegu University)
  • 김진효 (경북대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 나정화 (경북대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 권오성 (경북대학교 대학원 조경학과) ;
  • 조현주 (대구대학교 도시조경학부)
  • Received : 2018.07.10
  • Accepted : 2018.09.13
  • Published : 2018.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify the fragmented points of mountain ranges in Daegu metropolitan city using New Sangyeongpyo (Chart of Mountain Ranges), road system map and GIS spatial analysis, and to prioritize the identified fragmented points for restoration based on quantitative assessment. Moreover, this study proposes restoration plans reflecting the assessment results and characteristics of each fragmented point. The results of this study are summarized as follows: First of all, analysis of the distribution of mountain ranges in Daegu metropolitan city showed that jimaek and semaek in Daegu account for 2% of all mountain ranges in the country, implying that the mountain ranges of Daegu do not hold significant ranking on a national level. However, it was found that numerous fragmented points are appearing due to roads. According to the analysis, 35 fragmented points were identified, of which 15 were found to be restorable. In terms of restoration potential and involved risks, assessment results of the 15 fragmented points indicated that 6 points are at Grade I, 3 points are at Grade II and 6 points are at Grade III. Therefore, a methodology of restoring fragmented mountain ranges was proposed through three suggestions of restoration plans that consider the characteristics of each fragmented points. The results of this study are expected to be highly useful as basic data for effective restoration of mountain ranges in connection with mountain range restorations and relevant projects implemented on a national level in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. Cho HJ and Lee EJ. 2015. The Assessment and Restoration Plan for Fragmented Points of Mountain Range in Daejeon. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science 104(4) : 622-631. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2015.104.4.622
  2. Cho HJ.Lee HT.Sagong JH and Ra JH. 2010. Development and Application of an Evaluation Model for Biotope Appraisal in terms of Species and Biotope Preservation. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 13(5) : 59-80. (in Korean with English Summary)
  3. Chungcheongnamdo. 2013. The 1st Regional Survey Plan of Forestland in Chungnam. (in Korean)
  4. Daegu Metropolitan City. 2009. Survey of Natural Environment in Daegu. (in Korean)
  5. Forman, R. T. T. and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley and Sons. New York. pp : 640.
  6. Forman, R. T. T., Speerling, D., Bissonette, JA., Clevenger, AP., Heanue, CD., Jones, JA., Swanson, FJ., Turrentine, T., and Winter, TC. 2002. Road ecology : Science and solution. Washington, D.C. : Island Press. pp. 1-483.
  7. Gyeonggi Research Institute. 2008. The Study on the Conservation of the Hanbuk Mountains in Gyeonggi-Do. pp : 1-123. (in Korean)
  8. Jejudo, 2012, Survey of mountain area in Jeju. (in Korean)
  9. Jeong JH. 2011. Spatial Analysis for the Assessment of Optimum Place of Eco-Bridge. Environmental Impact Assessment 20(5) : 697-703. (in Korean with English Summary)
  10. Jung YS and Kim HS. 2016. The New Classification of Mountains in the Korean Peninsula and the Mountain Associated Influence on Atmospheric Environment. The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society 37(1) : 21-28. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2016.37.1.21
  11. Kim EY.Song WK and Lee DG. 2012. Forest Fragmentation and its impacts : A review. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 15(2) : 149-159. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2012.15.2.149
  12. Kim JH. 2002. Cultural and Geographical Analysis of Sangyoengpyo. Journal of cultural and historical geography 14(3) : 88-92. (in Korean with English Summary)
  13. Kim JK.Cho HJ and Cho KH. 2016. Ecological Status and Improvement Suggestion of a Wildlife Road-Crossing Structure at the Jinmaei-Pass in Incheon, Korea. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 3(3) : 169-176. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2016.3.3.169
  14. Kim KG.Choi JY and Son SG. 2000. A Study on the Wildlife Corridor for Connecting Fragmented Habitat-Focused on Site Selection and Design Methods-. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 28(1) : 78-82. (in Korean with English Summary)
  15. Kim YP.Rhim ES and Kim YJ. 2004. Restructuring mountain systems in Korean peninsula : focusing on mountain range analysis. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements pp : 1-207. (in Korean)
  16. Korean Environment Institute. 2012. Environmental Assessment Guidelines for the Mountain Ridges of Gimaek of Baekdudaegan in Korea. (in Korean)
  17. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. 2004. Restructuring Mountain Systems in Korean Peninsula : Focusing on Mountain Range Analysis. (in Korean)
  18. Kwak DA.Ryu KW.Kwon SD and Kim WK. 2016. A Study on the Improvement of Evaluation Indicators for Adjusting Forestland Classification. Journal of Korean Association of Geograohic Information Studies 19(1) : 12-29. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2016.19.1.012
  19. Lee JY.Rho BH and Lee JW. 2010. Using AHP to analyze the evaluation factors related to wildlife passage management. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 24(6) : 743-771. (in Korean with English Summary)
  20. Lee WS. 2011. The Assessment of Green Environment and Establishment of Planning Direction for the Sustainable Urban Space. Ph.D, Thesis. Kyungpook National University. (in Korean)
  21. Ministry of environment. 2011. Current Status of Installing and Operating Eco-corridor. (in Korean)
  22. Park JH.Yoo HS and Park MY. 2009. A Study on Assessment Items Analysis for Ecocorridors's Area-Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process-. Environmental Impact Assessment 18(5) 301-312. (in Korean with English Summary)
  23. Park JJ.Woo DG.Oh DH and Park JH. 2012. Site Selection of Wildlife Passage for Leopard Cat in Urban Area. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(1) : 92-99. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.1.092
  24. Park SC.Han BH.Park MJ.Yun HD and Kim MJ. 2016. A Study on the Possibility of Utilizing Both Biotope Maps and Land Covre Maps on the Calculation of the Ecological Network Indicator of City Biodiversity Index. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 44(6) : 73-83. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.6.073
  25. Park SJ and Son I. 2005. Discussions on the Distribution and Genesis of Mountain Ranges in the Korean Peninsular (II) : The Proposal of 'Sanjulgi-Jido(Mountain Ridge Map)'. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information 40(3) : 253-273. (in Korean with English Summary)
  26. Park SJ and Son I. 2008. Discussions on the Distribution and Genesis of Mountain Ranges in the Korean Peninsular (III) : Proposing a New Moountain Range Map. Journal of the Korean Association of Geographic Information 43(3) : 276-295. (in Korean with English Summary)
  27. Park ST. 2010. New mountain range system. Seoul : Chosun Magazine. pp : 1-626. (in Korean)
  28. Riess, W. 1986. Konzepte zum biotopverbund im arten-und biotopschuntz programm bayern. Laufener Seminarbeitrag 10 : 102-115.
  29. Seo JY and Lee YJ. 2010. The Study on Damaged Hanbuk Mountain Range in Gyeonggi-Do. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 13(4) : 65-74. (in Korean with English Summary)
  30. Shin SA and Ahn TM. 2008. Approach to the Location of Wildlife Corridors on Highwaysbetween Yang-jae and Pan-gyo ICs of Seoul-Busan Highway, Korea-. The Korea Society for Environmental Restoration and Revegetation Technology 11(2) : 19-27. (in Korean with English Summary)
  31. http://kosis.kr