DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Discussion of Exposure Evaluation Associated with Extremely Low Frequency-magnetic Field in the Case of Portable Hand-held Fans

휴대용 손 선풍기의 극저주파 자기장 발생 수준 평가와 쟁점 고찰

  • Park, Dong-Uk (Department of Environmental Health, Korea National Open University) ;
  • Yi, Seongjin (Asian Citizen's Center for Environment and Health) ;
  • Kim, So-Youn (Department of Environmental Health, Korea National Open University) ;
  • Bae, Seo-Youn (Department of Environmental Health, Korea National Open University) ;
  • Choi, Sangjun (Department of Occupational Health, Daegu Catholic University) ;
  • Kim, Won (Wonjin Institute for Occupational and Environmental Health) ;
  • Min, Sung Hyon (Seoul Singye Elementary School) ;
  • Park, Jihoon (Institute of Health and Environment, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University) ;
  • Ahn, Jongju (Graduate School of Health & Welfare, Dankook University)
  • 박동욱 (한국방송통신대학교 환경보건학과) ;
  • 이성진 (환경보건시민센터) ;
  • 김소연 (한국방송통신대학교 환경보건학과) ;
  • 배서연 (한국방송통신대학교 환경보건학과) ;
  • 최상준 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과) ;
  • 김원 (노동환경건강연구소) ;
  • 민승현 (서울신계초등학교) ;
  • 박지훈 (서울대학교 보건환경연구소) ;
  • 안종주 (단국대학교)
  • Received : 2018.10.01
  • Accepted : 2018.10.20
  • Published : 2018.10.28

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to report the level of extremely low frequency-magnetic field (ELF-MF) emitted by portable hand-held fans (HHF) and to discuss the methodologies for determining the health risk of ELF-MF for HHF products. Method: ELF-MF was monitored at eight locations by distances in the vicinity of HHFs. A total of 13 HHF brands on the market were randomly selected. A portable ELF-MF monitor MDEX II was used to measure the ELF-MF level in the range of 40-800 Hz with a resolution of $0.01{\mu}T$. This study also examined the frequency results of a total of 45 HHF products investigated by the Korean Ministry of Science and ICT (KMSICT). Results: ELF-MF higher than $0.3{\mu}T$ was found to be emitted at a distance of less than 20 cm from 12 HHF. ELF-MF emitted from four products was found to exceed the reference level ($83.3{\mu}T$ based on 60 Hz) recommended by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). KMSIT reported that the principle frequency emitted from the HHFs ranged from 54 Hz to 284 kHz, without the level of LEF-MF. Unscientifically, the KMSICT used the reference level by ICNIRP as the chronic level and concluded that all HHFs are safe with a basis of 1.2-36.0% less than the reference level. Conclusion: The HHF emitted much higher levels of ELF-MF than $0.3-0.4{\mu}T$, which is regarded as the reference level for childhood leukemia. The risk of HHF should be examined in terms of whether they can be used by the general public, including children and pregnant woman.

Keywords

References

  1. Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, Hubmann G, Jandrisovits R, Kern M, et al. EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses. Rev Environ Health. 2016; 31(3): 363-397. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2016-0011
  2. Bates MN. Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and cancer: the epidemiologic evidence. 1991; 95: 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9195147
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. 2013; 102(PT 2): 1-460.
  4. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys. 1998; 74(4): 494-522.
  5. Abdollahzadeh S, Katharine SH, Schenker MB. A model for assessing occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency magnetic fields in fabrication rooms in the semiconductor health study. Am J Ind Med. 1995; 28(6): 723-734. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700280608
  6. Bowman JD, Touchstone JA, Yost MG. A population-based job exposure matrix for power-frequency magnetic fields. J Occup Env Hyg. 2007; 4(9): 715-728. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620701528001
  7. Chung EK, Kim KB, Chung KJ, Lee IS, You KH, Park JS. Occupational exposure of semiconductor workers to ELF magnetic fields. J Korean Soc Occup Env Hyg. 2012; 22(1): 42-51.
  8. Hakansson N, Stenlund C, Gustavsson P, Johansen C, Floderus B. Arc and resistance welding and tumours of the endocrine glands: a Swedish casecontrol study with focus on extremely low frequency magnetic fields. Occup Environ Med. 2005; 62(5): 304-308. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.015479
  9. Jeon IS, Kim HN. Exposure limits of magnetic fields in the high-voltage transmission lines. Korea Environment Institute Report No. KEI-2006-RE-20S. 2006; 1-225. Available from: http://www.kei.re.kr/.
  10. World Health Organization (WHO). Electromagnetic fields and public health: Exposure to extremely low frequency fields. 2007. Available from: http://www. who. int/peh-emf/publications/facts/fs322/en/.
  11. Kaszuba-Zwoinska J, Gremba J, Galdzinska-Calik B, Wojcik-Piotrowicz K,Thor PJ. Electromagnetic field induced biological effects in humans. Europe PMC. 2015; 72(11): 636-641.
  12. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning of Korea. Standards on the human body protection from electomagnetic wave. Public Notice No. 2015-38 (revised). 2015.
  13. Bowman JD, Methner MM, Hazard surveillance for industrial magnetic fields: II. Field characteristics from waveform measurements. Ann Work Expo Health. 2000; 44(8): 615-633.
  14. Matthes R, McKinlay A, Bernhardt J, Vecchia P, Veyret B. Exposure to Static and Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Biological Effects and Health Consequences (0-100 KHz): Review of the Scientific Evidence on Dosimetry, Biological Effects, Epidemiological. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. 2003.
  15. Vecchia P. Assessment of health effects associated with electromagnetic fields by WHO, IARC, and ICNIRP. USRI Radio Sci Bulletin. 2006; 79(3): 30-33.
  16. Rudiger M, Maria F, Rodney C, Adele G, Kari J, Carmela M, et al. Guidelines for limiting exposure to electric fields induced by movement of the human body in a static magnetic field and by timevarying magnetic fields below 1 Hz. Health Phys. 2014; 106(3) :418-425.17. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0b013e31829e5580
  17. Stam R. Comparison of international policies on electromagnetic fields (power frequency and radiofrequency fields). National Insitute for Public Health and the Environment of Netherlands Report. 2017; 3-18.
  18. Bundesinstitut fur Risikobewertung (BfR). Comparison of European policies of low frequency (power frequency for high-voltage power lines) electric and magnetic fields. 2018. Available from: https://www.bfs.de/EN/topics/emf/expansion-grid/protection/limitvalues-europe/limit-values-europe.html/.
  19. World Health Organization (WHO). Extremely low frequency fields environmental health criteria Monograph No. 238. 2007. Available from: http://www.who.int/peh-emf/publications/elf_ehc/en/
  20. Swanson J. Power-frequency EMF Exposure Standards applicable in Europe and elsewhere. 2014.
  21. The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). ICNIRP statement related to the use of security and similar devices utilizing electromagnetic fields. Health Phys. 2004; 87(2): 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-200408000-00007
  22. Shin YJ, Choi HK, Ryu JH. A study on the major issues related to health safety of electric magnetic field. National Radio Research Agency (NPRA) Report. 2016; 1-75.
  23. Gauger, J. Household appliance magnetic field survey. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems 1985; (9): 2435-2444.
  24. Mader D, Peralta S. Residential exposure to 60?Hz magnetic fields from appliances. Bioelectromagnetics 1992; 13(4): 287-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.2250130404