DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Routine double-J stenting for live related donor kidney transplant recipients: It doesn't serve the purpose, but does it serve a better purpose?

  • Kumar, Vikash (Department of Urology, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) ;
  • Punatar, Chirag B (Department of Urology, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) ;
  • Jadhav, Kunal K (Department of Urology, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) ;
  • Kothari, Jatin (Department of Nephrology, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) ;
  • Joshi, Vinod S (Department of Urology, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) ;
  • Sagade, Sharad N (Department of Urology, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre) ;
  • Kamat, Madhav H (Department of Urology, P. D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre)
  • Received : 2018.05.23
  • Accepted : 2018.09.19
  • Published : 2018.11.10

Abstract

Purpose: Despite meticulous techniques, surgical complications continue to be problematic in kidney transplant recipients. Role of routine stenting to reduce complications is controversial. In this study, we compare incidence of early urological complications, lymphoceles, urinary tract infections (UTI) and graft function; with or without double-J stenting. Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent live related donor renal transplantation from February 2014 to February 2016 were included. Transplants prior to February 2015 were without routine stenting; subsequent transplants were with routine stenting. Patients with neurogenic bladder, previously operated bladder and delayed or low urinary output were excluded. Followup was for at least three months. Descriptive statistics was performed for all parameters. Chi square test and Fisher's Exact test were used for qualitative variables. For quantitative variables, Mann-Whitney test was used to test median difference and independent samples t-test for mean difference. The p-value ${\leq}0.05$ was considered significant. Results: We analysed 74 patients (34 stented and 40 non-stented). There was no difference in the incidence of urinary leak, anastomotic obstruction, lymphoceles or UTI (p>0.4 for all comparisons). However, mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at sixth day, 14th day, one month and two months were 76.1 vs. 61.5 (p=0.025), 72.1 vs. 56.6 (p=0.005), 79.4 vs. 63.1 (p=0.002) and 82.0 vs. 63.3 (p=0.001) in the stented versus non-stented groups. Conclusions: Placement of ureteral stent in renal transplant does not significantly affect the incidence of early urinary complications or UTI. However, graft function is significantly better in stented recipients, at least in the short term.

Keywords

References

  1. Kumar A, Verma BS, Srivastava A, Bhandari M, Gupta A, Sharma R. Evaluation of the urological complications of living related renal transplantation at a single center during the last 10 years: impact of the Double-J stent. J Urol 2000;164:657-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67275-8
  2. Rigg KM, Proud G, Ross Taylor RM. Urological complications following renal transplantation. A study of 1016 consecutive transplants from a single centre. Transpl Int 1994;7:120-6.
  3. Duty BD, Conlin MJ, Fuchs EF, Barry JM. The current role of endourologic management of renal transplantation complications. Adv Urol 2013 Aug 19 [Epub]. http://doi.org./10.1155/2013/246520.
  4. Nie ZL, Zhang KQ, Li QS, Jin FS, Zhu FQ, Huo WQ. Treatment of urinary fistula after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 2009;41:1624-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.10.103
  5. Mano R, Golan S, Holland R, Livne PM, Lifshitz DA. Retrograde endoureterotomy for persistent ureterovesical anastomotic strictures in renal transplant kidneys after failed antegrade balloon dilation. Urology 2012;80:255-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.02.030
  6. Dominguez J, Clase CM, Mahalati K, MacDonald AS, McAlister VC, Belitsky P, et al. Is routine ureteric stenting needed in kidney transplantation? A randomized trial. Transplantation 2000;70:597-601. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-200008270-00011
  7. Benoit G, Blanchet P, Eschwege P, Alexandre L, Bensadoun H, Charpentier B. Insertion of a double pigtail ureteral stent for the prevention of urological complications in renal transplantation: a prospective randomized study. J Urol 1996;156:881-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65647-7
  8. Mongha R, Kumar A. Transplant ureter should be stented routinely. Indian J Urol 2010;26:450-3. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.70594
  9. Rajaian S, Kumar S. There is no need to stent the ureterovesical anastomosis in live renal transplants. Indian J Urol 2010;26:454-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.70595
  10. Pleass HC, Clark KR, Rigg KM, Reddy KS, Forsythe JL, Proud G, et al. Urologic complications after renal transplantation: a prospective randomized trial comparing different techniques of ureteric anastomosis and the use of prophylactic ureteric stents. Transplant Proc 1995;27:1091-2.
  11. Bassiri A, Amiransari B, Yazdani M, Sesavar Y, Gol S. Renal transplantation using ureteral stents. Transplant Proc 1995;27:2593-4.
  12. Osman Y, Ali-El-Dein B, Shokeir AA, Kamal M, El-Din AB. Routine insertion of ureteral stent in live-donor renal transplantation: is it worthwhile? Urology 2005;65:867-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.11.050
  13. Giakoustidis D, Diplaris K, Antoniadis N, Papagianis A, Ouzounidis N, Fouzas I, et al. Impact of double-j ureteric stent in kidney transplantation: single-center experience. Transplant Proc 2008;40:3173-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.08.064
  14. Takai K, Aoki A, Suga A, Tollemar J, Wilczek HE, Naito K, et al. Urinary tract infections following renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 1998;30:3140-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-1345(98)00968-3
  15. Tavakoli A, Surange RS, Pearson RC, Parrott NR, Augustine T, Riad HN. Impact of stents on urological complications and health care expenditure in renal transplant recipients: results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Urol 2007;177:2260-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.152
  16. Wilson CH, Rix DA, Manas DM. Routine intraoperative ureteric stenting for kidney transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(6):CD004924.
  17. Kumar A, Kumar R, Bhandari M. Significance of routine JJ stenting in living related renal transplantation: a prospective randomised study. Transplant Proc 1998;30:2995-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-1345(98)00902-6