Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of a History Book Implementing Augmented Reality on Flow of Reading, Interest, and Knowledge Acquisition

증강현실 활용 독서가 역사 독서 몰입, 흥미 및 지식 습득에 미치는 영향

  • Received : 2018.08.14
  • Accepted : 2018.10.20
  • Published : 2018.10.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of an Augmented Reality(AR) implemented book on flow of reading, interest in history, and acquisition of history knowledge. Perceptions of AR infused books were investigated as well. Researchers provided a history book implementing AR and the same book without any AR content respectively to an experiment group(n=15) and a control group(n=15) composed of $3^{rd}$ and $4^{th}$ grade elementary school children. Results indicate that AR implemented reading had a positive effect on the flow of reading and interest in history, but not on acquisition of history knowledge. Also, AR-based contents were attractive to learners due to its amusing characters, sound, realistic visual motions, and vivid three-dimensional effects. Lastly, students preferred amusing interesting characters, lengthier animations and subtitles, and AR that could be seen without holding smart devices for a long while.

본 연구는 증강현실 활용 역사 독서가 초등학생들의 역사 독서 몰입, 역사 흥미 및 역사 지식 습득에 미치는 영향과 증강현실 활용 독서에 대한 인식을 탐색하였다. 연구를 위해 증강현실 콘텐츠가 포함된 역사책과 증강현실 콘텐츠가 제외된 동일 책을 초등학교 3, 4학년생으로 구성된 실험집단(15명)과 통제집단(15명)에게 제공하였다. 실험 후 역사 독서 몰입, 흥미 및 지식수준에 대한 검사를 실시한 결과 증강현실 활용 독서가 역사 독서 몰입과 역사 흥미 향상에 긍정적인 효과가 있었으나, 역사 지식 습득에서는 유의한 차이가 발견되지 않았다. 또한 학습자들은 증강현실을 통해 공부하는 과정이 즐겁고 재미있다고 인식하였으며, 재미와 흥미를 유발하는 캐릭터, 소리, 현실감 있는 모션, 선명한 3D가 나오는 증강현실 콘텐츠를 선호하였다. 학생들이 선호하는 증강현실 콘텐츠는 재미있는 캐릭터, 긴 동영상과 자막, 그리고 오랫동안 스마트기기를 들지 않고 증강현실 영상을 볼 수 있는 형태 등이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Kim. (2015). History and reality of Korean history by general education curriculum in university - Around the time another discourse analysis. Korean Journal of General Education, 9(4), 371-399.
  2. J. Lee. (2001). History education must change. Seoul: Hyean.
  3. H. Ryu. (2005). Place learning in history and memory of the past - An analysis of elementary school students' representation of a historical place. Studies on History Education, 2, 177-219.
  4. K. Noh, H. Jee & S. Lim. (2010). Effect of augmented reality contents based instruction on academic achievement, interest and flow of learning. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 10(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2010.10.2.001
  5. H. J. Suh. (2008). Relationships among presence, learning flow, attitude toward usability, and learning achievement in an augmented reality interactive learning environment. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 14(3), 137-165.
  6. J. Kang. (2017). Application method of cultural heritage contents exhibition combining augmented reality technology. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(5), 137-143. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.5.137
  7. M. J. Kim. (2006). Exploring history with children's trade books. Social Studies Education 45(3), 41-60.
  8. H. Lee, S. Cha & H. Kwon. (2016). Study on the effect of augmented reality contents-based instruction for adult learners on academic achievement, interest and flow. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 16(1), 424-436. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.01.424
  9. J. Y. Son. (2013). A research review on usage and effectiveness of smart learning for students with disabilities in Korea. Special Education Research, 12(3), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.18541/ser.2013.10.12.3.79
  10. Y. H. Hung, C. H. Chen & S. W. Huang. (2017). Applying augmented reality to enhance learning: A study of different teaching materials. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(3), 252-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12173
  11. P. Milgram & F. Kishino. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual display. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 12(12), 1321-1329.
  12. R. Azuma, Y. Baillot. R. Behringer, S. Feiner, S. Julier, M. Billinghurst & H. Kato. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory.
  13. B. Kye & Y. Kim. (2008). Investigation on the relationships among media characteristics, presence, flow, and learning effects in augmented reality based learning. Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 193-224. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.24.4.193
  14. Y. Lee. (2015) Problem of definition on mixed reality and its alternative, and relationship of virtual/augmented reality. Journal of Korea Design Knowledge, 34, 193-202.
  15. G. Lee& S. Lee. (2017). Virtual reality based cultural tourist attractions converging with souvenir. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 7(3), 111-116. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2017.7.3.111
  16. E. Newman. (2017). Top 6 Digital Transformation Trends In Education. Retrieved from, https://www.forbes.com/sites/danielnewman/2017/07/18/top-6-digital-transformation-trends-in-education/#568698602a9a
  17. M. E. Santos, A. Chen, T. Taketomi, G. Yamamoto, J. Miyazaki & H. Kato. (2014). Augmented reality learning experiences: Survey of prototype design and evaluation. IEEE Transactions on learning technologies, 7(1), 38-56. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2013.37
  18. B. E. Shelton. (2003). How augmented reality helps students learn dynamic spatial relationships. Doctorial dissertation. University of Washington, Washington.
  19. M. B. Ibanez, A. Di Serio, D. Villaran & C. D. Kloos. (2014). Experimenting with electromagnetism using augmented reality: Impact on flow, student experience, and educational effectiveness. Computers & Education, 71, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004
  20. J. Lee & C. Lee. (2002). Teaching history using cartoons. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 6(2), 85-101.
  21. M. Csikszentmihalyi. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
  22. B. Lee. (2010). An analysis on the affecting factors, reading disposition of reading flow of elementary and secondary students. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 41(4), 51-72.
  23. I. Suk & E. Kang. (2007). Development and validation of the learning flow scale. Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 121-154. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.23.1.121
  24. M. Csikszentmihalyi. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Collins.
  25. Y. Woo. (2012). The current state and future direction of interest research in academic setting. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26(4), 1179-1199.
  26. J. Kang. (2014). The effects of history centered reading education in school libraries on elementary school students' interest in history. Korea Journal of Reading Education, 2(1-2), 179-200.
  27. G. Norman. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  28. J. Cohen. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  29. A. Woolfolk. (2006). Educational Psychology (11th Ed.). Boston: Allyn Bacon.