Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study of the relationship of Entrepreneurship, Absorptive capacity and Creative product

기업가정신, 흡수역량과 창의성과 간의 관계에 관한 연구

  • Han, Byung-Cheol (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Cho, Yong-Hwa (Consulting School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Song, Chan-sub (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Kim, Eun-Kyeong (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Kyu (Business School, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 한병철 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 조용화 (금오공과대학교 컨설팅대학원) ;
  • 송찬섭 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 김은경 (금오공과대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 이선규 (금오공과대학교 경영학과)
  • Received : 2018.08.20
  • Accepted : 2018.10.20
  • Published : 2018.10.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To improve Organization's creative product by using external knowledge and information. This study suggests the procedure among Entrepreneurship, absorptive capacity(Potential absorptive capacity, Realized absorptive capacity), Creative product. To the empirical analysis of the theoretical relationship, The research model was set up through literature research. method Empirical analysis was conducted using total 487 questionnaires from worker of electronic industry in Kyung-buk region. the results of this study are as followings; First, Entrepreneurship related positively to Creative product. Second, Creative product was affected through process in order of Entrepreneurship, Potential absorptive capacity, Realized absorptive capacity. This results contribute to the improvement of organization's Creativity and the utilization of external knowledge.

본 연구는 조직의 창의적인 성과를 높이고 외부 지식의 활용 능력을 높이기 위한 방안으로 기업가정신과 흡수역량(잠재흡수역량, 실현흡수역량), 창의성과의 관계를 실증 분석하고, 그 효과를 밝히고자 한다. 이러한 변수간의 관계를 밝히기 위해 문헌 연구를 통해 연구모형 및 가설을 설정하였고, 경북지역 전자 산업 종사자를 대상으로 설문조사를 통해 487부의 설문지를 활용하여 실증분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 기업가정신은 창의성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것을 확인하였다. 또한 기업가정신이 잠재흡수역량, 실현흡수역량을 통해 창의성과에 영향을 미치는 절차적인 효과를 확인하였다. 이러한 연구결과는 외부 지식의 활용을 통해 조직 내 창의성과를 제고하는데 가이드라인을 제공할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Zaheer & G. G. Bell. (2005). Benefiting from network position: firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809-825. DOI : 10.1002/smj.482
  2. Malhotra, Gosain & Sawy. (2005). Absorptive Capacity Configurations in Supply Chains: Gearing for Partner-Enabled Market Knowledge Creation. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 145. DOI : 10.2307/25148671
  3. M. A. White & G. D. Bruton. (2010). The management of technology and innovation: A strategic approach. Mason, OH : Cengage Learning.
  4. J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 165-217. DOI : 10.1016/s0742-7301(03)22004-1
  5. P. Drucker. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship. London ; New York : Routledge.
  6. H. Stevenson & D. Gumpert. (1985). The heart of entrepreneurship.
  7. D. Miller. (1983). The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770-791. DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
  8. J. G. Miller & D. P. Slevin. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75-87. DOI : 10.1002/smj.4250100107
  9. S. S. Kim. (2014). Entrepreneurship Successful Creative Executives: Theory and practice, Seoul : Topbooks.
  10. G. T. Lumpkin & G. G. Dess. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. DOI : 10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
  11. J. K. Kim. (1994). Entrepreneurship concept and research approach. Journal of the Korean Management Association, 9, 27-52.
  12. C. W. Lee. (1999). A Study on the Role and Organizational Performance of Organizational Entrepreneurship: Focused on Fundamental Theories of Resources. Ph.D Thesis, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul.
  13. W. M. Cohen & D. A. Levinthal. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128. DOI : 10.2307/2393553
  14. S. A. Zahra & G. George. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. DOI : 10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
  15. G. Szulanski. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 27-43. DOI : 10.1002/smj.4250171105
  16. P. J. Lane & M. Lubatkin. (1998). Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic management journal, 19(5), 461-477. DOI : 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199805)19:5<461::aid-smj953>3.3.co;2-c
  17. M. J. Lee, H. J, Song & S, J, Lee. (2013). A Diagnosis Research on Korea's Official Development Assistance in e-Gov: Focused on Mongolia and Vietnam. Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 16(2), 27-61.
  18. A. C. Boynton, R. W. Zmud & G. C. Jacobs. (1994). The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations. MIS Quarterly, 18(3), 299. DOI : 10.2307/249620
  19. F. A. J. Van den Bosch, H. W. Volberda & M. de Boer. (1999). Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551-568. DOI : 10.1287/orsc.10.5.551
  20. A. K. Gupta, & V. Govindarajan. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic management journal, 21(4), 473-496. DOI : 10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::aid-smj 84>3.0.co;2-i
  21. R. W. Weisberg. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, N.J : John Wiley & Sons.
  22. T. M. Amabile. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376. DOI : 10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
  23. R. W. Woodman, J. E. Sawyer & R. W. Griffin. (1993). Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321. DOI : 10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
  24. A. Cummings & G. R. Oldham. (1997). Enhancing Creativity: Managing Work Contexts for the High Potential Employee. California Management Review, 40(1), 22-38. DOI : 10.2307/41165920
  25. S. A. Zahra. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259-285. DOI : 10.1016/0883-9026(91)90019-a
  26. Y. S. Kim & S. B. Sohn. (2011). The Influence of Entrepreneurship on the Performance of Korean Traditional Medicine Manufacturing and Distribution Industry - Mediating Effect of Knowledge Management Process. Journal of Business Education, 25 (1), 85-113.
  27. S. A. Zahra. (1996). Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 289-321. DOI : 10.1016/0883-9026(95)00128-x
  28. M. Alavi & D. E. Leidner. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS quarterly, 107-136. DOI : 10.2307/3250961
  29. A. Styhre & M. Sundgren. (2005). Managing Creativity in Organizations. New York : Palgrave Macmillan. DOI : 10.1057/9780230505575
  30. C. K. Prahalad & G. Hamel. (1994). Strategy as a field of study: Why search for a new paradigm? Strategic Management Journal, 15(S2), 5-16. DOI : 10.1002/smj.4250151002
  31. J. Hamel & B. Verspagen. (2002). Technology-gaps, innovation-diffusion and transformation: an evolutionary interpretation. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1291-1304. DOI : 10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00064-1
  32. C. E. Shalley. (1995). Effects of Coaction, Expected Evaluation, and Goal Setting on Creativity and Productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 483-503. DOI : 10.5465/256689
  33. A. H. Lassen, F. Gertsen & J. O. Riis. (2006). The Nexus of Corporate Entrepreneurship and Radical Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(4), 359-372. DOI : 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00406.x
  34. K. O'Quin & S. P. Besemer. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2(4), 267-278. DOI : 10.1080/10400418909534323