DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prospective Comparison of Redo Microvascular Decompression and Percutaneous Balloon Compression as Primary Surgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia

  • Chen, Jing-nan (Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University) ;
  • Yu, Wen-hua (Department of Neurosurgery, The First People's Hospital of Hangzhou) ;
  • Du, Hang-gen (Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University) ;
  • Jiang, Li (Department of Neurosurgery, The First People's Hospital of Hangzhou) ;
  • Dong, Xiao-qiao (Department of Neurosurgery, The First People's Hospital of Hangzhou) ;
  • Cao, Jie (Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University)
  • Received : 2017.06.24
  • Accepted : 2017.11.24
  • Published : 2018.11.01

Abstract

Objective : To prospectively compare facial pain outcomes for patients having either a repeat microvascular decompression (MVD) or percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) as their surgery for trigeminal neuralgia (TN) recurrence. Methods : Prospective cohort study of 110 patients with TN recurrence who had either redo MVD (n=68) or PBC (n=42) from July 2010 until September 2016. The mean follow-up was 45.6 months. Results : After redo MVD, 65 patients (95.6%) experienced immediate relief of pain. After PBC, 34 patients (81%) were immediately relieved of their neuralgia. After 1 month, the clinical effect of redo MVD was better than PBC (p<0.01). Patients who had redo MVD more commonly were pain free off medications (93.4% at 1 year, 78.2% at 4 years) compared with the PBC patients (85.1% at 1 year, 59.3% at 4 years). However, mean length of stay was longer (p>0.05). Patients after PBC who occurred developed herpes simplex (35.7%), facial numbness (76.2%), and annoying dysesthesia (21.4%) more frequently compared with patients after redo MVD who occurred developed herpes simplex (14.7%), facial numbness (8.8%), and hypoesthesia (5.9%) (p<0.05). The symptoms recurred respectively in 15 patients (22.1%) and 19 patients (45.2%) after redo MVD and PBC within the entire 6-year follow-up period. Conclusion : For the patients with TN recurrence, redo MVD was a more effective procedure than PBC. The cure rate and immediate relief of pain were better, and the incidence of complications was lower.

Keywords

References

  1. Amador N, Pollock BE : Repeat posterior fossa exploration for patients with persistent or recurrent idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 108 : 916-920, 2008 https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/108/5/0916
  2. Bakker NA, Van Dijk JM, Immenga S, Wagemakers M, Metzemaekers JD : Repeat microvascular decompression for recurrent idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 121 : 936-939, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.7.JNS132667
  3. Barker FG 2nd, Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ, Larkins MV, Jho HD : The longterm outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. New Engl J Med 334 : 1077-1083, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199604253341701
  4. Bergenheim AT, Asplund P, Linderoth B : Percutaneous retrogasserian balloon compression for trigeminal neuralgia: review of critical technical details and outcomes. World Neurosurg 79 : 359-368, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.014
  5. Chen J, Lee S, Lui T, Yeh Y, Chen T, Tzaan W : Teflon granuloma after microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Surg Neurol 53 : 281-287, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-3019(00)00169-5
  6. Chen JF, Tu PH, Lee ST : Repeated percutaneous balloon compression for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia: a long-term study. World Neurosurg 77 : 352-356, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.013
  7. Cho DY, Chang CG, Wang YC, Wang FH, Shen CC, Yang DY : Repeat operations in failed microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 35 : 665-669; discussion 669-670, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199410000-00012
  8. Du Y, Yang D, Dong X, Du Q, Wang H, Yu W : Percutaneous balloon compression (PBC) of trigeminal ganglion for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression (MVD). Ir J Med Sci 184 : 745-751, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1163-7
  9. Gu W, Zhao W : Microvascular decompression for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. J Clin Neurosci 21 : 1549-1553, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.042
  10. Jannetta PJ : Arterial compression of the trigeminal nerve at the pons in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 26 Suppl : 159-162, 1967 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1967.26.1part2.0159
  11. Jannetta PJ : Neurovascular compression in cranial nerve and systemic disease. Ann Surg 192 : 518-525, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198010000-00010
  12. Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ : Management of the failed patient with trigeminal neuralgia. Clin Neurosurg 32 : 334-347, 1985
  13. Jannetta PJ, Tew JM Jr : Treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 4 : 93-94, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-197901000-00019
  14. Kureshi SA, Wilkins RH : Posterior fossa reexploration for persistent or recurrent trigeminal neuralgia or hemifacial spasm: surgical findings and therapeutic implications. Neurosurgery 43 : 1111-1117, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199811000-00061
  15. Lee SH, Levy EI, Scarrow AM, Kassam A, Jannetta PJ : Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia attributable to veins after microvascular decompression. Neurosurgery 46 : 356-361; discussion 361-362, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200002000-00019
  16. Lopez BC, Hamlyn PJ, Zakrzewska JM : Systematic review of ablative neurosurgical techniques for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurgery 54 : 973-982; discussion 982-983, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000114867.98896.F0
  17. Massager N, Lorenzoni J, Devriendt D, Desmedt F, Brotchi J, Levivier M : Gamma knife surgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia performed using a far-anterior cisternal target and a high dose of radiation. J Neurosurg 100 : 597-605, 2004 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2004.100.4.0597
  18. Matsushima T, Yamaguchi T, Inoue TK, Matsukado K, Fukui M : Recurrent trigeminal neuralgia after microvascular decompression using an interposing technique. Teflon felt adhesion and the sling retraction technique. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 142 : 557-561, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007010050469
  19. Meybodi AT, Habibi Z, Miri M, Tabatabaie SA : Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia using the 'Stitched Sling Retraction' technique in recurrent cases after previous microvascular decompression. Acta Neurochir 156 : 1181-1187; discussion 1187, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-014-2092-y
  20. Nanda A, Javalkar V, Zhang S, Ahmed O : Long term efficacy and patient satisfaction of microvascular decompression and gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia. J Clin Neurosci 22 : 818-822, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2014.11.028
  21. Park SS, Lee MK, Kim JW, Jung JY, Kim IS, Ghang CG : Percutaneous balloon compression of trigeminal ganglion for the treatment of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia : experience in 50 patients. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 43 : 186-189, 2008 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2008.43.4.186
  22. Premsagar IC, Moss T, Coakham HB : Teflon-induced granuloma following treatment of trigeminal neuralgia by microvascular decompression. report of two cases. J Neurosurg 87 : 454-457, 1997 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1997.87.3.0454
  23. Rzaev DA, Kulikova EV, Moysak GI, Voronina EI, Ageeva TA : Teflon granuloma after microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve root in a patient with recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko 80 : 78-83, 2016
  24. Skirving DJ, Dan NG : A 20-year review of percutaneous balloon compression of the trigeminal ganglion. J Neurosurg 94 : 913-917, 2001 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.94.6.0913
  25. Stomal-Slowinska M, Slowinski J, Lee TK, Uitti RJ, Deen HG, Reimer R, et al. : Correlation of clinical findings and results of percutaneous balloon compression for patients with trigeminal neuralgia. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 113 : 14-21, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.08.005
  26. Tyler-Kabara EC, Kassam AB, Horowitz MH, Urgo L, Hadjipanayis C, Levy EI, et al. : Predictors of outcome in surgically managed patients with typical and atypical trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of results following microvascular decompression. J Neurosurg 96 : 527-531, 2002 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2002.96.3.0527
  27. Ugwuanyi UC, Kitchen ND : The operative findings in re-do microvascular decompression for recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Neurosurg 24 : 26-30, 2010 https://doi.org/10.3109/02688690903507489
  28. Wei Y, Pu C, Li N, Cai Y, Shang H, Zhao W : Long-term therapeutic effect of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: Kaplan-Meier analysis in a consecutive series of 425 patients. Turk Neurosurg 28 : 88-93, 2018
  29. Yang DB, Jiang DY, Chen HC, Wang ZM : Second microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in recurrent cases after microvascular decompression. J Craniofac Surg 26 : 491-494, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000001523
  30. Zhang H, Lei D, You C, Mao BY, Wu B, Fang Y : The long-term outcome predictors of pure microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia. World Neurosurg 79 : 756-762, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.01.040

Cited by

  1. Clinical efficacy of MVD combined with PSR in the treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia vol.20, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2020.8871
  2. Trigeminal neuralgia recurrence: a comparison of microvascular decompression and percutaneous balloon compression: a five years follow-up study vol.79, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2020-0115
  3. A Systematic Review of Repeat Microvascular Decompression for Recurrent or Persistent Trigeminal Neuralgia vol.158, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.129