DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Reform of Health System Governance in South Korea

보건의료체계의 거버넌스 개혁

  • Tchoe, Byongho (Graduate School of Urban Public Health, University of Seoul)
  • 최병호 (서울시립대학교 도시보건대학원, 한국보건행정학회)
  • Received : 2018.07.27
  • Accepted : 2018.08.23
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the current state of governance structure and management of the health system to achieve the goals of the health system in South Korea, and to propose reform plan. This study drew implications from the governance of United Kingdom, Germany, and Netherlands, based on the principle of health system proposed by World Health Organization. The presidency and the health ministry should make macroscopic decision-making. The government has to decentralize the enforcement by municipality to operate public health and national health insurance (NHI), and to distribute the centralized NHI fund by municipality. The front line health centers and community centers should provide integrated health and social services. The government has to establish diversified regulatory bodies to enhance both the patient-centered care and the efficiency and equity of health care, and to provide mechanisms for ensuring autonomy of providers. The governance of the health system should be composed of the centralization of macro decision-making, the decentralization of implementation by municipality, the integration of health and social services on the front line, and the well-balanced regulation and autonomy on both consumers and suppliers.

Keywords

References

  1. World Health Organization. World health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
  2. World Health Organization. Everybody's business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO's framework for action. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
  3. World Health Organization. Stewardship/governance of health systems in the WHO European Region. Proceedings of the Regional Committee for Europe fifty-eighty session; 2008 Sep 15-18; Tbilisi, Georgia. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Ofifce for Europe; 2008.
  4. Lee KS. Stewardship in health care system [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Insti- tute for Health and Welfare Policy; 2017 [cited 2018 Jun 20]. Available from: http://www.kihaw.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=sub3_5&wr_ id=28.
  5. Rechel B, Thomson S, von Ginneken E. Health systems in transition: template for authors [Internet]. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Ofce for Europe, European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2010 [cited 2018 Mar 13]. Available from: http://www.mateina.com.uy/clientes/omss/sites/default/files/hit%20template%20Observatorio%20europeo.pdf.
  6. Park JW. Current status of regional health inequality. Health Welf Forum 2018;(260):7-19.
  7. Byeon JY, Lee HY, Kim KA, Ahn SJ. The status of National Health Service of United Kingdom and reform trend [Internet]. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service, Health Insurance Policy Research Institute; 2014 [cited 2018 May 16]. Available from: https://academic.naver.com/article.naver?doc_id=128444231.
  8. Busse R, Blumel M, Knieps F, Barnighausen T. Statutory health insurance in Germany: a health system shaped by 135 years of solidarity, self-governance, and competition. Lancet 2017;390(10097):882-897. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31280-1.
  9. Kroneman M, Boerma W, van den Berg M, Groenewegen P, de Jong J, van Ginneken E. Netherlands: health system review. Health Syst Transit 2016;18(2):1-240. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/_data/assets/pdf_fle/0016/314404/HIT_Netherlands.pdf.