벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)

  • 제13권4호
  • /
  • Pages.245-254
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1975-7557(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9509(eISSN)
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)
권호 표지

심리적 자본이 혁신행동과 조직몰입에 미치는 효과 및 조직지원의 조절효과

The Effects of Psychological Capital on Innovation Behavior and Organizational Commitment, and the Moderating Effect of Organizational Support

  • 투고 : 2018.05.10
  • 심사 : 2018.08.06
  • 발행 : 2018.08.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 조직환경의 변화가 극심하며, 조직과 환경 간의 상호작용도 매우 커지고 있다. 따라서 급변하는 환경변화에 대하여 조직은 능동적이고도 자발적으로 참여하려는 구성원들의 노력이 요구되고 있다. 상사나 조직에 의해 주어지는 업무에 국한하여 수동적으로 업무처리를 하기 보다는 구성원이 스스로 소속감을 갖고 자발적이며, 긍정적인 자세로 업무에 몰입하는 자세가 요구된다. 한국폴리텍대학의 경우, 공공교육기관으로서 사회적으로 부각되고 있는 다양한 사회적 계층, 특히 청년들의 실업해소를 위해 구성원들의 자발적이고도 적극적인 업무태도를 필요로 하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 심리적 자본과 구성원들의 조직몰입 및 혁신행동의 관계를 조사하고, 이들의 관계에서 조직지원의 조절효과를 검증하고자 하였다. 첫째 조직몰입에 대해서는 자기효능감과 낙관주의가 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 자기효능감과 낙관주의가 조직몰입에 미치는 효과는 조직지원의 수준이 높을수록 조직몰입에 미치는 긍정적 효과는 배가되는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째 혁신행동은 조직의 변화와 환경변화에 대한 적응력을 제고하는데 도움이 된다. 이러한 혁신행동은 자기효능감, 회복력, 낙관주의 모두 긍정적 영향을 미친다는 점에서 이들 요소에 대한 관리가 요망된다. 심리적 자본과 혁신행동의 관계에서 조직지원의 조절효과는 나타나지 않았다. 셋째 조직지원은 그 자체로도 조직몰입과 혁신행동에 긍정적 영향을 미치며, 심리적자본인 자기효능감, 낙관주의와 상호작용하여 조직몰입에도 긍정적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.

The purpose of this study is to review the relationship between psychological capital and organizational commitment/ innovative behavior, and the moderating effect of organizational support. In order to verify and achieve the purposes mentioned above, questionnaire data were gathered and analysed from 315 professors and teachers of Korea Politechnics Colleges. Multiple regression and multiple hierarchical regression analysis were applied to test the proposed hypotheses: 1) the relationship between psychological capital and organizational commitment, 2) the relationship between psychological capital and innovative behavior, 3) the moderating effect of organizational support on the relationship between psychological capital and organizational commitment, 4) the moderating effect of organizational support on the relationship between psychological capital and innovative behavior. Empirical survey's findings are as follows; First, self-efficacy and optimism appeared to be positively related with organizational commitment, and all psychological capital factors(self-efficacy, resilience and optimism) appeared to be positively related with innovative behavior. Second, organizational support appeared to have moderating effect partly on the relationship between psychological capital and organizational commitment, but it did not have a moderating effect on the relationship between psychological capital and innovative behavior. Self-efficacy and optimism appeared to be more positively related with organizational commitment in higher organizational support situation than in lower organizational support situation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  2. Abbas, M., & Raja, U. (2015). Impact of psychological capital on innovative performance and job stress. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 32(2), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1314
  3. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control, New York: Freeman.
  5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  6. Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 533-546.
  7. Chen, Z., Eisenberger, R., Johnson, K. M., Sucharski, I. L. ,& Aselage, J. (2009). Perceived organizational support and extra-role performance: which leads to which?. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(1), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.149.1.119-124
  8. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. & West, J., (Eds.). (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press on Demand.
  10. Choi, S. H., & Kang, H. K. (2015). The effects of positive psychological capital on organizational commitment and job satisfaction: the mediating role of positive emotion. Management Information Systems Review, 34(5), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.29214/damis.2015.34.5.012
  11. Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine.
  12. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum, Mahwah NJ.
  13. Etzioni, A. (1975). Comparative analysis of complex organizations, rev. Simon and Schuster.
  14. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied psychology, 71(3), 500-507. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500
  15. Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.1.51
  16. Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.42
  17. Fuller, J. B., Barnett, T., Hester, K., & Relyea, C. (2003). A social identity perspective on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organizational commitment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(6), 789-791. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309600432
  18. Ga, S. M., Yoon, D. Y., & Han, S. H. (2017). The Effects of SME Employee's Psychological Capital on the Organization Commitment: The Moderating Effect of LMX. Korean Corporation Management Review, 76(0), 83-100.
  19. Ha, Y. K. (2008). Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Organizational Commitment in Hotel Industry: Focused on the Luxury Hotel Restaurants in Seoul. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 8(12), 404-413. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2008.8.12.404
  20. Han, H. S, Kim, M. S., & Kim, S. H. (2014). The effect of personality traits of a coffee shop customer on service value, customer satisfaction, and repurchase behavior: focused on franchise coffee shop versus independent coffee shop. Korean Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 23(6), 155-172.
  21. Han, J. H., & Yang, H. S. (2016). Structural Relationships between the Variables of Person-Environment Fit, Positive Psychological Capital and Innovative Work Behavior. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(10), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.10.225
  22. Han, N. Y., & Kim, Y. J. (2011). The Impacts of Psychological Empowerment on the Organizational Citizenship Behaviors of Hotel Service Employees : The Moderating Effect of Need for Achievement. Korean Journal of Management, 19(1), 185-226.
  23. Hong, W. K., & Ahn, K. Y. (2016), The Relationship Between Empowerment and Innovative Behavior, and the Moderating Effect of Psychological Ownership in Small Musiness. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 145-155.
  24. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
  25. Jeon, H. I., & Yoon, G. S. (2014), The Effect of Building Learning Organizations in Small-Medium Enterprises on Human Capital, Innovative Behavior and Organization Performance. Korea University of Technology Education Ph. D Dissertation.
  26. Jeong, C. H., & Kim, Y. W. (2013). A Study on the Effect of Emotional Labor on the Job Stress and Job Burnout of Social Work Civil Servants of SMG: focused on the Regulation Effect of Social Support. University of Seoul Ph. D Dissertation.
  27. Jeong, H. C., & Oh, S. Y. (2007). The impacts of emotions and organizational commitment on organizational citizenship behavior : centered on hospital organization, Honam University Ph. D Dissertation.
  28. Jin, Y. H., & Kim, S. J. (2016). Effect of authentic leadership and perceived organizational support on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 16(4), 23-35.
  29. Jung, S. W., Lee, Y. M., & Lim, D. Y. (2013). The Structural Modeling on the Perception of Local Government Officers’ Positive Psychological Capital and the Perception of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Organizational Commitment. GRI Review(Gyeonggi Research Institute), 15(1), 35-55.
  30. Kanter, R. M. (1988). Three tiers for innovation research. Communication Research, 15(5), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015005001
  31. Kelman, H. C. (1961). Three processes of social influence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78. https://doi.org/10.1086/266996
  32. Kim, C. I., & Han, K. S. (2015). Study on the effects about relationship between hotel employees' positive psychological capital, job engagement, counterproductive work behavior and innovative behavior. Kyonggi University Ph. D Dissertation.
  33. Kim, J. Y., & Jeon, B. H. (2017), The effects of university entrepreneurship education on innovation behavior: focusing on moderating effect of team-based learning. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(6), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.12.6.201712.99
  34. Kim, J. H. (2011). The Effects of Perceived Organizational Support, Teamwork, Organizational Commitment on Organizational Cynicism. KOREAN CORPORATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 39(0), 1-16.
  35. Kim, K. S., & Moon, S. J. (2016). The Structural Relationships between Psychological Capital, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment of Hotel Employees: Focusing on the moderating effect of perceived organizational support. Journal of Tourism Management Research, 20(6), 1-27.
  36. Kim, S. G., & Ahn, K. Y. (2017). The Relationships among Psychological Capital, Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Performance : The Moderating Effect of Co-worker Support. Sangji University Ph. D Dissertation.
  37. Kim, Y. C., & Song, H. D. (2015). The effect of job characteristics and perceived organizational support on the innovative behavior for R & D employees at manufacturing industries, and the mediating effect of job engagement. Andragogy Today : International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 18(3), 143-166.
  38. Lee, H. M., & Song, H. D. (2017). Structural Relationship among Positive Psychological Capital, Perceived Organizational Support, Work Engagement, and Innovative Behaviors for IT Sales Persons. Journal of Corporate Education, 19(4), 23-47.
  39. Lee, S. G., & Lee, M. C. (2016). The Effects of Public Social Worker's Psychological Resource on the Organizational Citizenship Behavior : Focusing on Mediating Effects of Job Attitude. Chosun University Ph. D Dissertation.
  40. Kim, Y. C., & Song, H. D. (2015). The effect of job characteristics and perceived organizational support on the innovative behavior for R & D employees at manufacturing industries, and the mediating effect of job engagement. Andragogy Today : International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 18(3), 143-166.
  41. Levinson, H. (1965). Reciprocation: The relationship between man and organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 370-390.
  42. Lorenz, T., Beer, C., Putz, J., & Heinitz, K. (2016). Measuring psychological capital: construction and validation of the compound PsyCap scale (CPC-12). PloS one, 11(4), e0152892. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152892
  43. Luthans, F. (2012). Psychological capital: Implications for HRD, retrospective analysis, and future directions. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 23(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21119
  44. Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., & Luthans, B. C. (2004). Positive psychological capital: Beyond human and social capital.
  45. Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 321-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300814
  46. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Li, W. (2005). The psychological capital of Chinese workers: Exploring the relationship with performance. Management and Organization Review, 1(2), 249-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2005.00011.x
  47. Michael, L. H., Hou, S. T., & Fan, H. L. (2011). Creative self-efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01430.x
  48. Moon, O. S., & Lee, A. J. (2014). The Effects of Psychological Capital on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Customer Orientation among Coffee Baristas: Focusingon Moderating Effect of Mindfulness. Sejong Unversity Ph. D Dissertation.
  49. Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607-634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657
  50. Park, J. P., & Jeon, I. O. (2011). Effects of MICE industrial employee's job stressors on intent to leave: exploring the mediating role of job satisfaction. job commitment and the moderating role of social support. Hoseo University Ph. D Dissertation.
  51. Park, Y. H. (2000), Organizational Behavior, Seoul PAKYOUNGSA.
  52. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
  53. Price, J. L., & Mueller, C. W. (1986). Absenteeism and turnover of hospital employees.
  54. Roh, S. D., & Kim, K. H. (2016). Social support, job stress, willingness to quit, and professional identity of sports educators for the disabled. Yong In University Ph. D Dissertation.
  55. Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (2003), Flourishing under fire: Resilience as a prototype of challenged thriving. Flourishing: Positive Psychology and the Life Well-lived, 15-36.
  56. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580-607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  57. Seligman, M. E. P. (1998). Learned Optimism, New York: Pocket Books.
  58. Shaheen, S., Bukhari, I., & Adil, A. (2016). Moderating role of psychological capital between perceived organizational support and organizational citizenship behavior and its dimensions. International Journal of Research Studies in Psychology, 5, 41-50.
  59. Snyder, C. R., Irving, L. M., & Anderson, J. R. (1991). Hope and health. Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The Health Perspective, 162, 285-305.
  60. Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522-536. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
  61. Stamper, C. L., & Johlke, M. C. (2003). The impact of perceived organizational support on the relationship between boundary spanner role stress and work outcomes. Journal of Management, 29(4), 569-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00025-4
  62. Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). Resilient individuals use positive emotions to bounce back from negative emotional experiences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320
  63. Verleysen, B., Lambrechts, F., & Van Acker, F. (2015). Building psychological capital with appreciative inquiry: Investigating the mediating role of basic psychological need satisfaction. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 51(1), 10-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886314540209
  64. Yang, Y. H., & Lee, S. C. (2018). A Study on the Effect of Resilience of members in Public Institutions on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment : Focusing on Public Enterprises and Quasi-Governmental Agencies, The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 21(4), 57-80. https://doi.org/10.20484/klog.21.4.3
  65. Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49388995