Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Considerations in the reliability of occlusal indicators and occlusal contact marks

교합점 기록재와 교합점 표식의 신뢰도에 관한 고려사항

  • Kim, hang-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Gon (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Ko, Kyung-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-La (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 김창환 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 김대곤 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 고경호 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 허윤혁 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 조리라 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박찬진 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Received : 2018.05.13
  • Accepted : 2018.06.14
  • Published : 2018.09.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

On the reliability of occlusal contact marks with occlusal indicators, it must be important to consider the affecting results of using methods. With affecting the accuracy and validity of results, there are many variables such as thickness and material of indicator, occlusal force, number of usage and etc. Nevertheless, researches on the occlusal contact marks have limited to focusing thickness of indicators and occlusal force. For the control of variables, it is clinically recommended to do use new indicators in every trial and to secure dry condition and to use thinner ones. In addition, alternatives might be helpful to understand more appropriate results.

교합점 기록재를 통해 교합점을 분석하는 방법이 신뢰할 만한가에 대해서는 사용하는 방법이 결과에 미칠 수 있는 영향을 고려해야 한다. 교합점 기록은 교합점 기록재료와 두께, 교합력, 사용 횟수, 재료의 물리적 특성, 매개 물질 등 많은 변수에 의해서 정확도, 신뢰도에 영향을 받을 수 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 교합점 기록재에 대한 연구는 환자의 교합력과 기록재의 두께 등 일부 요소에 대한 평가가 주를 이루어 다양성이 부족하다. 변수를 통제하기 위해 교합지는 가능하면 매 회 새것을 사용하고 구강 내 건조상태를 확보하며 가급적 얇은 교합지를 사용하여야 한다. 또한, 한가지 방법만으로 분석하는 것은 지양하여야 하며, 보조 수단을 함께 활용할 것이 추천된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Dawson PE. Functional occlusion: from TMJ to smile design. 1st ed. Philadelphia; Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. p.394-417.
  2. McNeill C. Science and practice of occlusion. 1st ed. Illinois; Quintessence Publishing; 1997. p.404-18.
  3. Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 7th ed. Philadelphia; Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. p.443-56.
  4. Zuccari AG, Oshida Y, Okamura M, Paez CY, Moore BK. Bulge ductility of several occlusal contact measuring paper-based sheets. Biomed Mater Eng 1997;7:265-70.
  5. Saracoglu A, Ozpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:522-6. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129064
  6. Sharma A, Rahul GR, Poduval ST, Shetty K, Gupta B, Rajora V. History of materials used for recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks: a literature review. J Clin Exp Dent 2013;5:e48-53.
  7. Forrester SE, Presswood RG, Toy AC, Pain MT. Occlusal measurement method can affect SEMG activity during occlusion. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:655-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02205.x
  8. Halperin GC, Halperin AR, Norling BK. Thickness, strength, and plastic deformation of occlusal registration strips. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:575-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90367-5
  9. Carossa S, Lojacono A. Schierano G, Pera P. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in the dental laboratory: influence of strip thickness and operator experience. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:201-4.
  10. Brizuela-Velasco A, Alvarez-Arenal A, Ellakuria-Echevarria J, del Rio-Highsmith J, Santamaria-Arrieta G, Martin-Bianco N. Influence of articulating paper thickness on occlusal contacts registration: a preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:360-2. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4112
  11. Millstein P, Maya A. An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators: a descriptive quantitative method. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:1280-6. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0373
  12. Schelb E, Kaiser DA, Brukl CE. Thickness and marking characteristics of occlusal registration strips. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:122-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(85)80086-X
  13. Carey JP, Craig M, Kerstein RB, Radke J. Determining a relationship between applied occlusal load and articulating paper mark area. Open Dent J 2007;1:1-7. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210600701010001
  14. Saad MN, Weiner G, Ehrenberg D, Weiner S. Effects of load and indicator type upon occlusal contact markings. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;85:18-22.
  15. Reiber T, Fuhr K, Hartmann H, Leicher D. Recording occlusal indicators. Introduction to occlusal surface materials and roughness. ZWR 1989;98:756-61.
  16. Qadeer S, Kerstein R, Kim RJ, Huh JB, Shin SW. Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:7-12. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.1.7
  17. Kerstein RB, Radke J. Clinician accuracy when subjectively interpreting articulating paper markings. Cranio 2014;32:13-23. https://doi.org/10.1179/0886963413Z.0000000001
  18. Sutter BA. A digital poll of dentists testing the accuracy of paper mark subjective interpretation. Cranio 2017;9:1-8.
  19. Reiber T, Fuhr K, Hartmann H, Leicher D. Recording pattern of occlusal indicators. I. Influence of indicator thickness, pressure, and surface morphology. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1989;44:90-3.
  20. Anderson GC, Schulte JK, Aeppli DM. Reliability of the evaluation of occlusal contacts in the intercuspal position. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:320-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90215-A
  21. Harper KA, Setchell DJ. The use of shimstock to assess occlusal contacts: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:347-52.
  22. Maness WL. Laboratory comparison of three occlusal registration methods for identification of induced interceptive contacts. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:483-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90284-4
  23. Gazit E, Fitzig S, Lieberman MA. Reproducibility of occlusal marking techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:505-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90188-5
  24. Kerstein RB, Lowe M, Harty M, Radke J. A force reproduction analysis of two recording sensors of a computerized occlusal analysis system. Cranio 2006;24:15-24. https://doi.org/10.1179/crn.2006.004
  25. Throckmorton GS, Rasmussen J, Caloss R. Calibration of T-Scan sensors for recording bite forces in denture patients. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:636-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01978.x
  26. Cerna M, Ferreira R, Zaror C, Navarro P, Sandoval P. Validity and reliability of the $T-Scan^{(R)}$ III for measuring force under laboratory conditions. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:544-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12284
  27. Augusti D, Augusti G, Re D, Dellavia C, Gianni AB. Effect of different dental articulating papers on SEMG activity during maximum clenching. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2015;25:612-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.04.006
  28. Helms RB, Katona TR, Eckert GJ. Do occlusal contact detection products alter the occlusion? J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:357-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02277.x
  29. Toledo MF, Joias RP, Marques-Iasi YS, Neves AC, Rode Sde M. Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips. J Appl Oral Sci 2014;22:516-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720140117
  30. Mitchem JA, Katona TR, Moser EAS. Does the presence of an occlusal indicator product affect the contact forces between full dentitions? J Oral Rehabil 2017;44:791-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12543
  31. Korioth TW. Number and location of occlusal contacts in intercuspal position. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:206-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90180-K
  32. Malta Barbosa J, Urtula AB, Hirata R, Carames J. Thickness evaluation of articulating papers and foils. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:70-2. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12343

Cited by

  1. 광조사교합분석법을 이용한 머리 위치와 교합접촉면적의 관계 vol.35, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2019.35.2.90