Communications of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집)

Korean Society of Mathematical Education (한국수학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Application of STEAM Education Model centered on Mathematics Subject using Real-life Context

실생활 맥락을 활용한 수학교과 중심의 STEAM 교육 모형 개발 및 적용

  • Received : 2018.04.05
  • Accepted : 2018.05.30
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a STEAM education model on the basis of mathematics curriculum using real life context, and to analyze the effect of the class based on developed model to make applicable pedagogical discussion. For this purpose, STEAM class materials that can be used in terms of recognition, connection, extension, and application of mathematical concepts, principles and laws are considered, taking into consideration the ways in which real life contexts and mathematical learning could be harmonized. As a results of using these materials, it was empirically confirmed that students' cognitive thinking and affective aspects abilities were improved. The STEAM instruction centered on the mathematics curriculum and the mathematics class based on the data developed in this study have a unique identity compared to the conventional general mathematics teaching methods using the textbooks. And it is pursuing the future class model which could present desirable creativity and personality education. The result of this study would provide preliminary data and meaningful implications to the researchers for next curriculum and concomitant instructional materials as well as the mathematics teachers.

본 연구는 실생활 맥락을 활용한 수학교과 중심의 STEAM 교육 모형을 개발하고, 이 모형에 근거한 자료를 활용하여 진행된 수업이 학생들에게 어떤 영향을 주었는지 분석하여 적용 가능한 교수학적 논의를 하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 실생활 맥락의 주제 전개 방식과 수학 학습이 조화를 이룰 수 있는 방안을 고려하여, 수학적 개념 원리 법칙의 인식 연결 확장 적용이 가능한 모형 및 수학교과에서 활용 가능한 STEAM 수업 자료를 개발했다. 또한 이 자료들을 활용하여 수학 수업을 진행하였으며, 그 결과 학생들의 인지적 사고 능력 및 정의적 차원의 역량이 향상되었다는 것을 경험적으로 확인할 수 있었다. 본 연구를 통하여 개발된 수학교과 중심의 STEAM 수업 자료와 이를 활용한 수학 수업은 전통적으로 교과서를 활용하여 진행되는 기존의 일반적인 수학 수업 방식과 비교되는 독자성 및 정체성이 있다고 볼 수 있으며, 바람직한 창의 인성교육이 가능한 미래의 수업 모델을 추구한다고 할 수 있다. 본 연구의 결과는 현장의 수학 교사에게는 물론이고 차기 교육과정 및 교과용 도서 개발을 위한 기초적인 자료 및 시사점을 제공할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011). Mathematics Curriculum. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology announcement 2011-361.
  2. Ministry of Education (2015). Mathematics Curriculum. Ministry of Education announcement 2015-74.
  3. Kim, H. J. (2015). A study on the mathematics teachers' perceptions of STEAM education. MA. Thesis. Graduate School of Education, Dankook University.
  4. Park, H. S. (1991). The history of korean mathematics education. Seoul: Daehan Textbook Co.
  5. Park, H. J., Kim, Y. M., Noh, S. G., Lee, J. Y., Jeong, J. S., Choi, Y. H., Han, H. S., & Baek, Y. S. (2012). Components of 4C-STEAM education and a checklist for the instructional design. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 12(4), 533-557.
  6. Baek, Y. S., Park, H. J., Kim, Y. M., Noh, S. G., Lee, J. H., Jeong, J. S., Choi, Y. H., Han, H. S., & Choi, J. H. (2012). A study on the action plans for STEAM education. Research report of Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity 2012-12.
  7. Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education (2012). A Study on teaching-learning materials development and Application for STEAM(2011' Research report of teachers for STEAM). Seoul education research report 2012-18.
  8. Lee, J. H. (2014). The analysis on domestic research trends for STEAM education of mathematics. MA. Thesis. Graduate School of Education, Ajou University.
  9. Lee, H. S., Lim, H. M., & Moon, J. E. (2010). A Study on the design and implementation of mathematics and science integrated Instruction. J .Korea Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. A: The Mathematical Education, 49(2), 175-198.
  10. Chang, H. W. (2012). Study on the standards for mathematical practice of common core state standards for mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics. 22(4), 557-580.
  11. Cho, H. S., Kim, H., & Huh, J. Y. (2012). Understanding of STEAM through school application case. Research report of Korean Educational Development Institute 2012-02-02.
  12. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity (2011). A study of Mathematics education curriculum. Policy Study 2011-11.
  13. Han, H. S. (2013). The analysis of research trends on STEAM instructional program and the development of mathematics-centered STEAM instructional program. J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 27(3), 523-545.
  14. Hwang, H. J., & Huh, N. (2016). The study on the integrated thinking ability in problem based learning program using historical materials in mathematics. J. Korea Soc. Math. Ed. Ser. E: Communications of Mathematical Education, 30(2), 161-178.
  15. Brown, J. (2012). The current status of STEM education research, Journal of STEM Education, 13(5). 7-11.
  16. CCSSI (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. U.S.A.
  17. De Lange (1996). Using and applying mathematics in education. in: A.J. Bishop, et al. (eds). International handbook of mathematics education, Part one. 49-97. Kluwer academic publisher.
  18. Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  19. Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics 39, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816
  20. Jurdak, M. (2006). Contrasting perspectives and performance of high school students on problem solving in real world, situated, and school contexts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-9008-y
  21. Moore. T. J., & Smith. K. A. (2014). Advancing the state of the art of STEM integration. Journal of STEM Education, 15(1), 5-10.
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. 구광조, 오병승, 류희찬 공역(1992). 수학교육과정과 평가의 새로운 방향. 서울: 경문사.
  23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. 류희찬, 조완영, 이경화, 나귀수, 김남균, 방정숙 공역(2007). 학교수학을 위한 원리와 규준. 서울: 경문사.
  24. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, and B. Findell (Eds.). Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education,. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.. Washington, DC: National Academy.
  25. OECD (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. Project report.
  26. Schroeder, T. L., & Lester, F. K. (1989). Developing understanding in mathematics via problem solving, In P. R. Trafton, & A. P. Shulte (Eds.), New Directions for elementary mathematics(Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics), Reston, VA: NCTM.
  27. Stinner, A. (1995) Contextual settings, science stories, and large context problems: Toward a more humanistic science education, Science Education, 79(5), 555-581. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790506
  28. Treffers, A. (1987). Three dimensions: A model of goal and theory description in mathematics education. The Wiskobas Project, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.